Topic: The Great Darwin | |
---|---|
Prove to me he is not a fruit cake.
Anyone with half a brain would know we did not climb out of the sea became a monkey and then a human. Prove this ain't so? Can You?....Miles |
|
|
|
Edited by
jrbogie
on
Tue 12/01/09 10:42 AM
|
|
as i think you are a believer in god and some form of creationism, i can't imagine proving anything to you even if i could. your mind seems closed to any possibilities outside what your scripture says. darwin kept an open mind as all scientists do. he proposed a theory and not a "fact" as is proposed in the bible. the theory is still being studied as a theory more than 150 years later by other open minded biologists some who take their families to church every day. why not catch up with one of them and make your challenge for proof of darwin's sanity? would you accuse a fellow faithful of being half brained?
|
|
|
|
I believe no one can prove they do not believe or what other people don't understand. I, myself, believe in Creation and God and not Evolution...Can I prove it to other people? No, I can't because I have Faith and I would not make other people believe as I do |
|
|
|
I believe no one can prove they do not believe or what other people don't understand. I, myself, believe in Creation and God and not Evolution...Can I prove it to other people? No, I can't because I have Faith and I would not make other people believe as I do No you can't prove it because you have faith in it. You believe in creation without any kind of real scientific evidence. People who like to think freely and for themselves without being spoon-fed easy answers tend to rely on imperical evidence and hard facts. I would know being a biology major. As for the topic of this forum posting. You can sure try to disprove it ... but unlike creationism it will take a lot more then fancy word-play and infantile fairytales. But from the sound of it ... (water, to monkeys, to humans ... seriously?) ... you don't really understand the theory in the first place. |
|
|
|
Prove to me he is not a fruit cake. Anyone with half a brain would know we did not climb out of the sea became a monkey and then a human. Prove this ain't so? Can You?....Miles This one is easy- Darwin did not say we came from monkeys, in fact his theory clearly states that we did not come from monkeys. BTW, did you know that Darwin's birthday is the same date at Abraham Lincoln's in February? Imagine, the two most avowed enemies of the South sharing the same birthday! |
|
|
|
Prove to me he is not a fruit cake. Anyone with half a brain would know we did not climb out of the sea became a monkey and then a human. Prove this ain't so? Can You?....Miles This one is easy- Darwin did not say we came from monkeys, in fact his theory clearly states that we did not come from monkeys. BTW, did you know that Darwin's birthday is the same date at Abraham Lincoln's in February? Imagine, the two most avowed enemies of the South sharing the same birthday! dang. i was just coming back to edit my earlier post with precisely this. indeed, darwin never theorized that we evolved from monkeys. amusing how some can claim a thinker to be a friut cake without even the education needed to understand what the thinker actually thought. happens often during discussions with the faithful. just try discussing general relativity, singularity and the big bang theory with one of the god fearing. fruit cake will be one of the kinder names you'll be called. |
|
|
|
That's been trying to be proved for countless years and may never be proved. Man very well may have evolved from monkeys, but didn't start there. From a single cell, quite probable. Where did that cell come from? Good question. Are we alone in the universe? Not likely. Is Earth a piece of dust in a very large closet? Who knows. IMO, 'god' is a state of mind. Not a being. Was Jesus a real person? I don't doubt that. Was he the son of god? Going by my idea of 'god' being a state of mind, yes. With that theory, we're all sons/daughters of god. He was merely a prophet of the idea and through interpretations of languages has been misinterpreted. I really don't think that's hard to believe since there's plenty of religions based on Jesus and/or god that are similar, but different. I believe that since by human nature we all want to believe in hope, so religion and the afterlife continues to prosper.
|
|
|
|
Prove to me he is not a fruit cake. Anyone with half a brain would know we did not climb out of the sea became a monkey and then a human. Prove this ain't so? Can You?....Miles |
|
|
|
Evolution can be proven according to the fossil record and that is why it is taught in the science textbooks
|
|
|
|
dog breeding
horse breeding is still evolution with a little push from man |
|
|
|
Good i am glad you all agree with me..
