2 Next
Topic: If insanity is defined as...
creativesoul's photo
Sun 05/20/07 09:56 AM
Awww...Y'all beat me to it...Cheers...lol

jeanc200358's photo
Sun 05/20/07 09:57 AM
Like I said, it would be impossible to shoot the basket in EXACTLY the
same way.

Same holds true for anything you attempt to do. It may appear to be
doing it in the same way, but there are always at least slight
variations.

jeanc200358's photo
Sun 05/20/07 09:59 AM
again, though...regardless of that, that is still not the "clinical"
definition of "insanity"...it isn't how psychiatrists make the
determination of whether or not a person is "insane."

Wharf_rat's photo
Sun 05/20/07 10:00 AM
missing my point... it's not exactly the same way because, after a
failed attempt, adjustments are made based on that information. these
are thought out adjustments. if no adjustment was made, because it is
being insisted that it must work, then it's insane!

Native_Grl39's photo
Sun 05/20/07 10:02 AM
I'm not insane...My reality is just different then everybody
elses!!!!!!!!!





laugh noway noway bigsmile

jeanc200358's photo
Sun 05/20/07 10:06 AM
missing my point...

No, I'm not; I'm disputing it.

It's not exactly the same way because, after a failed attempt,
adjustments are made based on that information.

It's not exactly the same, because that would be an impossibilty.

These are thought out adjustments. if no adjustment was made, because it
is being insisted that it must work, then it's insane!

It may be "illogical," but it's definitely not "insane."

And, actually, the term is a legal one, not a medical one. The legal
profession considers insanity to be the determination of whether or not
a person is mentally capable of being held responsible for their
actions.

The psychiatric profession determines "insanity" based on a number of
different criteria, such as various levels of psychoses, etc.

Wharf_rat's photo
Sun 05/20/07 01:45 PM
and your point is?

2 Next