100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: The Republican Party! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
They claimed they had none, when the world new they bought some and was looking for more. They hid it from the inspectors. It took an occupation to find it. The fact that the material was under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for more than a decade opens an entirely different line of questioning: Is the entire group of United Nations bureaucrats running the IAEA legally insane? http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/07/about_that_500_tons_of_yellow.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
he economy was doomed as soon as they gave the federal reserve the money supply in 1913
prez at the time was a dem Woodrow Wilson Like Roosevelt before him, Woodrow Wilson regarded himself as the personal representative of the people. "No one but the President," he said, "seems to be expected ... to look out for the general interests of the country." He developed a program of progressive reform and asserted international leadership in building a new world order. In 1917 he proclaimed American entrance into World War I a crusade to make the world "safe for democracy." ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Wilson maneuvered through Congress three major pieces of legislation. The first was a lower tariff, the Underwood Act; attached to the measure was a graduated Federal income tax. The passage of the Federal Reserve Act provided the Nation with the more elastic money supply it badly needed. In 1914 antitrust legislation established a Federal Trade Commission to prohibit unfair business practices. ------------------------- He was nominated for President at the 1912 Democratic Convention ------------------------- lower tariff ---- leads to free trade Federal income tax --- do i need to say anything on this The passage of the Federal Reserve Act ------------------------- those are the three most burdensome issues on the economy today http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/ww28.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is something Obama will have to decide. Better to stop the threat to Israel and Pakistan now than after Iran starts screaming again that Israel should be removed from the map. It's so obvious that Iran is just buying time while preparing to put warheads together. They also threaten the West as well. Destroying their capability now will bring about regime change. I do not mean that we should invade. Don't forget, Iran, like Iraq is now in violation of IAEC (International Atomic Energy Commission; i.e. United Nations) Also, last year several tons of yellow-cake (Uranium sulfate) were found in Iraq and sent to Canada for processing into reactor fuel). How many innocent people will suffer and die when a nuclear weapon is used ? And where will it end ? The report on Snopes says it was all still stored materials from before 1991, before the first invasion, from nuclear reactors that were destroyed in the 1980's http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is something Obama will have to decide. Better to stop the threat to Israel and Pakistan now than after Iran starts screaming again that Israel should be removed from the map. It's so obvious that Iran is just buying time while preparing to put warheads together. They also threaten the West as well. Destroying their capability now will bring about regime change. I do not mean that we should invade. Don't forget, Iran, like Iraq is now in violation of IAEC (International Atomic Energy Commission; i.e. United Nations) Also, last year several tons of yellow-cake (Uranium sulfate) were found in Iraq and sent to Canada for processing into reactor fuel). How many innocent people will suffer and die when a nuclear weapon is used ? And where will it end ? The report on Snopes says it was all still stored materials from before 1991, before the first invasion, from nuclear reactors that were destroyed in the 1980's http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp I may be missing something here, but haven't we had nuclear weapons for years? Why would we be so arrogant to think that we are the only ones who should? Oh, yeah, our allies can have them, too, right? No intimidation there! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is something Obama will have to decide. Better to stop the threat to Israel and Pakistan now than after Iran starts screaming again that Israel should be removed from the map. It's so obvious that Iran is just buying time while preparing to put warheads together. They also threaten the West as well. Destroying their capability now will bring about regime change. I do not mean that we should invade. Don't forget, Iran, like Iraq is now in violation of IAEC (International Atomic Energy Commission; i.e. United Nations) Also, last year several tons of yellow-cake (Uranium sulfate) were found in Iraq and sent to Canada for processing into reactor fuel). How many innocent people will suffer and die when a nuclear weapon is used ? And where will it end ? The report on Snopes says it was all still stored materials from before 1991, before the first invasion, from nuclear reactors that were destroyed in the 1980's http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp I may be missing something here, but haven't we had nuclear weapons for years? Why would we be so arrogant to think that we are the only ones who should? Oh, yeah, our allies can have them, too, right? No intimidation there!
you left out the united states is the only country to ever use atomic weapons at a time of war, on another country. interesting, very interesting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is something Obama will have to decide. Better to stop the threat to Israel and Pakistan now than after Iran starts screaming again that Israel should be removed from the map. It's so obvious that Iran is just buying time while preparing to put warheads together. They also threaten the West as well. Destroying their capability now will bring about regime change. I do not mean that we should invade. Don't forget, Iran, like Iraq is now in violation of IAEC (International Atomic Energy Commission; i.e. United Nations) Also, last year several tons of yellow-cake (Uranium sulfate) were found in Iraq and sent to Canada for processing into reactor fuel). How many innocent people will suffer and die when a nuclear weapon is used ? And where will it end ? The report on Snopes says it was all still stored materials from before 1991, before the first invasion, from nuclear reactors that were destroyed in the 1980's http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp I may be missing something here, but haven't we had nuclear weapons for years? Why would we be so arrogant to think that we are the only ones who should? Oh, yeah, our allies can have them, too, right? No intimidation there!
