Topic: CLAIRVOYANCE and Occult Powers
Abracadabra's photo
Mon 12/08/08 08:57 PM

It is written:

"In the old Egyptian days, a well known inscription was carved over the portal of the Temple of Isis: 'I am whatever has been, is, or ever will be; and my veil no man hath yet lifted.' Not thus do modern seekers after truth confront Nature—the word that stands for the baffling mysteries of the Universe. Steadily, unflinchingly, we strive to pierce the inmost heart of Nature, from what she is to reconstruct what she has been, and to prophesy what she shall be. Veil after veil we have lifted, and her face grows more beautiful, august and wonderful, with every barrier that is withdrawn."

----------

showing that perhaps telepathy and communication to the dead such as the "The Book of the Dead" was actually something accessible if people 8000 years ago actually had that sixth and seventh sense. Although many would say it is just mythology and stories made up by a creative mind, but just maybe some of the scribes as of the higher officials really had the ability to talk with the spirits at the time to do such rituals to ressurrect or go through the process of what is required from the "Book of the Dead".

Very interesting:smile:


I do believe that much of what is written in "The Bible" was indeed inspired by spirit.

I put "The Bible" in quotes because it's seriously not a single book, nor was it ever intended to be a single book. It is a collection of various stories, each story being a potential concoction of many tales itself.

While they may be some truths in some parts of some of some of these stories, the idea that "The Bible" represents the infallible word of a single egotistical jealous Godhead is utterly absurd to me.

It's far more likely that the vast majority of it was not spiritually inspired and just the demagoguery of man.

None the less, I can see where some parts of the Bible may hold some spiritual truth. But I see that in other doctines and writings as well.

As you point out here, the Egyptians certainly appear to have had contact with the spirit world, as did the Mayans, and many other cultures throughtout the world.

So, yes, there probably are remants of actaul spiritual contacts sprinkled sparsely thoughout the biblical myths.

But at the same time, I seriously doubt that any gods told anyone to stone anyone to death.

I highly question the validity of any sincere spirits asking anyone to sacrifice animals or people to them either.

So when I see that kind of stuff I think more in terms of mortal men who were merely psycho rather than psychic.

I think there's a fine line.

In fact, we all know that there is a fine line because we've seen on the news where women have killed their childern under the belief that God told them to do it.

We've seen serial killers claim that God told them to do it.

Even Hitler believed that he was doing the will of God when he ordered the mass murdering of Jew.

George Bush once said that God told him to invade Iraq. ohwell

The bottom line is that we have far too many examples of real people who think that God told them to do utterly insane things.

So why would we be so naive as to believe that all of the authors that wrote ancient stories that ended up being chosen to be put into a book called the "Holy Bible" should all be trusted.

That's the bottom line. People who put their faith in a book are putting their faith in the author of the book, and not in anyone else (i.e. God).



no photo
Mon 12/08/08 09:09 PM
Edited by smiless on Mon 12/08/08 09:12 PM


It is written:

"In the old Egyptian days, a well known inscription was carved over the portal of the Temple of Isis: 'I am whatever has been, is, or ever will be; and my veil no man hath yet lifted.' Not thus do modern seekers after truth confront Nature—the word that stands for the baffling mysteries of the Universe. Steadily, unflinchingly, we strive to pierce the inmost heart of Nature, from what she is to reconstruct what she has been, and to prophesy what she shall be. Veil after veil we have lifted, and her face grows more beautiful, august and wonderful, with every barrier that is withdrawn."

----------

showing that perhaps telepathy and communication to the dead such as the "The Book of the Dead" was actually something accessible if people 8000 years ago actually had that sixth and seventh sense. Although many would say it is just mythology and stories made up by a creative mind, but just maybe some of the scribes as of the higher officials really had the ability to talk with the spirits at the time to do such rituals to ressurrect or go through the process of what is required from the "Book of the Dead".

Very interesting:smile:


I do believe that much of what is written in "The Bible" was indeed inspired by spirit.

I put "The Bible" in quotes because it's seriously not a single book, nor was it ever intended to be a single book. It is a collection of various stories, each story being a potential concoction of many tales itself.

While they may be some truths in some parts of some of some of these stories, the idea that "The Bible" represents the infallible word of a single egotistical jealous Godhead is utterly absurd to me.

