Topic: 'US troops beheaded Iraqi detainee'
Bestinshow's photo
Fri 10/29/10 02:54 PM
The troops operated under the command of an unnamed US major, who had been involved in the rape of an Iraqi female, showed one such document posted on the whistleblower website WikiLeaks.

The incident took place after the victim, the brother of the raped female, reportedly killed a military official in reprisal for the indecent assault.

To enable the May incident in the city of Haditha of the western Iraq province of Al Anbar, the major said he was undertaking the transfer of two prisoners, including the victim.

WikiLeaks has released around 400,000 documents on the 2003-present US-led invasion of Iraq. The founder of the website, Julian Assange, has hailed the disclosure as one "about the truth" behind the war.

The site has also exposed documents on the similar US-led war in Afghanistan and is expected to disclose additional related details.

The following is the body of the original document .

___ DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: ON 25MAY09, MAJOR ___ (SWAT CDR) AND COL (___) TOLD -___ LEADERSHIP THAT THEY WERE GOING TO DELIVER TWO DETAINEES TO ___ IN THE NORTH BECAUSE THERE WAS MORE INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE ON THE TWO DETAINEES IN ___ THAN IN HADITHAH. WHILE ___ NORTH, MAJ ___ HIS CONVOY TO PULL OVER AND TRANSFER THE TWO DETAINEES TO HIS UNCLE AND FOUR BROTHERS. ACCORDING TO COL , ___ IP FOUND ONE OF THE DETAINEES DECAPITATED AND THE OTHER WAS RELEASED BY MAJ ' ___ MEMBERS. MAJ ___ CURRENTLY IN IP CUSTODY.
OVER A YEAR AGO MAJ ___ RELIEVED AS HADITHAH SWAT CDR DUE TO HIS ALLEGED INVOLVEMENT IN THE RAPING OF A FEMALE LOCAL NATIONAL. THE BEHEADED DETAINEE IS REPORTED TO BE THE BROTHER OF THE RAPED FEMALE WHO ALLEGEDLY KILLED MAJ ' ___ IN RETALIATION FOR THE RAPING OF HIS ___.

HN/MMA
Related Stories:
'US-led soldier raped Iraqi girl'
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/148265.html

no photo
Mon 11/01/10 04:54 PM
Nature knows no indecencies; man invents them.
~Mark Twain, Notebook, 1935

Bestinshow's photo
Mon 11/01/10 05:03 PM

Nature knows no indecencies; man invents them.
~Mark Twain, Notebook, 1935



"Some of the character traits exhibited by serial killers or criminals may be observed in many within the political arena... [They] share the traits of psychopaths who are not sensitive to altruistic appeals, such as sympathy for their victims or remorse or guilt over their crimes. They possess the personality traits of lying, narcissism, selfishness, and vanity. These are the people to whom we have entrusted our fate. Is it any wonder that America is failing at home and world-wide?"
Jim Kouri

Lpdon's photo
Mon 11/01/10 09:34 PM
I take everything Wikileaks with a grain of salt. They arn't even respected in the Liberal world of journalism and mass media.

Bestinshow's photo
Tue 11/02/10 02:00 AM

I take everything Wikileaks with a grain of salt. They arn't even respected in the Liberal world of journalism and mass media.
of course you do

boredinaz06's photo
Tue 11/02/10 10:46 AM



I believe one has to be in shallow end of the intellectual pool to believe anything from a source that begins with "wiki"! And and eye for an eye is something terrorists understand anyway so I don't see a problem if they did cut someones head off, if these people over there attracted the attention of our military then that means they were up to no good.

