Topic: Liberals VS. Bleeding Hearts
AndyBgood's photo
Tue 06/16/09 10:29 AM
Well, a lot of us have seen it and participated in bashing liberals but in reality it is time to face up to the deeper reality of our criticism.
I have found that Liberals are eating a lot of blame for Bleeding Hearts unfairly. Liberals believe in more socially oriented government. There is nothing wrong per say with that. Government has a duty to promote life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. it also has a duty to provide for common defense and promote social welfare BUT this has been blown completely out of context these days.

Enter the Bleeding Hearts. These people make me utterly sick. These pathetic excuses want us all to follow their belief systems which is "we have so much we need to share with the rest of the world." its all hugs and rainbows for them but they seem to forget that not everyone in America has the privileges and family money a few of us have. I for one have very little and struggle day to day to make a living and at times I have to go hungry to pay my bills. I do not feel fortunate at all while the Bleeding Hearts (who usually come from well to do families and have financial resources I sure in the hell don't) act like all of us have so much we need to share. Fact is that if you have lived in poverty your heart does not bleed for anyone.

Bleeding Hearts could care less where the money for their give always comes from because they are under some delusion that we need no account or should receive reciprocation (in the sense of getting something in return) for our acts of charity. They try to compel our government to support people who do not deserve our support. They think money will solve everything. Unfortunately money aggravates the problems of the world far more.

Example, Africa: of all the aid we sent in food and money how much of it actually makes it to the people in need? In many studies the numbers were shockingly low. In many instances the aid never made it and the food sold in local markets instead of distributed like it was supposed to be by local governments.

Many charitable organizations bleed off a huge percentage to their "Operational" costs (cough cough, paychecks...). Many local governments in countries receiving this aid pocket it instead of distribute.

Mexico: Things are bad there. I mean it is really bad. Many people demand we help but the fact is unless we invade them and take over there is nothing we can or should do. It is an internal problem Mexico needs to solve for itself. We cannot fight their war on drugs for them unless they were under our flag, not theirs. Sovereignty issues folks!

It pisses me off that there are so many in need within our own country and these "Feed the starving children of Africa," jack offs forget about the starving children of America. How can we face the problems of the world when we cannot even solve our own problems? Want to solve the Starving Children issue in Africa? BIRTH CONTROL, NOT FOOD! Nuff said... They need to be thinned down a little anyways.


At least Liberals in a pure sense are the heart and conscious where the Conservatives are about accountability and morality. Together the two create balance, too much of either and you get what we have now. We cannot have one without the other but the two sides are always so right and then enter the Bleeding Heart. They come in both flavors. A lot of misconceptions of how liberals and conservative play in our government is smoke screened by Bleeding Hearts who have infiltrated the system and vote in huge aid packages to unfriendly nations. They give so much to everyone and they have no idea, clue, or care where the money comes from. Even poor Americans to them are privileged and while we go hungry they (our leadership) dines on lobster flown in from Maine. They complain about how much we have as Americans driving along in a 100K + Mercedes Benz while the rest of us are stuck with Ford, GM, and cheap Asian imports. Most of us eat rent each month, they own four or five homes at least.

Like I said, your heart does not bleed when you have lived in poverty. We need to take a serious look at how America spends money and stop it with the Foreign Aid! This whole "Starving Children of the world" think is utter crap! We can not solve anyone else's problems until we solve our own. When we have done away with Poverty in our own nation then we can focus our attentions on the rest of the world.

Ultimately Liberals need to understand that the money they spend on social programs has to come from somewhere. The bleeding hearts need to get a grip and not spend so much energy trying to compel us to give to everyone who does not deserve it.