you left out the united states is the only country to ever use atomic weapons at a time of war, on another country. interesting, very interesting Not to mention a little crisis back in October 1962. We've lost sight of the fact that we should not want to destroy our enemy, but to avoid destroying one another. Why would we think these other countries are not as cautious as us about possession of these weapons? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary
google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quick, decisive action, slow agonizing misery.  You make the call. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quick, decisive action, slow agonizing misery. You make the call.
well there are those that feel truman prolonged the war (refused peace talks with japan) so he could use the bomb. in doing so they say his idea was to keep the soviets in line. so which was it really |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal. Agreed! How many innocent people do your stats there say have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal. Agreed! How many innocent people do your stats there say have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal. Agreed! How many innocent people do your stats there say have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? The number is shocking and sobering. It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on a scientific study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003. That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.) The estimate that over a million Iraqis have died received independent confirmation from a prestigious British polling agency in September 2007. Opinion Research Business estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis have been killed violently since the US-led invasion. This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20077.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quick, decisive action, slow agonizing misery. You make the call.
well there are those that feel truman prolonged the war (refused peace talks with japan) so he could use the bomb. in doing so they say his idea was to keep the soviets in line. so which was it really I say both! What you say? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal. Agreed! How many innocent people do your stats there say have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? The number is shocking and sobering. It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on a scientific study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003. That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.) The estimate that over a million Iraqis have died received independent confirmation from a prestigious British polling agency in September 2007. Opinion Research Business estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis have been killed violently since the US-led invasion. This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20077.htm Ding, ding, ding! Give the boy a prize! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal. Agreed! How many innocent people do your stats there say have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? The number is shocking and sobering. It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on a scientific study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003. That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.) The estimate that over a million Iraqis have died received independent confirmation from a prestigious British polling agency in September 2007. Opinion Research Business estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis have been killed violently since the US-led invasion. This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20077.htm Ding, ding, ding! Give the boy a prize!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quick, decisive action, slow agonizing misery. You make the call.
well there are those that feel truman prolonged the war (refused peace talks with japan) so he could use the bomb. in doing so they say his idea was to keep the soviets in line. so which was it really I say both! What you say? what i say is the united states needs to go back to isolationism as much as possible. i know complete isolation is impossible but the federal govt is suposed to be run on tarriffs and excise taxes. and they are abolishing those forms of income and charging the people directly. that is a clear violation of the constitution. what do i say the federal govt needs a complete overhaul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useing the Nurenburg laws as a gage I would say the atomic bombing of japan was a war crime. It is illegal to knowingly bomb civilian targets. Good thing we won the war. Lets face it war is a last option not a first. That is were Bush screwed up he was hell bent on war, he misled congress and the american people. In my book he is a war criminal. Agreed! How many innocent people do your stats there say have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan? The number is shocking and sobering. It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on a scientific study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003. That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.) The estimate that over a million Iraqis have died received independent confirmation from a prestigious British polling agency in September 2007. Opinion Research Business estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis have been killed violently since the US-led invasion. This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20077.htm Ding, ding, ding! Give the boy a prize!
Ok, ok, but ya gotta send instructions on how to convert a a dime store stuffed animal! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quick, decisive action, slow agonizing misery. You make the call.
well there are those that feel truman prolonged the war (refused peace talks with japan) so he could use the bomb. in doing so they say his idea was to keep the soviets in line. so which was it really I say both! What you say? what i say is the united states needs to go back to isolationism as much as possible. i know complete isolation is impossible but the federal govt is suposed to be run on tarriffs and excise taxes. and they are abolishing those forms of income and charging the people directly. that is a clear violation of the constitution. what do i say the federal govt needs a complete overhaul Agreed on overhaul. Isolationism is next to impossible in this day and time and, Imo, is what got us into this predicament. We, as a people, have come to expect more money to be available than tariffs and excise tax would bring in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ya wanna see something really scary google northwood yep kennedy was a democrat as was truman (the prez that used atomic weapons on another country) hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quick, decisive action, slow agonizing misery. You make the call.
well there are those that feel truman prolonged the war (refused peace talks with japan) so he could use the bomb. in doing so they say his idea was to keep the soviets in line. so which was it really I say both! What you say? what i say is the united states needs to go back to isolationism as much as possible. i know complete isolation is impossible but the federal govt is suposed to be run on tarriffs and excise taxes. and they are abolishing those forms of income and charging the people directly. that is a clear violation of the constitution. what do i say the federal govt needs a complete overhaul Agreed on overhaul. Isolationism is next to impossible in this day and time and, Imo, is what got us into this predicament. We, as a people, have come to expect more money to be available than tariffs and excise tax would bring in. |
|
|
|
|