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/02/10 11:30 AM




I believe one has to be in shallow end of the intellectual pool to believe anything from a source that begins with "wiki"! And and eye for an eye is something terrorists understand anyway so I don't see a problem if they did cut someones head off, if these people over there attracted the attention of our military then that means they were up to no good.


if any of this did happen, they should prosecute the rape part, or at least look into it if the guy that did it is dead.... but the whole thing sounds like a lefty plot to discredit our soldiers

Bestinshow's photo
Tue 11/02/10 12:34 PM




I believe one has to be in shallow end of the intellectual pool to believe anything from a source that begins with "wiki"! And and eye for an eye is something terrorists understand anyway so I don't see a problem if they did cut someones head off, if these people over there attracted the attention of our military then that means they were up to no good.
The documents are not in disupute. Your cracking me up laugh

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/02/10 03:28 PM





I believe one has to be in shallow end of the intellectual pool to believe anything from a source that begins with "wiki"! And and eye for an eye is something terrorists understand anyway so I don't see a problem if they did cut someones head off, if these people over there attracted the attention of our military then that means they were up to no good.
The documents are not in disupute. Your cracking me up laugh


yea, there is no way anyone could have faked any documents...
whoa

Bestinshow's photo
Tue 11/02/10 03:34 PM






I believe one has to be in shallow end of the intellectual pool to believe anything from a source that begins with "wiki"! And and eye for an eye is something terrorists understand anyway so I don't see a problem if they did cut someones head off, if these people over there attracted the attention of our military then that means they were up to no good.
The documents are not in disupute. Your cracking me up laugh


yea, there is no way anyone could have faked any documents...
whoa
Oh believe me if they were fake Fox news would be blareing it 24/7 instead of the dribble that our war crimes should be kept secret from the public.laugh

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/02/10 03:38 PM
if there were some crimes committed, then they should be punished... but just because someone publishes a piece of paper RIGHT BEFORE ELECTIONS. really doesn't mean very much...

Bestinshow's photo
Tue 11/02/10 03:41 PM

if there were some crimes committed, then they should be punished... but just because someone publishes a piece of paper RIGHT BEFORE ELECTIONS. really doesn't mean very much...
Trust me on this google untill your fingers bleed all you will find on the wiki leaks is that the government wishes they never got leaked and are seeking to prosecute the leakers. Wikileaks was the media the leaker chose to use being that they have a reputation for getting the facts out. A mainstream media would have probably burried the stuff for national security reasons.

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/02/10 03:45 PM


if there were some crimes committed, then they should be punished... but just because someone publishes a piece of paper RIGHT BEFORE ELECTIONS. really doesn't mean very much...
Trust me on this google untill your fingers bleed all you will find on the wiki leaks is that the government wishes they never got leaked and are seeking to prosecute the leakers. Wikileaks was the media the leaker chose to use being that they have a reputation for getting the facts out. A mainstream media would have probably burried the stuff for national security reasons.


did you ever think maybe people in the government use that to their advantage? there is a reason it was never shut down... and obama has an internet kill switch...i just think there might some truth to it, but more than likely someone in the government made it up just to make republicans look bad before the elections...

Bestinshow's photo
Tue 11/02/10 03:51 PM



if there were some crimes committed, then they should be punished... but just because someone publishes a piece of paper RIGHT BEFORE ELECTIONS. really doesn't mean very much...
Trust me on this google untill your fingers bleed all you will find on the wiki leaks is that the government wishes they never got leaked and are seeking to prosecute the leakers. Wikileaks was the media the leaker chose to use being that they have a reputation for getting the facts out. A mainstream media would have probably burried the stuff for national security reasons.


did you ever think maybe people in the government use that to their advantage? there is a reason it was never shut down... and obama has an internet kill switch...i just think there might some truth to it, but more than likely someone in the government made it up just to make republicans look bad before the elections...
doubt it since Obama has continued the same policies. It makes us all look bad.

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/02/10 04:00 PM




if there were some crimes committed, then they should be punished... but just because someone publishes a piece of paper RIGHT BEFORE ELECTIONS. really doesn't mean very much...
Trust me on this google untill your fingers bleed all you will find on the wiki leaks is that the government wishes they never got leaked and are seeking to prosecute the leakers. Wikileaks was the media the leaker chose to use being that they have a reputation for getting the facts out. A mainstream media would have probably burried the stuff for national security reasons.


did you ever think maybe people in the government use that to their advantage? there is a reason it was never shut down... and obama has an internet kill switch...i just think there might some truth to it, but more than likely someone in the government made it up just to make republicans look bad before the elections...
doubt it since Obama has continued the same policies. It makes us all look bad.
lol..won't argue there...but obama ain't much smarter than bush...lol