Clearly your opinion.

Whew, thank goodness for that. Just stick with your Communist Network News and your liberal websites and you'll be ok. I'll stick with mine and know that not only on Fox, but other means of research I have the choice to choose the one that I feel finally gives some of us Americans another point of view other than what the liberal media has been shoving down our throats for so many years.

So, both of you use various sites to research things so you're not only relying on news shows for info, right? Why are yours fine and hers aren't? Do you know where she's looking for info? While you don't actually say hers aren't fine, it's the way you talk down to those you think are liberals that shows you think what they're doing is completely wrong.

I used to be a news junkie. My dish would move to pick up multiple satellites and multiple obscure feeds. My contacts at work gave me direct information about certain events around the world. My contacts in government gave me additional sources. My travels around the world allowed me to see many situations firsthand... or contact people who had.

At the time CNN was really the only game in town. I gave them the benefit of the doubt but noticed that, not only was their reporting slanted, it was always slanted the same way, left. Some of the reporting was either grossly misreported, or just wrong.

Fox News came along and I started watching it in addition to CNN. Fox was more accurate in reporting and while the commentary had a generally favorable slant to the right, they would offer opposing views to almost everything. The majority of the viewers could tell the same thing I could tell. The product Fox was offering was of a higher quality. Fox has more viewers because they do a better job. CNN lost market share because they presented their product as unbiased when anyone could tell that it was, and offered no opposing view.

If you really want to know how bad certain reporting is, you should see what doesn't get reported. CNN "cherry picks" to give a consistent slanted view of the world. A good recent example was the aircraft crash over the Hudson River. CNN falsely reported the air regulations in effect (I know them by heart) then reported NEW regulations regarding pilots speaking to each other by radio and notifying each other of their positions (there is nothing new about this). Virtually every aspect of the crash was reported incorrectly and all the "changes" they claimed were needed were already in effect. This is typical of how they hype news and make up conflicts to make the story sound better.

She disapproves of mine and I disapprove of hers, nothing new my dear.

Ah, so because she didn't like Fox, you don't approve of anything she may watch/read. I get it.

I find it funny that fox is on the chopping block.

All you hear is Orielly, Hannity, and Beck are the ones people complain about.

What about

John Scott

Bret Biaer

Greta Vansustren (Wiconsinite )

Neil Cavuto

Shepard Smith


They are on fox and I don't see them "spinning" things like is being accused.

Would I do something like that?