Topic: The Menacing Missiles of Taiwan | |
---|---|
The Other Problems with this war on Terrorism has drawn our attention
away from other countries manufacturing weapons. Now, Chinese or more politically correct Taiwan has been modifying weapons. This info has been heard of but, never thought that it had any relevance. Regardless, if it does or not my opinion is that it can pose a possible threat if they decide to sell the weapons to another country including any muslim or even the Taliban. Our Government has known for a long time has known that Taiwan has been relatively quiet about its long range missile programs. But recently, senior officials mentioned that Taiwan does have missiles that can reach targets deep inside China. Also mentioned was a recent wargame, where Taiwanese used these missiles to defeat a Chinese attempt to invade Taiwan. Apparently, someone is sending a message. About, two years ago Taiwan tested a cruise missile version of its Hsiung Feng anti-ship missile. This baby has a range of over 500 kilometers, and a highly accurate guidance system, the missile could do a lot of damage to the many Chinese military targets near the coast. Taiwan had held off on mass production of the missile, so as not to alarm China, and to avoid the enormous expense of building up a Hsiung Feng stockpile. The missiles cost over $300,000 each. There are already over 700 Chinese ballistic missiles across 160 kilometers wide the Taiwan Straits. The Hsiung Feng is capable of hitting land targets along the Chinese coast, and deep inland, including a GPS guidance system. Last year, Taiwan revealed that it had developed yet another version of its Hsiung Feng II anti-ship missile. This one is launched from trucks or fixed launchers, has a range of at least 600 kilometers and is intended to go after targets on the Chinese mainland. Only if China attempts to invade Taiwan, of course. Three prototypes have been built, and production has apparently already begun. Current plans are for 500 of these one ton Hsiung Feng IIE cruise missiles to be put in service. They apparently use GPS guidance and some stealth features, to make them less liable to getting shot down. Using a more efficient engine, range could be extended to 1,000 kilometers or more. The Hsiung Feng IIE is pretty cheap, about $300,000 each, and carries a 500 pound warhead. The Hsiung Feng IIE project has been kept quiet, with few details released officially. Apparently this was done so as to not alarm the Chinese, at least in public. Taiwan also built their own version of the American AGM-154A JSOW (Joint Stand Off Weapon). The Taiwanese version is called the Wan Chien. JSOW is basically a smart bomb with wings. That enables it to glide up to 70 kilometers from the aircraft dropping it, to a target on the ground. Range is about 25 kilometers if dropped from low altitude. JSOW also contains more elaborate fins and software that enables it to follow a specific route. Like the wingless JDAM smart bomb, JSOW uses GPS and inertial guidance (as a backup) to find its target. Like JDAM, JSOW hits within 30 feet of its aiming point. The U.S. pays about $250,000 for each JSOW. The Taiwanese could use their Wan Chien. JSOW as a form of HARM to take out the latest Chinese air defense radars. Taiwan is also building its own version of HARM, called Tien Chien 2A. JDAM technology is a lot simpler than these two other projects, and Taiwan could easily design and build its own. Refusing to sell them just costs the U.S. export sales. On the other hand, it allows the United States to tell China that it didn't sell JDAM to Taiwan, thus "defusing" tensions over Taiwan. In reality, of course, Taiwan can just go build their own JDAM, which they will probably do. The main question i think is Beside defending their country from invasion from the Chinese will Taiwan use this to an advantage and support the U.S.A or will they sell it to the highest bidders |
|
|
|
I rather think that if you were able to come by all this information, it
is hardley a secret to our government. How may terrorist attacks have stemmed from Taiwan. How much of a threat have they posed, how much destruction power, given thier economic status, could they threaten with? I don't know much about world politics, I dont' know who is or could or would have a reason to be allied with Taiwan , but I so believe that our govenment knows these things and it is not necessary for that information to be shared with the general public if there is something being watched. It may be better for our govnt if it's not known they are watching. Alarmist thinking coult lead to wrong actions. |
|
|
|
you know maybe you can clarify=
the US has hinted to tawian that if china does try to attack them , reinstating them into china that we would provide them support. computer models of such an attack has been played out at the .... well utsnokoro you know where, and all models say that china would eventually pull back out with both sides suffering heavy losses, the US was never plugged into any of the models ran... so the clarification,,, we're helping them out right, so why are they a threat again? doc |
|
|
|
Hey, Doc what would happen if a country that we helped out got pissed by
our government. Would it be like we were fighting ourselves. |
|
|
|
well shadow, that is the question isnt it, wouldnt be the first time tho
would it. not that it matters , i know he answer to the question, awain is about as american as canada, i wouldnt be worried about them hurting us just like i wouldnr be worried about australia or britian. doc |
|
|
|
Doesnt seem like a problem to me that we stand by Taiwan. Why would it
be a problem? If China uses force to force Taiwan to step into line, then they have every right to retaliate. If they use missiles that have been modified with our "tacit approval" - so what. After all, its China thats said "millitary force" is an open option if Taiwan doesnt change its independence plans. Not the other way around. |
|
|
|
Wars and rumors.
Jeez... Next youll be posting about some war in (insert a place in the world here). |
|
|
|
you are correct AB- sometimes it takes someone who is detatched to bring
reason back to the insainity. appreciate it, thanks. doc |
|
|