It's far more likely that the vast majority of it was not spiritually inspired and just the demagoguery of man.

None the less, I can see where some parts of the Bible may hold some spiritual truth. But I see that in other doctines and writings as well.

As you point out here, the Egyptians certainly appear to have had contact with the spirit world, as did the Mayans, and many other cultures throughtout the world.

So, yes, there probably are remants of actaul spiritual contacts sprinkled sparsely thoughout the biblical myths.

But at the same time, I seriously doubt that any gods told anyone to stone anyone to death.

I highly question the validity of any sincere spirits asking anyone to sacrifice animals or people to them either.

So when I see that kind of stuff I think more in terms of mortal men who were merely psycho rather than psychic.

I think there's a fine line.

In fact, we all know that there is a fine line because we've seen on the news where women have killed their childern under the belief that God told them to do it.

We've seen serial killers claim that God told them to do it.

Even Hitler believed that he was doing the will of God when he ordered the mass murdering of Jew.

George Bush once said that God told him to invade Iraq. ohwell

The bottom line is that we have far too many examples of real people who think that God told them to do utterly insane things.

So why would we be so naive as to believe that all of the authors that wrote ancient stories that ended up being chosen to be put into a book called the "Holy Bible" should all be trusted.

That's the bottom line. People who put their faith in a book are putting their faith in the author of the book, and not in anyone else (i.e. God).





I agree that the bible as of other documents before Mediterrenean Mythologies were construed in terms of manmade frustrations and greed for power. I also even believe that many of the writings are nothing more then imagination of bored scholars perhapslaugh , yet the very idea of thinking of ways to use supernatural senses has always fascinated me. The very idea of who came up with something more then the normally humdrums of life.

That is where that sixth and seventh sense comes in place. Did we as humans have something natural at one time such as talking to souls, spirits, the dead, knowledge on ressurrecting, etc. and over time have just forgotten it to remain to our basic five senses?

no photo
Mon 12/08/08 09:27 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 12/08/08 09:34 PM
I don't think the 6th and 7th senses include talking to the dead but I would not swear to that.

In this book he says that the 6th sense is to be able to sense the presence of another living thing, even when you cannot see it, and the 7th sense is telepathy.

I think these two natural senses are very closely related to each other.

Telepathy is a sense of the "feeling" or "intentions" coming from another living creature and if you sense that then naturally you can sense another creature before you can actually see it.

I once walked into the energy field of a very disturbed man who came into the bar I was working at. It was an extended field of energy that surrounded him by about six to ten feet away from him. I had never felt such a thing before, but this was like walking into a bubble.

As soon as I was inside of this energy field, I sense his intentions, or at least I thought I did. I sensed he was so angry that he wanted to reach across the bar and kill me. I did not know him and had never seen him before in my life.

He was very disturbed. Or at least that was what I sensed. He gave me no visible indication of this, but I was very frightened at that point. (I could feel my heart beat speed up and adrenalin began to course through my body.)

I did not come any closer nor did I ask him if he wanted a drink. (And I was the bar tender!) I just turned around and walked away. I went and sat at the end of the bar and hoped and visualized that he would leave. He did... thank God.

To this day I wonder what that was all about and what might have happened if I had gotten close to him. I honestly felt that he wanted to kill me and that he was very disturbed.

jb




no photo
Mon 12/08/08 09:34 PM

I don't think the 6th and 7th senses include talking to the dead but I would not swear to that.

In this book he says that the 6th sense is to be able to sense the presence of another living thing, even when you cannot see it, and the 7th sense is telepathy.

I think these two natural senses are very closely related to each other.

Telepathy is a sense of the "feeling" or "intentions" coming from another living creature and if you sense that then naturally you can sense another creature before you can actually see it.

I once walked into the energy field of a very disturbed man who came into the bar I was working at. It was an extended field of energy that surrounded him by about six to ten feet away from him. I had never felt such a thing before, but this was like walking into a bubble.

As soon as I was inside of this energy field, I sense his intentions, or at least I thought I did. I sensed he was so angry that he wanted to reach across the bar and kill me. I did not know him and had never seen him before in my life.

