THE WORLD CATACLYSM IN 2012 is the title of a book written by Belgian author Patrick Geryl


Interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd-cCeaKrOA&feature=player_embedded



THE WORLD CATACLYSM IN 2012 is the title of a book written by Belgian author Patrick Geryl in 2005 - and the title tells it just like he sees it. Patrick's opinion is so cut-and-dried - and quite d...
THE WORLD CATACLYSM IN 2012 is the title of a book written by Belgian author Patrick Geryl in 2005 - and the title tells it just like he sees it. Patrick's opinion is so cut-and-dried - and quite devoid of hope! - that he was interviewed (not by us) in conjunction with the very alarming SONY PICTURES disaster movie, 2012.

This is the first video we've published which includes our disclaimer that while the interview presents interesting information, and that we have nothing against Patrick personally, we firmly believe that his conclusions are incorrect.

We actually debated whether to release it at all - though the video shows a civilized and intelligent conversation, and Patrick Geryl is a well-meaning and intellectually honest researcher. For someone certain that the world as we know it will end, Patrick is astonishingly cheerful, friendly and matter-of-fact.

We opted to release the video, with the disclaimer, so that his logic could be made accessible to others. In brief, Patrick is convinced that the sun will undergo a pole reversal in 2012, and that this will induce a similar reversal on Earth. At that point, says Patrick, all hell will break loose.

The idea of a cataclysm in 2012 is not just Patrick's. Roland Emmerich (the director of the movie 2012) did not get his ideas from him. The notion of a pole shift (or some other civilization-stopper) round about then has become a kind of modern myth.

What makes this interesting territory to explore is that, as many visitors to PROJECT CAMELOT will know, governments of the US and other countries have spent trillions of dollars building hundreds (if not thousands) of deep underground bases, some the size of small cities with a subterranean transport system connecting them, and most black project researchers now support the idea of a secret space program that might be far more advanced than would be easily believable.

The question is WHY. Is this preparation for a cataclysmic event that had been foreseen using classified technology - or one about which we were warned by friendly time-traveling ETs? Or is the reality more subtle: that there was reason to take precautions against a possible event of this nature, but that while the military were doing what they do best - digging in defensively - the best minds on and off the planet were working to eliminate the threat?

Based on insider testimony from our own multiple sources, PROJECT CAMELOT firmly believes the latter. For more on this, read our major article 2009: A TALE OF TWO TIMELINES [ http://projectcamelot.org/2009.html ] which cites strong evidence that the future is changeable (and NOT fixed) - and that the way things turn out for us all is influenced not only by high technology, but also by the power of consciousness itself.

This is, in our view, the flaw in Patrick Geryl's analysis. He omits to consider the power of consciousness to shape events (which is why the 2012 movie is dangerous: it might scare millions of people into manifesting the very thing that is least wanted).

We believe that the many hundreds of thousands of Indigo and Crystal Children, preceded by more mature warriors like ourselves (and there are MANY of us: we are only two people among a very large worldwide team that spans every culture), would NOT be here if the future was all wrapped up. Speaking personally, we would have incarnated on another planet. Why land on Planet Earth just to jump off the cliff edge? It makes no sense to us unless there was a game to be played.

Here, the use of the word 'game' does not imply anything trivial. Seen from an Earthly level, it couldn't be more serious - although a spiritually light touch adds substantially to the power one has at one's disposal to catalyze change. The notion of a 'game' is that the outcome is uncertain - and that the desired outcome is worth striving for, against opposition in the form of the counter-intentions of others, and other practical challenges.

This is what we're certain is going on: the stakes are high, the outcome is not fixed, and there are players in this game - seen and unseen, on either side - which have significant power and ability.

This is the shortest written summary we can offer of what is a huge subject. It's not everything that Project Camelot is about, but is quite a large part: and those of you who have accompanied us on this journey will be aware of much of what has been written above. We ask you to support the process, each in your own way, of ensuring that the outcome for the human race is a desirable one, and that the planet will be one which our children will enjoy - and where we ourselves will be pleased to return in our next lifetime, should we choose.
Category: Science & Technology

This interview is long, but interesting none the less.

This interview is long, but interesting none the less.

I don't know... if the amount of talk about 2012 increases steadily over the time to come, I'm liable to snap, lose my mind, and run amok and stab every New Age person I come in contact with.

This is really irritating, you know.

I HAVE A GREAT IDEA.

Take all your credit cards and charge them to the limit, and then after 2012 plead temporary insanity and tell them you charged all that because you didn't think anyone would care after the destruction of the world.

If that doesn't work sue every person who made the claim that it was the end of the world. LOL

I already made a similar suggestion. I put all my money against all the money of those who say it will end in 2012. If the world does not end, I keep all the money thus put up; if they world ends, they get to keep the money.

So far -- no takers.

I don't know why people keep tearing their stupid mouths off but if they are asked to put their money where their mouths are, they shy away from the bet.

I think if someone does not enter into a bet that could potentially prove their point, they must forever cease and desist from tearing their stupid mouths off.

I have another idea. Those who advocate or even entertain the idea that the world will end or cataclimatize in 2012, and the world does NOT, then those same people must grab a plyer and tear their own stupid tongues out at the root of their mouths.

I'm not pissed off, I'm just sick and tired of this "what if" talk as if everyone just came to a great insight that they must inform others of. The NASA issued a public plea that rest assured, the world will not come to an end. It's on my Yahoo Home page. What else do these idiots need to hear in order to shut up about 2012?

Hey, wux!

I heard the world might end in 2012.

Yeah, I keep hearing that, too, way too effing much often. F.

I'm still not understanding where the "end of the world" theory has come from...the Mayan never spoke of this. It sounds more radical Christian..Jesus coming to me.

I think its mostly the people who thought the world would end in 2000. And 2001.

That, if memory serves was talk of computers not turning over the numbers, bank accounts getting messed up, as much as i remember anyway, never thought much about it. This 2012 thing is massive death and destruction mentality...
I'm just not understanding where this talk originated from...
It is beyond the Mayan calender ..

I thought Mayan beliefs were more circular in nature. Something cataclysmic may happen, but circles don't end.
Just my thoughts...

With Ladylid2012 being my name...I do believe somethings are happening, going to happen. Just not the end of the world, maybe some needed changes..

My understanding was that their calendar ended on that day.

Not really implying anything.

They got tired of writing and stopped on that day...lol

* * * That's just a greatest advertisement plot -- in advance of the movie, "2012" -- HURRY, BE ONE OF THE FIRST ONES TO BE "WARNED"!!!