Why should i say stuff about Darwin when i really do not know.. But fair is fair right? So why do you make stuff up about the meaning of the scripture when u have not a clue? They are way way deeper than anything u can imagine....Blessings of Shalom...Miles |
|
|
|
Edited by
Quietman_2009
on
Tue 12/01/09 01:06 PM
|
|
jeez like we don't have too much of that on here already
if it's not a debunk the bible crusade it's a debunk evolution crusade if it's not bash bush crusades it's bash obama crusades and no one here seems capable of carrying out a rational reasoned discussion that doesn't conform to their closed minded bong logic |
|
|
|
jeez like we don't have too much of that on here already if it's not a debunk the bible crusade it's a debunk evolution crusade if it's not bash bush crusades it's bash obama crusades and no one here seems capable of carrying out a rational reasoned discussion that doesn't conform to their closed minded bong logic if someone would really reason and not argue debate. We would see far more discussions.. But the way it is we just get alot of crap...Miles |
|
|
|
if someone would really reason and not argue debate. We would see far more discussions.. But the way it is we just get alot of crap...Miles So you want someone to reason with you, without arguing and debate with you? That sounds more like conversion rehtoric than anything intellectually sound. If you don't understand the theory how can you debunk it? If you have personal bias (beliefs) to cloud your objective reasoning what makes you think it's worth anyone elses time to try to explain anything to you? |
|
|
|
if someone would really reason and not argue debate. We would see far more discussions.. But the way it is we just get alot of crap...Miles So you want someone to reason with you, without arguing and debate with you? That sounds more like conversion rehtoric than anything intellectually sound. If you don't understand the theory how can you debunk it? If you have personal bias (beliefs) to cloud your objective reasoning what makes you think it's worth anyone elses time to try to explain anything to you? They grow alot of grass in Texas I can tell |
|
|
|
Edited by
tohyup
on
Tue 12/01/09 08:11 PM
|
|
Prove to me he is not a fruit cake. Anyone with half a brain would know we did not climb out of the sea became a monkey and then a human. Prove this ain't so? Can You?....Miles I am not religious but I agree . Darwin's theory is full of ridicule . It is impossible for his theory to be a truth . It is against logic and it is against life observation . |
|
|
|
Good i am glad you all agree with me.. Why should i say stuff about Darwin when i really do not know.. But fair is fair right? So why do you make stuff up about the meaning of the scripture when u have not a clue? They are way way deeper than anything u can imagine....Blessings of Shalom...Miles fair is fair. so why are you being unfair? i've never made "stuff up about the meaning of the scripture". i've never asked an absurd question such as "can you prove god?". that would be highly uncalled for and unfair and absurd. and i consider a question like, "can anybody prove that darwin is not a friut cake?" likewise absurd, highly uncalled for and unfair. my morals and ethics don't allow me to engage in such schoolyard name calling. do you derive your moral values that allows you to stoop to such lows from your religion? are you justifying this thread as valid because you've seen other rediculous threads against religion? are you proud that you've achieved a rediculous parity with unbelievers who cannot debate any more effectively than you can? hmmmmmmmm? |
|
|
|
jeez like we don't have too much of that on here already if it's not a debunk the bible crusade it's a debunk evolution crusade if it's not bash bush crusades it's bash obama crusades and no one here seems capable of carrying out a rational reasoned discussion that doesn't conform to their closed minded bong logic if someone would really reason and not argue debate. We would see far more discussions.. But the way it is we just get alot of crap...Miles indeed. crap like asking for proof that darwin was a fruit cake. you authored this discussion. are you pleased with the reasoning that your discussion has elicited? do you now find that people are more likely to care in the least about any future point you might like to make? do you now think that we all feel that we might actually learn from your reasoning? you know, your reasoning that compelled you to author this rediculous discussion that was simply meant to cause discourse? |
|
|
|
Scripture, like most things is open to interpretation, why don't you give us a quote and we can reasonably discuss it.
|
|
|
|
jeez like we don't have too much of that on here already if it's not a debunk the bible crusade it's a debunk evolution crusade if it's not bash bush crusades it's bash obama crusades and no one here seems capable of carrying out a rational reasoned discussion that doesn't conform to their closed minded bong logic if someone would really reason and not argue debate. We would see far more discussions.. But the way it is we just get alot of crap...Miles indeed. crap like asking for proof that darwin was a fruit cake. you authored this discussion. are you pleased with the reasoning that your discussion has elicited? do you now find that people are more likely to care in the least about any future point you might like to make? do you now think that we all feel that we might actually learn from your reasoning? you know, your reasoning that compelled you to author this rediculous discussion that was simply meant to cause discourse? I apologize if this made you uncomfortable. Its main purpose was to show what you are talking about to those who come up with so much crap a little of thier own medicine. You can think what you want about me and people are not going to like some things i have to say. It does not matter if it is on a thread like this or serious discussion about the scriptures because if you want to do your homework believers alot of them at least hate what i have to say because I back it up with reference books that go to the Greek and Hebrew. If you are Holier than thou then i am glad u are proud of your self. But i doubt very few has seen about the scriptures that can not be refuted because i will use thier own books to prove to them thats not what it says. I hope you understand just going along will get u know where but taking a stand is what Yahshua did and I will also. You want to discuss anything in the scriptures with reason i will be more than happy to and as gentle as a dove...Blessings of Shalom...Miles |
|
|