He was very disturbed. Or at least that was what I sensed. He gave me no visible indication of this, but I was very frightened at that point. (I could feel my heart beat speed up and adrenalin began to course through my body.)

I did not come any closer nor did I ask him if he wanted a drink. (And I was the bar tender!) I just turned around and walked away. I went and sat at the end of the bar and hoped and visualized that he would leave. He did... thank God.

jb






I have always heard that animals have a sixth sense. Like a dog or a cat can sense if you are sad or even about to die! Seen some amazing stories on cats in hospitals that if they lay next to the patient the doctors would know they would die the next day.

As for humans having a sixth sense will you are a living witness who has experienced it. Therefore, we have it also.

Concerning the seventh sense to be able to use telepathy to other humans, animals, or even a soul or the dead, I am not sure about. I mean I never leave it out of the question as many claim they have this ability.

That is where that 10 step program needs to take place to find outlaugh

no photo
Mon 12/08/08 09:38 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 12/08/08 09:38 PM
I have a couple of personal experiences with telepathy or thought transference that has convinced me beyond any doubt that we have that ability. I think with a little practice we could regain it with people we are close to.

no photo
Mon 12/08/08 09:40 PM

I have a couple of personal experiences with telepathy or thought transference that has convinced me beyond any doubt that we have that ability. I think with a little practice we could regain it with people we are close to.


I wonder how long did it take you to attain this knowledge and ability to do telepathy. Does it take a long time? Is it possible that everyone can learn it if the person is sincere and willing enough to learn it, or is it only possible to a select individuals.

Please share your thoughts if you like:smile:

no photo
Mon 12/08/08 10:15 PM


I have a couple of personal experiences with telepathy or thought transference that has convinced me beyond any doubt that we have that ability. I think with a little practice we could regain it with people we are close to.


I wonder how long did it take you to attain this knowledge and ability to do telepathy. Does it take a long time? Is it possible that everyone can learn it if the person is sincere and willing enough to learn it, or is it only possible to a select individuals.

Please share your thoughts if you like:smile:




I tried it as an experiment with a person I was involved with. It was done without their consent. I wanted to plant some of my ideas into his brain. This was a subliminal suggestion (hypnotism) via telepathy.

He was asleep on my couch. I laid across his chest and with all the emotion I could muster, I sent my thoughts into him.

It worked in that his head was filled with my thoughts and my way of thinking, but as all hypnotism, it was only temporary.

The way I knew it worked is because about three days later I noticed him looking at me very suspiciously. He would shake his head as if he were trying to shake out my thoughts.

Then it was confirmed when he finally asked me, "What did you do?" I did not know what he was talking about and I told him so. (I did not know if it had worked.)

He then told me that he had been thinking "like me" for the past three days and he did not want to think like me. I asked him what he meant by that, and he said that all of my ideas about things were in his head and he was not comfortable with them. He did not agree with them. He was trying to shake them out of his head.

I was really amazed as I did not know it could work. It did not take long for him to shed this covert hypnotic brainwashing, but I then knew that I had transferred my ideas and thoughts to him.

I was young and foolish. I never tried anything like that again, as it is silly and only temporary.... but damn!

The thing that I think really helped drive (transfer) the thoughts was the emotion behind them.

jb


ganonzyther's photo
Tue 12/09/08 12:10 AM
To Smiless: Yes, just about anything in the occult CAN be accomplished by the layperson. It takes practice and work, just like anything else. But you have to realize that not everything that you read is going to coincide with what your intuition is telling you. You shouldn't try and force yourself to see what it is that someone else wants you to see. Take the general concept and aligning ideas and run with it. You should also be glad to have so many people willing to be test subjects as you're learning. While you're on tarot, you may want to look up palmistry and auras as future endeavors. Oh, and anyone that tries to tell you that only certain people can do these kinds of things is probably a fraud and a charlatan. Certain people are more easily attuned to such things, yes. But they are not sect exclusive powers.

