100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: What Hath Gore Wrought ... ? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
What a nutjob...of course I understand his frustation at people who resist climate change legislations and acknowledgement of the dire situations to come. Climate change is real and it's being added to by man's use of fossil fuels. The people opposed to action are representing Big Oil and Big Pollution for short term profits over the long term consequenses of doing nothing about global climate change and air and water quality issues. By 2050 people will be wondering what we were thinking, as the sea level rises and kicks billions of people from the shores and the air is not healthy to breathe, the water too polluted to drink. This will be our legacy? So saying that we need mass sterilization to cut the population is an acceptable way to deal with global warming? You know as well I as do that abortion and sterilization of undesirables has been a plank in the progressive movement's platform since the early 20th century. This is no surprise.. Gee, talk about spin, I was not addressing the absurdities of the nutjob. This "sterilzation" crap is CT at it's worse. And also spun like hair stuck woven in a road apple is the notion that Al Gore intended this sort of radicalism as a way to help save the planet...egads man! Why do "conservatives" hate it when people talk about conserving the planet? Is is more impportant to conserve profits for corporate greed? Finish the movie yet? Everybody should see The Corporation. it's free on HULU. I have no problem with conservation. I have a problem with left wing environazis who think that the earth is going to explode tomorrow if we don't go back into the stone age. Sure, and the supressing of the Clean Air Act was a liberal thing then. I'm not sure how the clean air act coincides with my previous reply. Since I am not a member of congress I have no power or authority to suppress any law.. My position is 1.clean air good... 2.over regulation and environmental terrorists bad.. Well okay then, Richard Nixon signed the Clean Air Act of 1974, after that the coal industry was required to upgrade their plants that would remove about 93% of emissions. It was working until The Dippic was elected and he hog tied the EPA from enforcing the law. Again, the point is that the GOP will kill ANY regulation that cleans our planet if it gets in the way of some company's profits. Get it? Got it? Gooood. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a nutjob...of course I understand his frustation at people who resist climate change legislations and acknowledgement of the dire situations to come. Climate change is real and it's being added to by man's use of fossil fuels. The people opposed to action are representing Big Oil and Big Pollution for short term profits over the long term consequenses of doing nothing about global climate change and air and water quality issues. By 2050 people will be wondering what we were thinking, as the sea level rises and kicks billions of people from the shores and the air is not healthy to breathe, the water too polluted to drink. This will be our legacy? So saying that we need mass sterilization to cut the population is an acceptable way to deal with global warming? You know as well I as do that abortion and sterilization of undesirables has been a plank in the progressive movement's platform since the early 20th century. This is no surprise.. Gee, talk about spin, I was not addressing the absurdities of the nutjob. This "sterilzation" crap is CT at it's worse. And also spun like hair stuck woven in a road apple is the notion that Al Gore intended this sort of radicalism as a way to help save the planet...egads man! Why do "conservatives" hate it when people talk about conserving the planet? Is is more impportant to conserve profits for corporate greed? Finish the movie yet? Everybody should see The Corporation. it's free on HULU. I have no problem with conservation. I have a problem with left wing environazis who think that the earth is going to explode tomorrow if we don't go back into the stone age. Sure, and the supressing of the Clean Air Act was a liberal thing then. I'm not sure how the clean air act coincides with my previous reply. Since I am not a member of congress I have no power or authority to suppress any law.. My position is 1.clean air good... 2.over regulation and environmental terrorists bad.. Well okay then, Richard Nixon signed the Clean Air Act of 1974, after that the coal industry was required to upgrade their plants that would remove about 93% of emissions. It was working until The Dippic was elected and he hog tied the EPA from enforcing the law. Again, the point is that the GOP will kill ANY regulation that cleans our planet if it gets in the way of some company's profits. Get it? Got it? Gooood. Even Tricky Dick was more moral than The Dippic... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfffffffffffff ...
 ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poster child for the Liberal Progressives. They call him hero. I call him worm food. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfffffffffffff ... ...
Couldn't have sai dit better myself. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a nutjob...of course I understand his frustation at people who resist climate change legislations and acknowledgement of the dire situations to come. Climate change is real and it's being added to by man's use of fossil fuels. The people opposed to action are representing Big Oil and Big Pollution for short term profits over the long term consequenses of doing nothing about global climate change and air and water quality issues. By 2050 people will be wondering what we were thinking, as the sea level rises and kicks billions of people from the shores and the air is not healthy to breathe, the water too polluted to drink. This will be our legacy? So saying that we need mass sterilization to cut the population is an acceptable way to deal with global warming? You know as well I as do that abortion and sterilization of undesirables has been a plank in the progressive movement's platform since the early 20th century. This is no surprise.. Gee, talk about spin, I was not addressing the absurdities of the nutjob. This "sterilzation" crap is CT at it's worse. And also spun like hair stuck woven in a road apple is the notion that Al Gore intended this sort of radicalism as a way to help save the planet...egads man! Why do "conservatives" hate it when people talk about conserving the planet? Is is more impportant to conserve profits for corporate greed? Finish the movie yet? Everybody should see The Corporation. it's free on HULU. I have no problem with conservation. I have a problem with left wing environazis who think that the earth is going to explode tomorrow if we don't go back into the stone age. Sure, and the supressing of the Clean Air Act was a liberal thing then. I'm not sure how the clean air act coincides with my previous reply. Since I am not a member of congress I have no power or authority to suppress any law.. My position is 1.clean air good... 2.over regulation and environmental terrorists bad.. Well okay then, Richard Nixon signed the Clean Air Act of 1974, after that the coal industry was required to upgrade their plants that would remove about 93% of emissions. It was working until The Dippic was elected and he hog tied the EPA from enforcing the law. Again, the point is that the GOP will kill ANY regulation that cleans our planet if it gets in the way of some company's profits. Get it? Got it? Gooood.
|
|
|
|
|
