we are nothing but lab rats.

some of us mroe vulnerable than others

just asking because i'm lost....but weren't the people in the studies volunteers?

in most cases of what they were volunterring for, or of their accurate diagnosis, (the alabama syphillis cases)....

they didnt have a clue what was going on around them. they werent given the knowledge to make any imformed consent.






hey rose.....wanna go to vegas???
yes or no??

oh cat....if i had the money....i would be the first one there with ya.

ok...ty for answering that. that makes more sense

Medical experiments could be carried out in the United States on uninformed patients under a rule change proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, charges a California pro-family group..

The plan is in a rule proposed by the FDA regarding "emergency research" that scientists and doctors could conduct on unconscious or otherwise incapacitated patients, said Richard Ackerman of the Pro-Life Law Center.

The proposed rules, known as "Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors: Exception from Informed Consent for Emergency Research," are scheduled for a public hearing next month.

The proposal would allow the use of any "investigational new drug application" or "investigational device" on people who have a life-threatening medical condition for which other treatments are unsatisfactory. It applies in situations where the patients are unconscious and cannot give consent and none of their representatives is available.

"Such 'emergency research' could be conducted without any informed consent from the patient or their designated representative," Ackerman noted.

"Informed consent is a touchstone in regards to human freedom in medical issues," he said. Pro-Family Law Center, told WorldNetDaily yesterday. "It's been held in common law for hundreds of years.

"The minute you allow a doctor to cross that line, between the patient or patient's representive being in the know, you've given over complete control to the doctor," he said.

He described the experiments as being "Nazi-like" and said he used that term intentionally.

"This is reminiscent of the days of Hitler and Dr. Mengele," he said. "The idea that research can be performed on a human being without informed consent is antithetical to the very meaning of human self-determination and dignity."

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51880

yes...well I could be anyone rose. I could have horrible horrible mind boggling intentions.

on what my plans for vegas truly are.







BUT vegas does sound like fun, lol
(and im jsut using it is an example)