100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Don"t Rate! | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Wed 01/28/09 02:18 PM
|
|
*sigh* I was referring to the Wolf-pack Mentality thread...in direct response to your statement: "I didn't see any "wolf-pack" going on here". I hope you're not being intentionally obtuse..
___________________________________________________ I don't remember a wolf-pack thread. I didn't feel that I needed to say anything about my statement. I don't see any wolf-packing on this thread. Why would you hope that I'm not being intentionally obtuse? Also, this is getting very "off-topic". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*sigh* I was referring to the Wolf-pack Mentality thread...in direct response to your statement: "I didn't see any "wolf-pack" going on here". I hope you're not being intentionally obtuse.. ___________________________________________________ I don't remember a wolf-pack thread. I didn't feel that I needed to say anything about my statement. I don't see any wolf-packing on this thread. Why would you hope that I'm not being intentionally obtuse? Also, this is getting very "off-topic". OK...I went back to page three of General Disc. & found the thread. I did indeed misquote you (well, I actually said "you may have said")...it was someone else that said they were unaware of the wolf-pack...& I do apologise for that. But you are in that thread giving reasons for why a person might be accused of being a fake for not having a pic. I also asked you if all should pay for a few fakes...a rational that I find very "pack-like". So...that clears up THAT. As far as being on topic or not...in this thread, Prisoner is being "rated" for his tag "be seeing you"...of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion...but again, I do see this as an attack on his originality, especially when asked (whether or not the word "please" was used) to change his posting style....& again, representing pack-like behaviour...*shrug* I've said my peace... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Phuque...will you marry me? be seeing you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
don't rate my profile! but if you did...what would you say? be seeing you Since you aren't asking for a rating I guess I won't tell you that No cap's or good sentence structure makes it a wee bit hard to read. There isn't really anything that stands out except for the old T.V. show. I won't tell you, your cliche of "be seeing you" isn't original nor does it particularly bother me either way. I do think that a picture of some sort even an avatar would be great. That is your choice since pic's don't have any relevence on whether I like someone or not. I have found most of them are so photoshopped that who knows, till you get to webcam you can't be sure who is real and who isn't. As for the off topic comment on the "pack" mentality I haven't a clue why that would be brought up in here since this is profile reviews.. JMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Catch Phrases" are very difficult to come up with as is the timing to use them. If they are over used they lose their impact. When they are used in a creative fashion they have greater impact.
Personally would not use a "catch phrase" on forum post. Would reserve them for e-mails. JMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Catch Phrases" are very difficult to come up with as is the timing to use them. If they are over used they lose their impact. When they are used in a creative fashion they have greater impact. Personally would not use a "catch phrase" on forum post. Would reserve them for e-mails. JMO. Yes, exactly. It might be cute once or twice. But every time? It gets old quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is for (singmesweet) because I was next in line..
I enjoyed your profile. More then one picture and lot's of narration. At the end of the page I could start to paint a picture as to who you are.. Two thumbs up! *Grin* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is for (singmesweet) because I was next in line.. I enjoyed your profile. More then one picture and lot's of narration. At the end of the page I could start to paint a picture as to who you are.. Two thumbs up! *Grin* Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*sigh* I was referring to the Wolf-pack Mentality thread...in direct response to your statement: "I didn't see any "wolf-pack" going on here". I hope you're not being intentionally obtuse.. ___________________________________________________ I don't remember a wolf-pack thread. I didn't feel that I needed to say anything about my statement. I don't see any wolf-packing on this thread. Why would you hope that I'm not being intentionally obtuse? Also, this is getting very "off-topic". OK...I went back to page three of General Disc. & found the thread. I did indeed misquote you (well, I actually said "you may have said")...it was someone else that said they were unaware of the wolf-pack...& I do apologise for that. But you are in that thread giving reasons for why a person might be accused of being a fake for not having a pic. I also asked you if all should pay for a few fakes...a rational that I find very "pack-like". So...that clears up THAT. As far as being on topic or not...in this thread, Prisoner is being "rated" for his tag "be seeing you"...of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion...but again, I do see this as an attack on his originality, especially when asked (whether or not the word "please" was used) to change his posting style....& again, representing pack-like behaviour...*shrug* I've said my peace...    Phuque... I do not understand how you can "be seeing you" as original when he just copying a tv show, if it was truly original he would have come up with it on his own, instead of cult following the prisoner tv show much like Trekkies do Star Trek, JMO. Not really a leader of the pack IMO, just a follower actually. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Phuque2
on
Thu 01/29/09 09:43 AM
|
|
