If We Only Knew



I wondered what we would do if we Knew?

Would I change anything? Could I change anything?

If I knew when disater was to happen how would I prepare?

Combat Boots and a array of weapons.

If we knew, even, hows one to tell what he knew if he never Knew of it?

Molecules moving like a Nucleon to infancy.

We all know a Father does not think when he see's his child focused on a Ball and can not see the car coming.

He does not know but we see the car. Yet we do not calculate to determine whats going to happen.

We just do it. We protect we run yell scream and finally do whatever is necessary to save our child.

The only death we have on our mind is our offsprings life.

No selfishness just pure protection of a loving heart to save, to do whats right. Nothing else will do.

Yet our same child does something stupid that we have told him never to do that will teach him a valuable lesson if he does.. he will never do that again, we know.

We still see some pain but not thier life or limb.. we just allow it. learn the hard way if you wish.

we gotta have trust when trust runs away we are all out of ammo.

Lifes trust.

A military squadrant getting ready for a parade in front of the General will Face off in perfect formation to show thier dedicationn and trust.

Trust that this man will lead them rightly into a field that will not harm them.

So the trust and obey.. Like the song Trust and Obey for thiers no other way.

When they Face Off they all look right extend thier right arm to the others edge of his left arm straight in a line.

Thier left arm rises and grabs the should of the one in front of them and thus the whole squadrand has become a Right formation.

This to ensure to thier commander that when they are in the field of battle as they have each others back but when they fall they are thier to help them without thought of restreat.

Just faith of child learning the right way before they become entangles with the future they do not see.

If we only knew would we change things? Would we work harder to accomplish a pure goal?

Then what is that goal because when does all the other things within ones life take place does he have time to conform to each and everyone of them

To far to see.But then if we do as the father as in his instant Love for his child thier is no preparing for that we do not know is going to happen. We just act.

Faith tells us this is what to do when faced with uncertainty.

A Trusting Faith builds an Army that no one can destroy because how do you destroy those who with no thought will protect it own?

with a glimer of light that says no.. i will do whats right.

Whats right is an alignment for The Faith of The Fathers.

Who say afar off planing hoping for a better ending. Leaving clues and wonder, to make you think. What am I doing?

where did this come from? am I clueless?

No for a better word of it the silent message that is written in our Hearts say thiers more than us. Thiers got to be.

How do you fight what you can not see? Principles.

We are no deciever who acts out of malious but with a childs understanding. Jonny want a bite of my pudding.

Good son. A son who listens to instructions left long ago for a people who look around and imagine the unimaginable.

we see a people lost in thier Dreams of life that leaves whoever behind because I got to have it.

Its a thing I can not explain my next move but I gotta be 1st.

1st for what? 1st for lifes meaningful pleasure that came in the back door and now all we see is a glowing lust.

Lost our desire for lust is the desire of left over apples we are full of.

Apples and organges curving a society, thats out of control with meaningless desire of lust.

yet we at anytime can go back to a real parent and say I wanna learn and you are accepted with open arms for the Parent knows and Believes in the Commandment of Trust.

The yearning to know more from those who wish us no harm but thier desire is to give us what we need to succeed.

Success is measured in many cups as the saying goes full or not.

A parents success is to see its offspring become what they wanted for themselves. U before me.

So when it comes to seeing life we muct wonder how can I?

I have no crystal ball to see what i may not beable to do nothing about.

Everything is new in any point in time because it has not happened yet.. Is this true?

To Trusts and Obey is the Foundations of a Good life with out the U in it but the must part of Believing..It'll be ok.

we all are born and we all die but in between a how is our life Structure?

Does it come out of no where but from what we are told and see with experience the ultimate conclusion of Faith.

Now we know not the things we can not see but the unseen because the unseen comes as we see or not.

Then the question must be posed how do we see the unseen?

Principles of the Commandment of Trust of an Army of great multitude that strives for the same yet they know not yet what that might be.

We are told to Trust to Believe and the Will of Your Father is the Faith of his Children that if I live by the Principles of Life.