For example the homeless issue...
Some people are victims of circumstance and other factors. These are people truly in need of a helping hand and government should be there to give them the tools to get back on their feet. Some people really do not try to milk the system. In the communist ideal they are Workers. They are the backbone of American prosperity. BUT now we talk about the Parasite, the people in the communist ideal that are not contributors and just bleed everyone else for their comfort. Living in Los Angeles I see a lot of Homeless and supposed Homeless. The real homeless are easy to tell apart from the fakers. It is how dirty they are and how they dress. Many Tweakers and Skeivvers (Meth addicts and Smack addicts) usually dress in clean cloths or something about the way they dress does not exactly smack of real homlessness. They look pathetic but in reality they are just as dangerous as rabid dogs. Given the chance to rip you off they will. They always have signs that say Homeless and Hungry and will work for food. Offer them work and they will turn it down. Offer them food and they look at you like you pissed them off. Typically a real desperate person will be thankful for any act of charity. The problem is all of them know where the shelters are and all of the shelters have a no drugs policy and the ones camping out in dirt lots and freeway underpasses are more than likely (19 out of 20 times) on the Shi*.
Another dead give away to Tweakers and Crack addicts (who I like to call Cracklins) is their teeth. DEAD giveaway! I know of one homeless man who is a long time Street Bum. He hangs out on Hawthorne Blvd and 166th in Lawndale near the old Circle K. He is there just about every single day pacing in the same place or sleeping in the bushes. He is there because he wants to be. He looks like he has not seen a bath tub in about ten years. he is not a drug addict but he is very troubled. The man became disillusioned with life and snapped. From what I heard about him he was an engineer. He has been offered help and he does not want any. He never bothers anyone. Oddly I would compare his appearance to that of an Aborigine in a lot of ways but he is white.
The fact is...
You cannot help someone who does not want it and some of these people have a constitutional right to live the way they want to. There was one woman I seen in Redondo who had a smell I could detect from twenty feet away and she was having a conversation with her reflection in a window. Between addictions and dementia and the constitution when is the government supposed to step in? CAN IT EVEN DO SO WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL???? NO unfortunately. The individual HAS to want to be helped.
Welfare was a prime example of the failure of money to solve the problem. For women to get money for having babies spawned a whole new set of problems like a baby boom of unwed mothers to get at that government check. It also led to a boon for the illegal drug trade and alcoholism. The Katrina Hurricane is also another example of the failure of giving money away. Many people receiving government subsidized housing actually never tried to relocate and had to be evicted recently from government housing. Of the FEMA money given most of it was squandered on boob jobs, Hummers, BMWs, and vacations. The fact is human nature works against the greatest of ideas. Why do you think communism failed? Human nature... Great idea but the fact is it was doomed to fail from the beginning.

So now I have a clearer sense of who I revile in the political scene more. I am not mad at the Democrats or Republicans so much as I am pissed off at the Bleeding Hearts more! Overall Congress made this mess. The whole "suffering masses" thinking in our government is not helping anyone out. Congress needs to learn that money is not the only answer to everything! So do the damn Bleeding Hearts!




Can I breath now???huh


And that has been MY rant of the day!!!


Cheers!drinker


:banana:

no photo
Tue 06/16/09 11:13 AM

Well, a lot of us have seen it and participated in bashing liberals but in reality it is time to face up to the deeper reality of our criticism.
I have found that Liberals are eating a lot of blame for Bleeding Hearts unfairly. Liberals believe in more socially oriented government. There is nothing wrong per say with that. Government has a duty to promote life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. it also has a duty to provide for common defense and promote social welfare BUT this has been blown completely out of context these days.

Enter the Bleeding Hearts. These people make me utterly sick. These pathetic excuses want us all to follow their belief systems which is "we have so much we need to share with the rest of the world." its all hugs and rainbows for them but they seem to forget that not everyone in America has the privileges and family money a few of us have. I for one have very little and struggle day to day to make a living and at times I have to go hungry to pay my bills. I do not feel fortunate at all while the Bleeding Hearts (who usually come from well to do families and have financial resources I sure in the hell don't) act like all of us have so much we need to share. Fact is that if you have lived in poverty your heart does not bleed for anyone.

Bleeding Hearts could care less where the money for their give always comes from because they are under some delusion that we need no account or should receive reciprocation (in the sense of getting something in return) for our acts of charity. They try to compel our government to support people who do not deserve our support. They think money will solve everything. Unfortunately money aggravates the problems of the world far more.

Example, Africa: of all the aid we sent in food and money how much of it actually makes it to the people in need? In many studies the numbers were shockingly low. In many instances the aid never made it and the food sold in local markets instead of distributed like it was supposed to be by local governments.

Many charitable organizations bleed off a huge percentage to their "Operational" costs (cough cough, paychecks...). Many local governments in countries receiving this aid pocket it instead of distribute.

Mexico: Things are bad there. I mean it is really bad. Many people demand we help but the fact is unless we invade them and take over there is nothing we can or should do. It is an internal problem Mexico needs to solve for itself. We cannot fight their war on drugs for them unless they were under our flag, not theirs. Sovereignty issues folks!

It pisses me off that there are so many in need within our own country and these "Feed the starving children of Africa," jack offs forget about the starving children of America. How can we face the problems of the world when we cannot even solve our own problems? Want to solve the Starving Children issue in Africa? BIRTH CONTROL, NOT FOOD! Nuff said... They need to be thinned down a little anyways.


