OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY


1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.

2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people

3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.

4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.

5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.

7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.

8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control."

9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.

10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.

Click here to read full length version.


http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2009/03/03/declaration-of-orders-we-will-not-obey/

We know who is really looking out for us!

This thread is barely two weeks cold, and you go and bring it back up as if it is a brand new thread never been discussed. Takl about subversive and manipulative.


For those of you who are interested, this thread started originally on the 11th of October, 2009 (at least as far as I am aware). The comments and posts in it did not go the way that willing would have liked them to (which is to say, people were smart enough to figure out that a lot of what was being said was false and misleading at best), so it appears the op has decided to wait a couple weeks for pepole to forget about it, andthen repost it anew.

The link to the original thread is as follows:

http://mingle2.com/topic/show/250557

cold but not manipulative

And here I thought it was an original idea.

Perhaps, you can provide me a list of topics so, I don't mistakenly post an old topic.

For those who give a rat's-a$$, my comp. was in the shop and I have no idea what has happened in the last couple weeks.
You presume assumptive and manipulative.

It is very rude to assume and condem without prior investigation. I won't expect an apology. I've accepted, Liberals don't accept responsability for their blatantcies.

You, as Obummer, fail.

i'm neither an obama fan nor a liberal but this post is one of the most immature attempts i've seen to make a case for any thread by an op. i'd say the less said the better but you didn't have anything to say in the op anyway. you merely posted what we all can read on our own. we have search engines too you see. now, do you have something cognative to add TO YOUR OWN THREAD or will you continue to show off your copy/paste prowess?

I search for relevant topics. I've always had a knack for cutting and gluing.

Have you nothing to add to the topic or do you just enjoy attempting to appear superior with you comdemnations?

I agree and support this group. Otherwise, I wouldn't have posted their material.

how is obama more relevant to the topic than bush was? this group was around long before obama. so why bring their commander in chief into your discussion? is it the group you support, as i do btw, or just an anti obama/liberal bash that you seek an audience for? would you not support the group for disobeying these orders if given by their former cic?

I would imagine Obummer is relavant because he is the one holding the pen now.

BTW, I shook my head in total disbelief when Bush Jr got elected the first time and after the first screwin' was floored he was reelected. I thought everyone knew he was a drunk. Either the vote was fixed or the ones who revoted for him enjoy takin' it up the tailpipe.

I am a big fan of Ron Paul. He's the one the Extremist Right-Wing Media wouldn't give airtime to. He's about the only Politician who isn't stuffing his bankroll.

This is a hoax.No one in the military will take this oath.They already do all these things in other countries.Its their JOB.A person is living in a dream land if they think this is real