Topic: Wisconsin Judge Having Trouble Getting Re-elected | |
---|---|
It's not all bad news. It highlights the reputation that the GOP has developed for itself of deceit and election dishonesty. Things are still going very, very well. I hope you are willing to share the halucinigenics you are on |
|
|
|
Those hallucinigenics you're talking about are freely available to everybody. They're called oxygen and information.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
TJN
on
Fri 04/08/11 09:19 AM
|
|
Yes oxygen Is good. And information is only as good as the source.
The vice chair of Waukesha is a high ranking democrat and she has gone over the votes in question and has found no fraud in the election. Everything "jives" with her. |
|
|
|
That's what I'm saying. It matters not whether Prosser is legitimately elected. Public sentiment is still moving in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
Yes it is. That's why WI voted in mostly republicans in November 2010. And the election on Tuesday verified that.
|
|
|
|
The name of Kathy Nickolaus is likely to become a household name in coming times. She is the Waukeshaw County clerk who reported the error that resulted in adding over 7000 votes for David Prosser. It tuns out that she had worked for Davis Prosser for 13 years.
Questions were immediately raised about the new announcement. As Schneider wrote, prior to the election, Nickolaus "was heavily criticized for her decision to keep the county results on an antiquated personal computer, rather than upgrade to a new data system being utilized statewide."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/07/david-prosser-wisconsin-supreme-court_n_846431.html
Added Schneider: "Nickolaus cited security concerns for keeping the data herself -- yet when she reported the data, it did not include the City of Brookfield, whose residents cast nearly 14,000 votes." The Waukesha County Board also heavily criticized the clerk after she brushed aside their recommendations for improving election security. At one point during a hearing in January, board chairman Jim Dwyer grew exasperated with Nickolaus and said, "There really is nothing funny about this, Kathy. Don't sit there and grin when I'm explaining what this is about." "Wisconsin deserves elections that are fair, clean and transparent," said Scot Ross, the executive director of the progressive advocacy group One Wisconsin Now. "There is a history of secrecy and partisanship surrounding the Waukesha County Clerk and there remain unanswered questions." Neither the campaigns nor the Democratic and Republican parties in the state were immediately available for comment. An official recount may be sought as early as next week. Prosser announced Thursday that he was assembling an all-star legal team for the recount, including Washington, D.C.-based attorney Ben Ginsberg, who was part of then-Gov. George W. Bush's 2000 recount team and former Sen. Norm Coleman's counsel in Minnesota in 2008. |
|
|
|
Remember the word fact. First of all it wasn't her personal computer. And there is no law stating they have to report the PRELIMINARY results to the AP. The canvas started Thursday. That is when the official count is done. People need to stop jumping to conclusions before they know the FACTS.
|
|
|
|
Here's the latest on the SC election fraud suspicion in Wisconsin.
A statewide certification, which adds up the county results, will be delayed until a Government Accountability Board investigation into the election is completed . . . His opponent, Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg, will have until 5 p.m. Wednesday to call for a recount if she chooses to do so. . . . Adding to the confusion, the Democratic Party of Wisconsin cried foul last Thursday when apparent inconsistencies in Waukesha for the 2006 Attorney General election between Attorney General J. B. Van Hollen and Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk turned up.
The 2006 figures for Waukesha County show 174,047 votes were cast for the candidates in that race. However, according to the same figures, only 156,804 votes were cast in the whole election. The non-partisan GAB’s investigation into the Waukesha ballots will now include the 2006 election, according to GAB Staff Attorney Mike Hoss. . . . “It may turn out that in fact, Nickolaus just, as she said, made a colossal error,” said Executive Director Jay Heck. http://badgerherald.com/news/2011/04/17/dems_find_discrepanc.php |
|
|
|
Yes it is. That's why WI voted in mostly republicans in November 2010. And the election on Tuesday verified that. ![]() |
|
|
|
non-sequitur
|
|
|
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/06/wisconsin-election-recount_n_845565.html The Wisconsin Supreme Court race between Justice David Prosser and JoAnne Kloppenburg was still too close to call on Wednesday morning. One day after voters took to the polls in the Badger State to decide the match-up, it seemed that a recount vote would be likely to occur.
The Milwaukee-Journal Sentinel reports: As of 10:40 a.m., the Associated Press had results for all but 3 of the state's 3,630 precincts and Kloppenburg had taken a 224 vote lead after Prosser had been ahead most of the night by less than 1,000 votes. That close margin had political insiders from both sides talking about the possibility of a recount, which Wisconsin has avoided in statewide races in recent decades. Any recount could be followed by lawsuits -- litigation that potentially would be decided by the high court. According to the Associated Press, a recall election in the race would have to be requested by no later than April 20. Counties must start to canvas the vote on Thursday and they have until April 15 to turn in the results. Once the county's last report is filed, a recount can be requested within three business days. Prosser's campaign didn't immediately return a message early Wednesday. However, the Journal-Sentinel reported that he told supporters at his election-night party that there was "little doubt" there would be a recount. When the numbers showed her behind, Kloppenburg told supporters she hadn't given up. "We're still hopeful," Kloppenburg said. "So thank you all and let's all get a good night's sleep and see what tomorrow brings." Labor groups and conservative activists turned the match-up into an intense and expensive contest that offered the public their first formal opportunity to weigh in on the national fight over union rights. According to the AP, the race was the most expensive of its kind in state history. The news reports yesterday were that the Prosser people were already high-fiving yesterday, planning a huge victory party. It's probably kind of quiet over there at this time. got noisy again ya think? |
|
|