Topic: A U.S. District Judge said | |
---|---|
No gays are not pushing to be "more equal than everyone else".
Gays are treated as second class citizens in many arenas in this country and government. That needs to be changed and this law needs to be changed. Hetero people are just going to have adjust to the fact that other people are not like them and it is okay. |
|
|
|
No gays are not pushing to be "more equal than everyone else". Gays are treated as second class citizens in many arenas in this country and government. That needs to be changed and this law needs to be changed. Hetero people are just going to have adjust to the fact that other people are not like them and it is okay. phtttttttttt |
|
|
|
ok...let me pose this question. There are homosexuals in the military now. They just aren't allowed to let people know. If there isn't a problem now, why would there be a problem if it is known, except to those that are against it? let me give an example of how,, I am not AGAINST heterosexual males, I assume they have the propensity to be sexually attracted to any female(including myself), therefore if I were in a high stress environment where my time to rest and shower were limited, I would not want to be spending that time worrying about the potential lust or advances of a heterosexual male If I knew a male was homosexual, I wouldnt care about him being in my barracks, If I later found out he was indeed HETERO,, then there would be a problem If my husband were sharing a hotel room with a female under the impresson she was homosexual,, no problem,,, if it came to light she was heterosexual BIG PROBLEM a homosexual male giving me a backrub has an entirely different potential implication than a female heterosexual a pat on the behind can be seen as friendly or inappropriate depending upon the sexual inclination of the party doing the patting,, etc,,,etc,,, of course, all we see on the surface is whether someone is male or female and MOST of us will naturally see those of the same sex as similarly inclined,,,therefore not feeling that same potential implication for inappropriate emotions or advances UNLESS we learn that they are indeed NOT similarly inclined,,, I know that wasnt simple, but its what I got for now Some men have very effeminate qualities and they don’t have to be gay to have them. Some gay men are heavily endowed with macho, brute, qualities. Women run the same the spectrum – from the most feminine to the very masculine – again regardless of sexual orientation. NONE of those qualities will dictate the behavior of any given individual. Humans are NOT ‘driven’ by their sexual desire. Except in cases of mental incapacity, we all have the ability to control our behavior. In the military, from the information available, it would seem that the percentage rate of incidents of sexual harassment and assault within the military are closely correlated with that of the general public. That means everyone in the barracks has the same chance of being sexually harassed or assaulted as the rest of the general public. So there is no greater risk due to the living arrangements than there is outside the military living in your OWN home. |
|
|
|
ok...let me pose this question. There are homosexuals in the military now. They just aren't allowed to let people know. If there isn't a problem now, why would there be a problem if it is known, except to those that are against it? let me ask this..why does it need to change? why doe they need it known? At this point in the thread, if you have to ask the question, you wouldn't understand the answer anyway. Nice to see ya still trying though. |
|
|
|
Hi Dragoness |
|
|
|
Hi Dragoness Hi |
|
|