Topic: A Dangerous Precedent? | |
---|---|
so she got a boob reduction....and? But not really yellow, seems as if she was RESTORED to what nature gave her,,for the purpose of competing. I would feel different if NATURE Made her endowed and she went under a knife just to compete. but it was her choice to do so...regardless of her reasons. They are her reasons. I don't see it setting a bad precedent though |
|
|
|
She got her breast enhancement reversed... there are many women that do that for whatever reason.
There are lots of female athletes that are not flat chested.... even so in track. |
|
|
|
Please don't feed the trolls.
ONLY ONE WOMAN HAS ENOUGH NERVE TO PLAY IN THIS THREAD??????????????? COME ON, LADIES. "Nerve?" It never occurred to you that other women might agree with the '13 yo boy' comment, and decided not to encourage you with a response? |
|
|
|
I wonder if her insurance covered the procedure?
|
|
|
|
TJ...she is Australian so I don't know what kind of coverage she has
|
|
|
|
Her body, her choice. That's it.
|
|
|
|
TJ...she is Australian so I don't know what kind of coverage she has I think they have a national system them. Not sure. Was just wondering. |
|
|
|
From Fox News.com "Fair and Balanced"... (but,isn't one usually just a little larger than the other?) ____________________________________________________________________ Australian athlete Jana Rawlinson had breast implants removed to boost performance in track. An Australian track star had her breast implants removed in an attempt to boost her chances of winning a medal at the 2012 Olympics. In a magazine interview, Jana Rawlinson admitted she spent $13,000 in the past 14 months getting her breasts enhanced — only to have the cosmetic procedure reversed. Fair and Balanced. Hahaha It's a shame that she didn't think about all of this before she went under the knife the first time. If she did, she wouldn't be having surgery a second time. Welcome to Mingle, silly. |
|
|
|
TJ...she is Australian so I don't know what kind of coverage she has Rose, she admitted to having spent spent $13,000 for the initial surgery. I assume that she would have to pay for the second surgery herself since it's considered to be an elective surgery. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Wed 01/06/10 06:48 PM
|
|
Please don't feed the trolls. ONLY ONE WOMAN HAS ENOUGH NERVE TO PLAY IN THIS THREAD??????????????? COME ON, LADIES. "Nerve?" It never occurred to you that other women might agree with the '13 yo boy' comment, and decided not to encourage you with a response? Nawww...he's not a troll. That's his sense of humor. |
|
|
|
TJ...she is Australian so I don't know what kind of coverage she has Rose, she admitted to having spent spent $13,000 for the initial surgery. I assume that she would have to pay for the second surgery herself since it's considered to be an elective surgery. that's fine. I was just letting TJ know (in case he missed it) that they might have different health care than the states |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I once had a leg removed to enter a one legged @$$ kickin' contest. Took first place!! Then I had it sewn back on.
|
|
|
|
I once had a leg removed to enter a one legged @$$ kickin' contest. Took first place!! Then I had it sewn back on. Now here's a woman with a sense of humor! Winx, thanks for having my back! |
|
|
|
the old Amazon warriors used to remover the breast on the side of their bow arm to keep the bow string from twangin it (youch) That's another myth written by the Romans. Helped keep their women under control and afraid. Negate the "female" aspect of women warriors by degrading them. I've never had issues using a bow on the ground or on the horse and having my boobs get in the way. No matter how I twisted and turned. |
|
|
|
I once had a leg removed to enter a one legged @$$ kickin' contest. Took first place!! Then I had it sewn back on. Now here's a woman with a sense of humor! Winx, thanks for having my back! You're welcome, Stl1. |
|
|
|
Weirdness, totally weird.
|
|
|