Community > Dating & Relationships

Previous 1 2 3 Next

Topic: Should love be based on fascination?
MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:21 PM
Should love be based on fascination?

Calleigh12 Joined Tue 04/01/08 Posts: 17193	Thu 12/17/09 01:22 PM
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it......

Ladylid2012 Joined Sun 07/05/09 Posts: 42269	Thu 12/17/09 01:24 PM
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods.

Calleigh12 Joined Tue 04/01/08 Posts: 17193	Thu 12/17/09 01:25 PM
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type.

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:26 PM
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:27 PM
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods.

Ladylid2012 Joined Sun 07/05/09 Posts: 42269	Thu 12/17/09 01:27 PM
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type. eh, illustration purposes... If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris.

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:27 PM
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type. Tiger isn't my type either

Calleigh12 Joined Tue 04/01/08 Posts: 17193	Thu 12/17/09 01:28 PM
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither Tricky monkey.

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:28 PM
love is fascinating in itself..should a relationship be based on that, no. Then we would all want to be in love with Paris Hilton or Tiger Woods. Eh, I don't like girls and Tiger isn't my type. eh, illustration purposes... If I was into girls I'd want one with an azz, not Paris. I agree. Azz is what I would want rather than Paris

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:29 PM
Fascination with what? Love itself? The person? I don't get it...... me neither Tricky monkey.

PATSFAN Joined Mon 12/10/07 Posts: 42782	Thu 12/17/09 01:37 PM
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:37 PM


MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:38 PM
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes I agree

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:39 PM


Ladylid2012 Joined Sun 07/05/09 Posts: 42269	Thu 12/17/09 01:40 PM
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard

Calleigh12 Joined Tue 04/01/08 Posts: 17193	Thu 12/17/09 01:41 PM
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard It usually is.

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:42 PM
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard I have heard that too

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Thu 12/17/09 01:43 PM
If you are fascinated with fantasy, then yes Sometimes the fantasy s better...so I have heard It usually is. Indeed

agrant333 Joined Thu 11/20/08 Posts: 1762	Thu 12/17/09 01:56 PM
Should love be based on fascination? LOVE...Such a complexed 4 letter word,an feeling?