The principles that we Trust because the Most Trustful you know says do this.Then the will becomes what your Father always wanted. A faithful child that knows doing right is the Way of life.. Blessings..Miles

If we woudld understand and see where the Faith of our Fathers we have shoved to the side for a new way.

That our allies are determined by Me 1st. Whats in it for me.

See a great lesson if you have Netflixs and may I suggest you watch and see the movie " Tibet: City of the Snow Lion"

People of Peace who forgive, yet a people who we lay aside if thiers nothing in it for us. Tells a a mystery that is in front of us unseen because we see what we want to see because I before me is a proper way of the unimaginable site of imagination.. Shalom..Miles

Is this about how Tibet was annexed by the chinese?

Yea its about Tibet and how powers work to limit a culture. How we the people are sanctioned into submission through starvation and brute force. hat we the people will not fight the fight to protect the peaceful if our interest is not at hand. How pleadings for our help went unanswered and subquintently became a part of cultural destruction for the power of commerence. Letting what we believe only pertains to us if commerence may be affected by our intervention to protect a culture that believed fighting for thier beliefs was not answer.. That killing is wrong and would die before taking a life yet protested signed treaties with the united nation as a foriegn power but when china put out her strong arm we backed away and covered our ears as thier muffled cries went unheard.
Its only gotten worse and is a sign of things to come when Govt. declares religion a Terrorists to its people.. Shalom...Miles

China The USA, Waco and Tibet. Religious Poison?

I have seen that Religion is Poison even spoke on these Boards.

China and The United States what are thier state policies. Found this from 1999.. the original has been taken down but seems to be a copy though.

No religion in Govt. but Govt. desides Religion is ok. No?


Tucson lawyer presses for truth about Waco

'Peons' ran Waco operation, lawyer says

Emmanuel Lozano/The Arizona Republic

Tucson lawyer David Hardy says his own
experience as a federal bureaucrat helped him conclude that the
real villains in the Branch Davidian siege at Waco, Texas, in
1993 were what he calls the "Omnipotent Peons."

By William Hermann
The Arizona Republic
Sept. 20, 1999


TUCSON - David Hardy says he's no far-right fanatic -
just because he helped force the FBI to admit it used incendiary
tear gas during the 1993 Branch Davidian siege in Waco, Texas.

Hardy also insists he's no gun nut - just because he
believes the Constitution gives citizens the right to bear arms.

Instead, Hardy says, he's a civil libertarian with a
healthy distrust of government - and part of an old Arizona
family so classic that it included a Cave Creek judge who was
actually a fugitive from justice.

As for Waco, Tucson attorney Hardy said his own
experience as a federal bureaucrat helped him conclude that the
real villains at Waco were what he calls the "Omnipotent Peons."

"In the end, it'll be the OPs who are to blame for
screwing up the first violent encounter and for the cover-up
after the fire," said Hardy, 48, sitting in the weapon-bedecked
office of his northeast Tucson home. "There was a whole cadre of
OPs at work at Waco.

"The government isn't run by Cabinet members or
department heads," he said with a laugh. "The government is run
by middle-level and lower-level peons who do what they damned
well please.
Emmanuel Lozano/The Arizona Republic

Hardy holds the end of a "Ferret" tear
gas round, which the FBI said it used on the Branch Davidian
compound. It is not a pyrotechnic device.

"I doubt that (U.S. Attorney General) Janet Reno or
(FBI Director) Louis Freeh had any idea of the cover-up we've
been discovering," he said. "But I believe subordinates of theirs
did. And the people who were on the scene certainly did."

Fiery finish
Branch Davidian cult leader David Koresh and about 80
of his followers were killed April 19, 1993, when fire consumed
their compound near Waco. Government officials insisted that
Koresh's followers started the fire - not the government agents
who had surrounded the area after a Feb. 28, 1993, shootout that
left four federal agents and five Branch Davidians dead.

The Waco conflagration is back again on the national
stage. Hardy was instrumental in prompting the recent reopening
of the case by the Justice Department and the independent
investigation headed by former Sen. John Danforth.

The controversial case returned to haunt federal
officials after disclosures that FBI agents used tear gas
canisters with the potential for starting a blaze shortly before
the fire.

