Topic: State of our personal finances? | |
---|---|
Edited by
AndyBgood
on
Fri 01/28/11 03:00 PM
|
|
Calling BS on that. It is not gonna cost you almost 1k a month extra per person in the family. Oh and some of those expenses could be accounted for as in that year I bought full snowboard equipment, a season pass for snowboarding, took martial arts, and paid for a private japanese tutor. http://www.parentdish.com/2010/02/24/how-much-does-it-cost-to-raise-a-child/ Everyone knows that it’s expensive to raise a kid. Just how expensive is it to raise a child? The real price tag on raising a child from birth to 18 is pretty staggering- it may be far more than you ever expected it to be. Each child that you raise will cost more than buying three brand new, 2011 Jaguar XFs. When you think of the big, expensive times in a child’s life, your mind might linger on two major intervals in their lives: when they’re a baby or when they’re a teenager. However, there is no inexpensive time in a child’s life. Every phase in a child’s life comes with extensive expenses that can make budgeting difficult for most families. During the time from birth through age two, it costs about $11,700 to raise the younger child in a family that earns a middle class income and has two parents and two children.Click on the graphic to find out. While this sounds like a lot of money, this is actually the least expensive three-year period in a child’s life. What is the most expensive one? Even if you’ve had kids, you may be surprised how expensive each phase of a child’s life really is. Few parents really take the time to add up all of those expenses, both small and large, and the real cost of raising a kid might come as something of a sticker shock Visual Economics: How Much Does It Really Cost to Raise a Kid? - VisualEconomics.com http://www.visualeconomics.com/how-much-does-it-really-cost-to-raise-a-kid/#ixzz1CLF8wm00 http://www.visualeconomics.com/ You listen way too much to experts! First of all I know people with three kids making do with $50 in expenses. They outright own the car they drive which is old but works fine. You come off sounding like you are full of Bandini when you start spouting all these government experts. It was government experts who caused most of this economic pickle in the first place. You sound like you are spouting statistics based in New York city where the cost of living is ridiculously high! Having money helps but frankly not everyone has money or the acumen to make it or keep it. People always over extend themselves when they think they can get away with it. Worst is the Welfare programs actually encouraged teen birth and unwed pregnancy to allow many welfare warrior mothers to live off of the government checks and eventually fall back on " I need welfare becasue I gave up my life to raise my babies" later. I grew up knowing poverty. Preaching about poverty in front of me is asking for it. I bust my *** to get out of the hole others hold out their hands acting entitled to a free ride out of. And as for buying stuff for their kids? Well, two things, if you can't afford to have kids you shouldn't, and likewise If your lifestyle is costing $50,000 you had better learn to tighten your belt. Also people ride bicycles to save money and it helps them loose some of the FAT AZZ most Americans have these days! People are just too fat and happy here in good ole America! Time some of these Fat Azzes starve a little to motivate them to get work or find a way legitimate of making money! |
|
|
|
P.S. How can an average household be two adults and two and a half children?
Does Uncle Sam take half of the third one? |
|
|
|
P.S. How can an average household be two adults and two and a half children? Does Uncle Sam take half of the third one? ![]() |
|
|
|
Let's don't ignore the facts.
Chairman Ben Bernanke told the panel that the crisis put 12 of the 13 most important U.S. financial firms at risk of failure within a period of a week or two, and that it surpassed in severity even the Great Depression, a period in which he is a noted expert.
"As a scholar of the Great Depression, I honestly believe that September and October of 2008 was the worst financial crisis in global history, including the Great Depression," said Bernanke in a November 2009 interview with the commission. "If you look at the firms that came under pressure in that period ... only one ... was not at serious risk of failure." This is what we have had to deal with and whichever way you look at it it isn't pretty. Shake-n-bake fixes aren't the answer. Maybe in the short term but they would only lead to repetition of failure. Slow real growth with responsible regulation is the only way to long term economic security. |
|
|
|
P.S. How can an average household be two adults and two and a half children? Does Uncle Sam take half of the third one? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
P.S. How can an average household be two adults and two and a half children? Does Uncle Sam take half of the third one? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I tried to read this entire thread, but I made it halfway before I had to stop and say something.
First off, I agree with both Andy and AdventureBegins. As they both know from other topics, I don't always agree with them. I often do not agree with Fanta, but after reading his posts, I now understand him a helluva lot better than I ever did in the past. And that means I have new respect for him. Second: This country needs to throw Keynes' economics into the circular file. That's because all the top economists were bred upon the golden ideals of Keynes. Our entire economic system has been founded upon his principles since WWII. Our never ending cycle of debt began just after WWII. We have failed to have a debt-free year in 5 decades. This is because Keynes' economics advocates that deficit spending is good for the economy. But when the debt grows beyond a certain point, it begins to DEVALUE currency - and that increases the debt even more! So who does Keynes' economics truly benefit? Banks, investors, and insurance companies. They make money off of the constant debt. But when the debt keeps growing rather than shrinking, these same people LOSE money because they never get repaid. And that means less money to loan businesses and individuals. Plain and simple: debt is meant to be temporary, not permanent. Permanent debt causes you, your local businesses, and your bank to lose money. (The bank can't reinvest the loan money to make another gain. Since you don't repay the loan, you have reduced purchasing power because of bills and reduced credit score....that means you cannot afford to buy as many goods from retailers.) Therefore, paying off debt is always the best option, and it is what makes lending money a healthy practice rather than a destructive one. |
|
|