I'm interested to see if this guy has anything to say that I haven't heard before, but to be honest, I don't think that his 6th sense is anything but an understanding that there is someone/thing with intent. Which is just the most basic form of his named 7th sense. Or, just the manifestation of using what he has defined as the 5 astral senses in the vicinity of your person. Though I suppose it's the thing he's been talking about that I use the most. I'm sure it happens, but 9 times out of 10, if someone comes into my room while I'm asleep, I am immediately awake and alert. It's not that I'm a light sleeper either. If I fall asleep on the couch, you can have the tv on and be going to and fro as you please. Plus, I sleep with my door open. And I catch my flatmate peering in on me some mornings. Hell, most mornings, that *ss.

Him - "Hey, you're up. Now you can make me pancakes."
Me - "Pissoff." ::goes back to sleep::

I'd say it's kind of annoying really. Though I guess it'll be useful if I ever start receiving death threats from somewhere.

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 05:04 AM



I have a couple of personal experiences with telepathy or thought transference that has convinced me beyond any doubt that we have that ability. I think with a little practice we could regain it with people we are close to.


I wonder how long did it take you to attain this knowledge and ability to do telepathy. Does it take a long time? Is it possible that everyone can learn it if the person is sincere and willing enough to learn it, or is it only possible to a select individuals.

Please share your thoughts if you like:smile:




I tried it as an experiment with a person I was involved with. It was done without their consent. I wanted to plant some of my ideas into his brain. This was a subliminal suggestion (hypnotism) via telepathy.

He was asleep on my couch. I laid across his chest and with all the emotion I could muster, I sent my thoughts into him.

It worked in that his head was filled with my thoughts and my way of thinking, but as all hypnotism, it was only temporary.

The way I knew it worked is because about three days later I noticed him looking at me very suspiciously. He would shake his head as if he were trying to shake out my thoughts.

Then it was confirmed when he finally asked me, "What did you do?" I did not know what he was talking about and I told him so. (I did not know if it had worked.)

He then told me that he had been thinking "like me" for the past three days and he did not want to think like me. I asked him what he meant by that, and he said that all of my ideas about things were in his head and he was not comfortable with them. He did not agree with them. He was trying to shake them out of his head.

I was really amazed as I did not know it could work. It did not take long for him to shed this covert hypnotic brainwashing, but I then knew that I had transferred my ideas and thoughts to him.

I was young and foolish. I never tried anything like that again, as it is silly and only temporary.... but damn!

The thing that I think really helped drive (transfer) the thoughts was the emotion behind them.

jb




Very interesting Jeannie. I would say that what you did can only be explained on how you did it with yourself. I guess one has to have strong emotions to enter a mind, or maybe the ability to somehow extract waves into the mind to be able to transfer the thoughts somehow. You have a gift. It is to bad you didn't continue to practice this more often even when you was young. I don't know anyone who can do this at all, so that is amazing.

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 05:10 AM
Edited by smiless on Tue 12/09/08 05:52 AM

To Smiless: Yes, just about anything in the occult CAN be accomplished by the layperson. It takes practice and work, just like anything else. But you have to realize that not everything that you read is going to coincide with what your intuition is telling you. You shouldn't try and force yourself to see what it is that someone else wants you to see. Take the general concept and aligning ideas and run with it. You should also be glad to have so many people willing to be test subjects as you're learning. While you're on tarot, you may want to look up palmistry and auras as future endeavors. Oh, and anyone that tries to tell you that only certain people can do these kinds of things is probably a fraud and a charlatan. Certain people are more easily attuned to such things, yes. But they are not sect exclusive powers.

I'm interested to see if this guy has anything to say that I haven't heard before, but to be honest, I don't think that his 6th sense is anything but an understanding that there is someone/thing with intent. Which is just the most basic form of his named 7th sense. Or, just the manifestation of using what he has defined as the 5 astral senses in the vicinity of your person. Though I suppose it's the thing he's been talking about that I use the most. I'm sure it happens, but 9 times out of 10, if someone comes into my room while I'm asleep, I am immediately awake and alert. It's not that I'm a light sleeper either. If I fall asleep on the couch, you can have the tv on and be going to and fro as you please. Plus, I sleep with my door open. And I catch my flatmate peering in on me some mornings. Hell, most mornings, that *ss.

Him - "Hey, you're up. Now you can make me pancakes."
Me - "Pissoff." ::goes back to sleep::

I'd say it's kind of annoying really. Though I guess it'll be useful if I ever start receiving death threats from somewhere.


