I'm glad you joined this site, and that you are offering your questions and ideas.



Hey, don't trust us! Some of us like to redefine words to fit our worldview.


I think a good question is:

Is 'understanding' necessary for a response?

If I push on something, and it moves away. Do we consider that a response? This the way in which I think "air" can respond to us. For me, I don't consider that 'understanding'.

that is not understanding, when the object moves physically that could be force in larger sense, but if anything responds to a emotion that that can probably qualified as a reponse, i got to know that water responds to emotional attitude towards it..

What if the 'response to emotion' is due to physical forces? It seems very plausible to me that water might dry from my body faster depending on my emotional state, as emotions can influence the temperature of my skin. Emotion can also influence the oiliness of my skin, which could effect water on my skin.



Will you tell us more about this?

PLEASE Google (Emoto- water experiments)

Though I think its possible to influence the molecular structure of water with the WILL POWER... But I'm afraid this idea would frick some materialistic people out (i.e. those who consider themselves "scientists")! LOL and I will have to deal with numerous emails afterwards...

Oh well...

running water always tells me....."i know you have to pee, go ahead"

air though tends to say "shhhhhhhh"

my water talks to me

it says it would prefer if we found another way for toilets to work

... ...

(((((((( ... ))))))))

What about it crying out loud while you pee???
* * * * * *
| |

i think it tickles, because the water giggles at me

Wait until it starts googlin' ya ...

imagine: UPRISING of the ELEMENTS!!!

Oh, so this is not based on personal experiences/observation? Not that it matters - its just that I had simply assumed it was.

I may look into this in a few days...unless someone copies and pastes something of interest here.

So this Emoto guy freezes water and photographs it...wait, no, thats misleading. Any honest person who wants to see whether water is influenced by emotions would have a procedure for taking the photographs which removes personal bias, personal aesthetics. Perhaps they would automate the image capturing process, and make sure that all captured images are preserved as part of the 'data'.

But this guy, he hires photographers, apparently to create the kind of photograph that he wants. How many photos are discarded before he chooses the 'representative photo' that he wants?

Further, anyone who has done photography knows that the intention of the photographer can strongly influence the image derived.

Then he or his devotees publish all these photos, with a one to one correspondence between the photo and the 'emotion' label....leading the naive viewer to believe that that image is the image of that emotion. How ignorant is that? There is no reason to assume that any particular photo of a water crystal is representative of the water crystals formed by that water sample. None.


Maybe if you were to set up a camera to automatically take dozens (or hundreds!) of photographs, without the influence of human bias, aesthetics, preference, selection... and then ALL of the photos were published, together, just maybe, have a basis for showing a 'trend'.


The fact that there are people out there who consider this guys photographs 'evidence' of 'emotions effecting water' is simply a testament to the lack of thinking skills in the general population.


This is what is evidenced by these photos: the general trend of water to form crystalline structures with a certain geometry, such as the hexagonal structure, due (I'm told) to the 120 degree angle between hydrogen bonds on the oxygen.

Someone ought to the inverse of what he is doing, just to show how silly this is - and publish all the details.

Take a drop of water, subject it to 'angry' thoughts, and take the most beautiful picture they can.

Then take a drop of water, subject it to 'happy' thoughts, and take the worst picture then can.

When I said that yes water does respond and communicate. I meant was... well, I can't really explaing what I meant, but let's take me fish tank for example. The water is "telling" that there is something wrong. It is white and cloudy. Even my fish are "saying" something is wrong. They have a dull color, and their eyes are bad, their vision is even somewhat impaired.

I have been treating them with medicine, and they are getting better (able to see better, eyes less swollen, more active, etc.). My fish seem to be "telling" me that they are feeling better, not fully recovered, but the medicine seems to be working so far.

My water seems to be "telling" me things are still not right, which I am aware of the problem/s.

Nature does "speak" in many different ways, and of course it responds.

My cat has developed a "language", a mixture of "meows" and actions to "speak" to me. I have also developed actions, tones, etc. to "speak" to him. For example he knows that when I clap my hands once and say his name in a certain tone, that means that he has done something unfavorable. He will usually stop doing whatever he was doing and give me a short "meow" and walk away.

I'm not exactly sure where I was going with this, but then again this thread isn't making much sense either, so there.

I believe it! More and more they are finding that some animals teach each other how to better communicate.

I'm very talkative around close family and friends, so when I'm home, I will talk alot. My cat has become very "meowy" over the past few years, since I have been living with my mom and nephew. When I was living alone, I had no one to talk to, so I didnt talk as much, and my cat didn't meow as much.

It is interesting how animals develop ways to commuicate with us.