*sigh* I was referring to the Wolf-pack Mentality thread...in direct response to your statement: "I didn't see any "wolf-pack" going on here". I hope you're not being intentionally obtuse.. ___________________________________________________ I don't remember a wolf-pack thread. I didn't feel that I needed to say anything about my statement. I don't see any wolf-packing on this thread. Why would you hope that I'm not being intentionally obtuse? Also, this is getting very "off-topic". OK...I went back to page three of General Disc. & found the thread. I did indeed misquote you (well, I actually said "you may have said")...it was someone else that said they were unaware of the wolf-pack...& I do apologise for that. But you are in that thread giving reasons for why a person might be accused of being a fake for not having a pic. I also asked you if all should pay for a few fakes...a rational that I find very "pack-like". So...that clears up THAT. As far as being on topic or not...in this thread, Prisoner is being "rated" for his tag "be seeing you"...of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion...but again, I do see this as an attack on his originality, especially when asked (whether or not the word "please" was used) to change his posting style....& again, representing pack-like behaviour...*shrug* I've said my peace... Phuque... I do not understand how you can "be seeing you" as original when he just copying a tv show, if it was truly original he would have come up with it on his own, instead of cult following the prisoner tv show much like Trekkies do Star Trek, JMO. Not really a leader of the pack IMO, just a follower actually. """"instead of cult following the prisoner tv show much like Trekkies do Star Trek, JMO. Not really a leader of the pack IMO, just a follower actually""". Soooo this is what a wolf really sounds like. And as for Prisoner, he is doing..."EXACTLY" what he wants on here...Getting the wolves to look at his profile and then go off topic and start whinning about what he says and how he says it...I call that...original. Keep up the good work Prisoner you profile is doing it's job and you are getting more hits on your threads than the people that put up the long and drawn out diatribe threads....JMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phuque...will you marry me? be seeing you She turns me on too, esp., when she hits the nail on the head, after two hours of sarcastic comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*sigh* I was referring to the Wolf-pack Mentality thread...in direct response to your statement: "I didn't see any "wolf-pack" going on here". I hope you're not being intentionally obtuse.. ___________________________________________________ I don't remember a wolf-pack thread. I didn't feel that I needed to say anything about my statement. I don't see any wolf-packing on this thread. Why would you hope that I'm not being intentionally obtuse? Also, this is getting very "off-topic". OK...I went back to page three of General Disc. & found the thread. I did indeed misquote you (well, I actually said "you may have said")...it was someone else that said they were unaware of the wolf-pack...& I do apologise for that. But you are in that thread giving reasons for why a person might be accused of being a fake for not having a pic. I also asked you if all should pay for a few fakes...a rational that I find very "pack-like". So...that clears up THAT. As far as being on topic or not...in this thread, Prisoner is being "rated" for his tag "be seeing you"...of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion...but again, I do see this as an attack on his originality, especially when asked (whether or not the word "please" was used) to change his posting style....& again, representing pack-like behaviour...*shrug* I've said my peace... Phuque... I do not understand how you can "be seeing you" as original when he just copying a tv show, if it was truly original he would have come up with it on his own, instead of cult following the prisoner tv show much like Trekkies do Star Trek, JMO. Not really a leader of the pack IMO, just a follower actually. """"instead of cult following the prisoner tv show much like Trekkies do Star Trek, JMO. Not really a leader of the pack IMO, just a follower actually""". Soooo this is what a wolf really sounds like. And as for Prisoner, he is doing..."EXACTLY" what he wants on here...Getting the wolves to look at his profile and then go off topic and start whinning about what he says and how he says it...I call that...original. Keep up the good work Prisoner you profile is doing it's job and you are getting more hits on your threads than the people that put up the long and drawn out diatribe threads....JMO I'm not really sure how I see it as being original at all. He's using something from a TV show... in every single post. Sure, at first it gets attention, but now that everyone knows what it means, it's definitely not original. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whats so very original is the great reaction and the fire that is created from a few words. George Carlin had the right idea, use words to get a reaction, then have a congessman tell you not to use them, then use them more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whats so very original is the great reaction and the fire that is created from a few words. George Carlin had the right idea, use words to get a reaction, then have a congessman tell you not to use them, then use them more. No, its not original, just annoying, just as much as the fact that he doesnt care about the dude whos wife he boinks or that he hurts feeling of divorcees by asking for there soon to be ex or ex wifes number or the impact on others psyche's that he may affect, JMO No original was DiVinci, Carlin (never copied others no matter how much SH!t he started), Jim and John Belushi, Houdini, Shakespear and Beethoven. He may be controversial, but original NO, NOT AT ALL...Just a cult follower making waves and hurting people with rudeness when he can...AGAIN IMO!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whats so very original is the great reaction and the fire that is created from a few words. George Carlin had the right idea, use words to get a reaction, then have a congessman tell you not to use them, then use them more. Just doing something for a reaction like he does is not being original. He's just doing it for the reaction. Now, if it were something he came up with all on his own perhaps it might be a little original. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say all the women here are totally into you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say all the women here are totally into you  total turn on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say all the women here are totally into you  It's not just women.
|
|
|
|
|
