| Topic: Should love be based on fascination? | |
|---|---|
Should love be based on fascination?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what?
Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... |
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no.
Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. |
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what?
Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.
eh, illustration purposes...
If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris. |
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.
Tiger isn't my type either
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what?
Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither
Tricky monkey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.
eh, illustration purposes...
If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris. I agree. Azz is what I would want rather than Paris
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fascination with what?
Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither
Tricky monkey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
I agree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard
It usually is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard
I have heard that too
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes
Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard
It usually is.
Indeed
|
|
|
|
|
Should love be based on fascination?
LOVE...Such a complexed 4 letter word,an feeling?
|
|
|
|
|
Should love be based on fascination?
me neither
I agree