Since a few months after the Branch Davidian compound
fire, Hardy has demanded government documents, sued the
government and harried government officials, all in an effort "to
get at the truth of what happened there."

Since 1995, Hardy has filed eight freedom of
information act requests with federal officials seeking material
relating to the Waco incident. His persistence has resulted in
the government turning over to him hundreds of documents and
stacks of audiotapes and videotapes.

Hardy has worked closely with Michael McNulty, a
one-time Colorado insurance agent turned documentary filmmaker.
The two have forced the government to admit that potentially
flammable tear gas canisters were indeed used at Waco and that
elite Delta Force soldiers were on the scene of the siege
advising government agents.

After Hardy unearthed the Delta Force information,
McNulty convinced an assistant U.S. attorney in Waco to let him
search the lockers holding evidence gathered at the siege. There,
McNulty found the potentially flammable tear gas canisters that
the government had denied using.

"They all along had maintained they'd used about 400
projectiles very much like this one, only a little bigger," said
Hardy, holding up a non-flammable type of tear gas device.
"McNulty found flammable ones, canisters that easily could have
got a fire started."

Since Hardy began receiving national notice for his
part in revealing irregularities in the government's version of
Waco - he has appeared on radio and television news programs and
was the subject of a New York Times article - many have asked if
he is a right-wing ideologue.

"I'm more a 1960s liberal on civil liberties," he
said. "I think we need to protect our civil liberties. I think we
need to watch very carefully what government officials and
employees are doing."

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for Arizona and state
Attorney General Warner Lee said it shouldn't matter what Hardy's
politics are "as long as he has solid evidence."

"If he comes up with evidence that public officials
have misled the American public, more power to him," Phoenix
attorney Lee said. "If a citizen is willing to spend the time and
effort to come up with something solid instead of just soapboxing
about his political views, then he is to be paid attention to."

Both sides of law

Hardy traces his Arizona lineage back to Charles W.
Hardy, who became the first justice of the peace for Cave Creek,
north of Phoenix, in 1890.

But he laughs when he talks about the JP.

"Actually, his real name was Nathaniel Hickman, and
he was a fugitive felon at the time, though I've never been able
to discover just what crime he committed," he said. "He came from
southern Illinois, and I have his Civil War pension application."

Hardy's family left Phoenix in 1958 and moved to
Tucson. Hardy got a bachelor's degree and law degree from the
University of Arizona.

And when it comes to OPs in the government, Hardy
says he knows whereof he speaks.

"I worked with dozens when I was in Washington, D.C.,
in the late '80s and early '90s, working for the Department of
Interior," he said. "We were under orders from our bosses not to
report anything to the head of our department. He was supposed to
be kept completely in the dark."

Hardy returned to private practice in Tucson in 1992.
He also wrote articles for the Harvard Journal of Law and Public
Policy and the Journal of Law and Politics. He has written
extensively about militias in U.S. history, particularly during
the time of the framing of the Constitution.

The Second Amendment is of special interest to gun
enthusiast Hardy.

"Some framers, such as George Mason, were concerned
about preserving the militia as a state-run institution," Hardy
said. "But Jefferson was concerned about the rights of individual
citizens to bear arms.

"We can't really understand what's going on with the
Second Amendment unless we understand that it has two different
objects," he said. "Mason wants to preserve militias, Jefferson
wants to protect the individual's right to bear arms and Madison
tried to appease both men when he wrote the amendment. It has two
purposes."

Hardy said he hopes that his research into the Waco
incident will do more than cause government officials some
embarrassment.

"I have for some time been trying to show that law
enforcement is becoming increasingly militaristic," Hardy said.

"The military attacks, shoots, kills, destroys," he
said. "Law officers are supposed to talk to people and perhaps
make arrests. We're seeing too many law officers in black suits,
calling themselves SWAT teams, with submachine guns, sniper
rifles and an attack mentality."

Hardy paused and looked around his office a moment.

"Which is exactly what we saw at Waco," he said.


***

William Hermann can be reached at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via e-mail or at 1-602-444-4875.


=================================================================
Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg24354.html