100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Length.. - part 18 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my enemy; pollock. why? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like that style. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bunch of bull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks more like a bunch of houses to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like that style. haha. people with mental issues relate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like that style. van gogh...starry night. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That could explain my taste in art. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bunch of bull. why? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have ocd.
everything should be perfected. but pollock is random. and I like free random art. but I relate that to children. and I believe only they know how to do it correctly. adults just try to imitate them. but fail. in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Crack Daily?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with that.
If I had to choose a favorite style, I would have to choose American folk, but that's just because it remminds me of my grandma, my childhood, and a time where I think I can remember actually being happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smoke crack all day errday.
my favorite painting is probably of a tree. I can't remember by who. but it has no vertical or horizontal lines. just made up of a bunch of curves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interesting......
but i used it as a means of pointing out the importance of perspective. of course it is subjective as well. take Escher, for instance, some of his sketchings can have the same sort of random qualities (though a lot more detailed for sure) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds interesting. I'm not sure if I've seen it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
escher is a genius.
I don't find him random. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
kc0003
on
Sat 03/26/11 12:00 AM
|
|
yes he is (was) a genius
but you don't find suspended stairways that leads to nowhere even a bit random? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usher?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not at all.
I very much appreciate his incorporation of math. it's all geometry which can be translated into architecture. which isn't all that random. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well relativity and perspective are the two things he owns (so to speak) but i do think they can thrive and still evoke a touch of randomness. at which he (in my opinion) is the master.
|
|
|
|
|
