Topic: Simulation Finds 9/11 Fireproofing Key | |
---|---|
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - A computer simulation of the 2001 World Trade Center
attacks supports a federal agency's findings that the initial impact from the hijacked airplanes stripped away crucial fireproofing material and that the weakened towers collapsed under their own weight. The two-year Purdue University study, funded in part by the National Science Foundation, was the first to use 3-D animation to provide visual context to the attacks, said Christoph Hoffmann, a professor of computer science and one of the lead researchers on the project. |
|
|
|
Do you think this will put away the 9/11 conspiracy theories?
|
|
|
|
No.
Who ever wants to believe in conspiracy will continue to do so. |
|
|
|
Hey andrea
|
|
|
|
Hi fellow cat
|
|
|
|
meow.......
|
|
|
|
As long as you don't start barking at me.
|
|
|
|
I WAS A CAT IN A FORMER LIFETIME. I WAS AN OCELOT.
|
|
|
|
and what promises were made to him to say that???
how heavy is it next to the testimonies of everyone on the other side... it may be a point ...but i am not soooooooooo sure this is the end of this story hi Fanta andrea |
|
|
|
geee...a report funded by the government supports the government
story?.... sure..I'll take a seat on that titanic..what bs |
|
|
|
great pic Bill! Where did you come up with that? |
|
|
|
A two year Purdue University Study! How many young students do you
reckon were involved in concocting that fake information, devinci? And they are keeping them all quiet about it. How do you rckon they make that happen? Threatened their parents lifes? This conspiracy grows with the number of participants everyday. They should recruit them all in the CIA. This has to be the best kept secret in the country! Maybe, they drugged them all AYE!!! I dont buy it!!! |
|
|
|
AW Cmon guys.
The government my do stupid things from time to time but they are not stupid. If they wanted to put this conspiricy hogwash to rest they would just 'secretly' fund a few well placed unattached 'think tanks' with 'black funds' and bury us all with 'scientificlly valid' data. Not through governmentaly funded foundations but lots of 'independent' ones. Much like the C-Theroy people are doing but with real science and not schemetic science. |
|
|
|
Oooooooooh I get it! You're stabbing the old funny bone, eh AB?
Good show! |
|
|
|
Like I said, I don't buy the conspiracy. There would have to be at least
a couple thousand people, all keeping complete secrecy about this grand scheme. Hell, they cant get five people to stick with the same story without at least one of them leaking the story to the press! Now we are supposed to believe a couple hundred College students, a few professors, and everyone involved in the National Science foundation are all keeping the secret about false results in a study???? Not Likely!!! |
|
|
|
you don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that when the fire
heated the beams in the towers to about 1400 degrees F. (red hot) the beams lost most of their strength and were no longer able to support the weight above them. When the floors above colapsed, the whole building went down. If you notice, the building that was hit the lowest went first because there was more weight above the the failed beams was much greater. As for the conspiracy theory, if you believe that perhaps you would be interested in the little piece of land I have been trying to sell down by the swamp. One side faces the water, the top. |
|
|
|
fanta...100 professors question 911 government report
http://www.wanttoknow.info/070618professorsquestion911 "Hell, they cant get five people to stick with the same story without at least one of them leaking the story to the press! Now we are supposed to believe a couple hundred College students, a few professors," gee the list of professional nut jobs is getting larger I guess... |
|
|
|
Kool-aid, get your kool-aid here. Don't forget your souvenir tin-foil
hat. Get yer Two-Shooters burger, just step right up! |
|
|
|
gotta love people that live life wearing blinders...
|
|
|
|
You know what's funny? People who cry to anyone who'll listen about
how the "Man" or the "System" or my favorite "The Goverment"(as if those were their names) is robbing us of our freedoms and suppressing the "Truth" about everything from what's in your Oreos to what happened on 9/11 and THEN when an opposite view is offered they say that you want to believe whatever you're told or that *ahem* "You gotta love people that live life wearing blinders." Why is their viewpoint less valid than your's? Because you don't agree with it? Congratulations, you and POTUS belong to the same club. Better yet, you, POTUS, AND Osama Bin Laden belong to the same club since it would seem that none of you believe any viewpoint is valid except your's. Personally I think that 9/11 was the work of terrorists. Am I saying I know what happened that day? Nope, and anyone who says they know is full it. As Fanta said earlier, you're asking thousands of people to keep a secret that could wreck our country destroying everything we stand for and making us more despicable than our worst enemies. Think about that, most people can't keep a secret any longer than it takes them to find someone to tell said secret. That isn't my point though, my point is that even if you don't agree with someone you should at LEAST listen to them on the off-chance they know something that *gasp* you don't. |
|
|