Topic: Update: California Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional | |
---|---|
Update: California Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional
Wednesday 04 August 2010 by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that California’s ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. The announcement was made on Wednesday 1:40 PST as pro-LGBT rights rallies erupted in San Francisco and across the country. Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled that Proposition 8, a memorandum approved by California voters in Nov. 2008, violates the US constitution by denying same-sex couples the right to marry. Proponents of Prop. 8 have already prepared to file an appeal. Last spring the American Foundation for Equal Rights filed a suit on behalf of two gay couples whose marriage plans were canceled by Proposition 8. Attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies argued on behalf of the plaintiffs that Proposition 8 violates basic constitutional rights, denies Americans basic liberties and harms both parents and children without due process. This “disfavored” legal status singles out LGBT people as “second class citizens,” according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. Olsen and Bois argued against each other in Bush v. Gore, the case that decided that 2000 election. Plaintiffs Kris Perry and Sandy Steir have been together for ten years and are the parents of four boys. Partners Paul Katami and Jeff Zarrillo joined Perry and Steir in challenging Proposition 8, which denied both couples the right to marry. “I want to marry Sandy. I want to have a stable and secure relationship with her that then we can include our children in,” Perry testified during the trial. “And I want the discrimination we are feeling with Proposition 8 to end and for a more positive, joyful part of our lives to begin.” Vaughn heard three weeks of arguments in January, which ranged from heated to lighthearted as expert witness, Proposition 8 proponents and hopeful gay couples debated the legitimacy of LGBT families. Final arguments were presented in June. Visit www.Truthout.org for updates on this historic case. |
|
|
|
america is slowly sinking into the depths of self mutilation. i just hope i am around long enough to say "i told you so" |
|
|
|
Who ever heard alike? Need to be forced back in the closet then set on fire!
|
|
|
|
Well, thats a positive step...
|
|
|
|
personally i think marriage is unconstitutional
|
|
|
|
One Small step for man... One giant leap for man
|
|
|
|
These threads sure bring out what everyone needs to see in people.
|
|
|
|
They sure do! Do they not?
|
|
|
|
Oops. I missed this thread when I posted mine. Sorry!! Maybe the mods can remove mine.
Great ruling, though. |
|
|
|
america is slowly sinking into the depths of self mutilation. i just hope i am around long enough to say "i told you so" Wow. That's about the only comment I have for this. |
|
|
|
Makes sense
|
|
|
|
i bet divorce attorneys are licking their chops
|
|
|
|
LOL!!
|
|
|
|
They might have to Mandate!! LOL
|
|
|
|
Update: California Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional Wednesday 04 August 2010 by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that California’s ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. The announcement was made on Wednesday 1:40 PST as pro-LGBT rights rallies erupted in San Francisco and across the country. Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled that Proposition 8, a memorandum approved by California voters in Nov. 2008, violates the US constitution by denying same-sex couples the right to marry. Proponents of Prop. 8 have already prepared to file an appeal. Last spring the American Foundation for Equal Rights filed a suit on behalf of two gay couples whose marriage plans were canceled by Proposition 8. Attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies argued on behalf of the plaintiffs that Proposition 8 violates basic constitutional rights, denies Americans basic liberties and harms both parents and children without due process. This “disfavored” legal status singles out LGBT people as “second class citizens,” according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. Olsen and Bois argued against each other in Bush v. Gore, the case that decided that 2000 election. Plaintiffs Kris Perry and Sandy Steir have been together for ten years and are the parents of four boys. Partners Paul Katami and Jeff Zarrillo joined Perry and Steir in challenging Proposition 8, which denied both couples the right to marry. “I want to marry Sandy. I want to have a stable and secure relationship with her that then we can include our children in,” Perry testified during the trial. “And I want the discrimination we are feeling with Proposition 8 to end and for a more positive, joyful part of our lives to begin.” Vaughn heard three weeks of arguments in January, which ranged from heated to lighthearted as expert witness, Proposition 8 proponents and hopeful gay couples debated the legitimacy of LGBT families. Final arguments were presented in June. Visit www.Truthout.org for updates on this historic case. Hey quit generalizing all Republicans. I am very much in support of Gay Marriage, I stopped supporting it after the Perez Hilton Miss America discrimination incident, but then realized why fight the rights over one idiot. |
|
|
|
Well, thats a positive step... One that Canada took a long time ago too. |
|
|
|
Update: California Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional Wednesday 04 August 2010 by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that California’s ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. The announcement was made on Wednesday 1:40 PST as pro-LGBT rights rallies erupted in San Francisco and across the country. Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled that Proposition 8, a memorandum approved by California voters in Nov. 2008, violates the US constitution by denying same-sex couples the right to marry. Proponents of Prop. 8 have already prepared to file an appeal. Last spring the American Foundation for Equal Rights filed a suit on behalf of two gay couples whose marriage plans were canceled by Proposition 8. Attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies argued on behalf of the plaintiffs that Proposition 8 violates basic constitutional rights, denies Americans basic liberties and harms both parents and children without due process. This “disfavored” legal status singles out LGBT people as “second class citizens,” according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. Olsen and Bois argued against each other in Bush v. Gore, the case that decided that 2000 election. Plaintiffs Kris Perry and Sandy Steir have been together for ten years and are the parents of four boys. Partners Paul Katami and Jeff Zarrillo joined Perry and Steir in challenging Proposition 8, which denied both couples the right to marry. “I want to marry Sandy. I want to have a stable and secure relationship with her that then we can include our children in,” Perry testified during the trial. “And I want the discrimination we are feeling with Proposition 8 to end and for a more positive, joyful part of our lives to begin.” Vaughn heard three weeks of arguments in January, which ranged from heated to lighthearted as expert witness, Proposition 8 proponents and hopeful gay couples debated the legitimacy of LGBT families. Final arguments were presented in June. Visit www.Truthout.org for updates on this historic case. Hey quit generalizing all Republicans. I am very much in support of Gay Marriage, I stopped supporting it after the Perez Hilton Miss America discrimination incident, but then realized why fight the rights over one idiot. Where does it say all Republicans? |
|
|
|
Unfortunately this judges ruling is going to get overturned because he is biased in this case. It turns out that he is gay and has a potential sate in this case being he has a partner he wants to marry.
|
|
|
|
Oh hell ... let's take this to its ultimate absurd conclusion: California is unconstitutional. There. Happy?
|
|
|
|
Oh hell ... let's take this to its ultimate absurd conclusion: California is unconstitutional. There. Happy? |
|
|