At least Liberals in a pure sense are the heart and conscious where the Conservatives are about accountability and morality. Together the two create balance, too much of either and you get what we have now. We cannot have one without the other but the two sides are always so right and then enter the Bleeding Heart. They come in both flavors. A lot of misconceptions of how liberals and conservative play in our government is smoke screened by Bleeding Hearts who have infiltrated the system and vote in huge aid packages to unfriendly nations. They give so much to everyone and they have no idea, clue, or care where the money comes from. Even poor Americans to them are privileged and while we go hungry they (our leadership) dines on lobster flown in from Maine. They complain about how much we have as Americans driving along in a 100K + Mercedes Benz while the rest of us are stuck with Ford, GM, and cheap Asian imports. Most of us eat rent each month, they own four or five homes at least.

Like I said, your heart does not bleed when you have lived in poverty. We need to take a serious look at how America spends money and stop it with the Foreign Aid! This whole "Starving Children of the world" think is utter crap! We can not solve anyone else's problems until we solve our own. When we have done away with Poverty in our own nation then we can focus our attentions on the rest of the world.

Ultimately Liberals need to understand that the money they spend on social programs has to come from somewhere. The bleeding hearts need to get a grip and not spend so much energy trying to compel us to give to everyone who does not deserve it.

For example the homeless issue...
Some people are victims of circumstance and other factors. These are people truly in need of a helping hand and government should be there to give them the tools to get back on their feet. Some people really do not try to milk the system. In the communist ideal they are Workers. They are the backbone of American prosperity. BUT now we talk about the Parasite, the people in the communist ideal that are not contributors and just bleed everyone else for their comfort. Living in Los Angeles I see a lot of Homeless and supposed Homeless. The real homeless are easy to tell apart from the fakers. It is how dirty they are and how they dress. Many Tweakers and Skeivvers (Meth addicts and Smack addicts) usually dress in clean cloths or something about the way they dress does not exactly smack of real homlessness. They look pathetic but in reality they are just as dangerous as rabid dogs. Given the chance to rip you off they will. They always have signs that say Homeless and Hungry and will work for food. Offer them work and they will turn it down. Offer them food and they look at you like you pissed them off. Typically a real desperate person will be thankful for any act of charity. The problem is all of them know where the shelters are and all of the shelters have a no drugs policy and the ones camping out in dirt lots and freeway underpasses are more than likely (19 out of 20 times) on the Shi*.
Another dead give away to Tweakers and Crack addicts (who I like to call Cracklins) is their teeth. DEAD giveaway! I know of one homeless man who is a long time Street Bum. He hangs out on Hawthorne Blvd and 166th in Lawndale near the old Circle K. He is there just about every single day pacing in the same place or sleeping in the bushes. He is there because he wants to be. He looks like he has not seen a bath tub in about ten years. he is not a drug addict but he is very troubled. The man became disillusioned with life and snapped. From what I heard about him he was an engineer. He has been offered help and he does not want any. He never bothers anyone. Oddly I would compare his appearance to that of an Aborigine in a lot of ways but he is white.
The fact is...
You cannot help someone who does not want it and some of these people have a constitutional right to live the way they want to. There was one woman I seen in Redondo who had a smell I could detect from twenty feet away and she was having a conversation with her reflection in a window. Between addictions and dementia and the constitution when is the government supposed to step in? CAN IT EVEN DO SO WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL???? NO unfortunately. The individual HAS to want to be helped.
Welfare was a prime example of the failure of money to solve the problem. For women to get money for having babies spawned a whole new set of problems like a baby boom of unwed mothers to get at that government check. It also led to a boon for the illegal drug trade and alcoholism. The Katrina Hurricane is also another example of the failure of giving money away. Many people receiving government subsidized housing actually never tried to relocate and had to be evicted recently from government housing. Of the FEMA money given most of it was squandered on boob jobs, Hummers, BMWs, and vacations. The fact is human nature works against the greatest of ideas. Why do you think communism failed? Human nature... Great idea but the fact is it was doomed to fail from the beginning.

So now I have a clearer sense of who I revile in the political scene more. I am not mad at the Democrats or Republicans so much as I am pissed off at the Bleeding Hearts more! Overall Congress made this mess. The whole "suffering masses" thinking in our government is not helping anyone out. Congress needs to learn that money is not the only answer to everything! So do the damn Bleeding Hearts!




Can I breath now???huh


And that has been MY rant of the day!!!


Cheers!drinker


:banana:


think Someone gets it!

Dragoness's photo
Tue 06/16/09 11:47 AM
Bleeding hearts have their place in this world. They do good too.

I think with everything moderation is the key. We need a bit of liberal and bit of conservative to balance the ranks. It makes for conflicts but sometimes through conflict comes the greatest acheivements.

Our country since Bush came into office and was the "great divider" has been at each others throats but in time this too will subside and we will be able to work together for the greater causes.

We do not need to be all liberal and we do not need to be all conservative for this country to work but we do need to live together.