Topic: IndnPrncs Hotel/Bar - part 117
IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:27 PM
Oh yeah I forgot our 9.75% tax... laugh

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:28 PM
thanks David...

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:28 PM
oh bite me...

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:29 PM
let me see if i can cover the tax.

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:30 PM
oh man you're calling my azz big.. tears

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:31 PM
tax = azz....who new?

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:34 PM
you forgot-- bite me which = tax = azz...

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:36 PM
it's all Davey's fault. he introduced the tax in the first place.

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:39 PM
Yes let's blame Davey for you saying I have a big azz.. whoa

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:42 PM
that bastard!

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:43 PM
I'm sure the guilt of what he's done will drive him mad..

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:44 PM
yes, just wait till it catches up with him....

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:46 PM
oh but wait until I kick your butt... That UPS may NEVER ARRIVE!!!!

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:46 PM
i am innocent!

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:46 PM
:angel:

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:48 PM
...besides i think you used the "new" math to reach this rationality because I still don’t see it.

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:54 PM
It really doesn't matter what math I used.. YOU gave me algebraic variable that was necessary to come to the end value...

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:55 PM
however your answer is irrational, because you crossed fact with interpretation.

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 12/01/10 10:56 PM
I don't think so.. I think there is a lot of quantitative reality to the interpretation...

kc0003's photo
Wed 12/01/10 11:04 PM
only from your prospective. from mine it was a simply equation, with a direct correlation between the tax and an act (that being biting) it assumes nothing beyond that. you introduced any and all variables after the givens were explained.