Very interesting that you have this (sixth sense) to know ahead when someone is there in the room when you are asleep. Others would say it is a consequence each time that you are awake when someone enters the room, yet I can't believe that it is everytime a consequence that this happens. So yes you have this sixth sense or whatever you want to call it. Very interesting indeed.

I will take a look into palmistry also one day. I had it once done to me by a Hindu. He said I would have a long life and become really rich.laugh Here I am 25 years later wondering if he said would be true. I may live a long life, but still I am not rich (not that this is important to me)laugh Nevertheless, it is interesting.

I will try not to force the idealogy as you suggest and just get the concept of how it may work. I mean I barely understand any of the concept now because I haven't had a person exactly explain how it works concerning telepathy. It seems so eluded to me. I wish truly there was a 10 step program on how to do telepathy, but in the long run maybe it is a good thing that there isn't for then everybody would be reading everybodies minds and our speech would decline because we never use itlaugh

It reminds me when I ask about a hard question in religion and my answer is just go to section so and so and read it and you will understand. For me it is like a cop out of saving time to explain this to me. In the long run I just come to the conclusion that no one exactly knows.

Thank you for the suggestions. They are very helpful:smile: In time I will know more as long as I stay interested in it and I always welcome more information if available:smile:

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 05:49 AM
Edited by smiless on Tue 12/09/08 06:18 AM

LESSON IV
SCIENTIFIC TELEPATHY


The important investigations of the Society for Psychical Research. True telepathy and pseudo-telepathy; how they are distinguished by scientists. Strict tests imposed in investigations. The celebrated "Creery Experiments," and how they were conducted. The elaboration of the "guessing" game. Seventeen cards chosen right, in straight succession. Precautions against fraud or collusion. Two hundred and ten successes out of a possible three hundred and eighty-two. Science pronounces the results as entirely beyond the law of coincidences and mathematical probability; and that the phenomena were genuine and real telepathy. Still more wonderful tests. Telepathy an incontestable reality. "A psychic force transmitting ideas and thoughts." Interesting cases of spontaneous telepathy, scientifically proven. Extracts from the scientific records. Cold scientific reports read like a romance, and prove beyond doubt the reality of this great field of phenomena.

Next post....




Very interesting that one can see what kind of card one is holding without knowing what it is. This experiment they did shows that psychic force can transmit ideas into thoughts. It reminds me of a episode in Star Wars Episode 1 where the young boy Anakin Skywalker can tell the jedi masters what kind of ship they are displaying on a screen that only the jedi masters can see.

The question is does the individual read the mind of the person who is displaying the card to find out what he is holding as a card, or does he just see through the card and knows. Or is he actually just darn luckylaugh

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 07:41 AM
LESSON V
MIND-READING, AND BEYOND


What "Mind-Reading" is. The two phases of Mind-Reading. Mind-Reading with physical contact; and without physical contact. Why the scientific investigators make the distinction. Why science has been over-cautious; and how it falls short of the full understanding of contact Mind-Reading. How the thought-waves flow along the nerves of the projector and recipient. Like telegraphy over wires, as compared with the wireless method. How to learn by actual experience, and not alone by reading books. How to experiment for yourself; and how to obtain the best results in Mind-Reading. The working principles of Mind-Reading stated. Full directions and instruction given for the successful performance of the interesting feats. This lesson is really a little manual of practical instruction in Mind-Reading, and the higher phases of Thought-Transference. The person carefully studying and applying the principles taught therein should become very proficient in both private and public manifestations.

Continuted in Next post.....

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 07:42 AM
LESSON V.

MIND READING, AND BEYOND.



The simpler forms of telepathic phenomena have received the name "Mind Reading" and by some have been regarded as something not quite within the class of real telepathy. This last impression has been heightened by the fact that there has been offered the public many spectacular exhibitions of pseudo mind-reading, that is to say, imitation or counterfeit mind-reading, in which the result has been obtained by trickery, collusion, or clever artifice. But, notwithstanding this fact, genuine mind-reading is actually a phase of true telepathy.

What is generally known as mind-reading may be divided into two classes, as follows: (1) where there is an actual physical contact between the projector and the receiver; and (2) where there is no actual physical contact, but where there is a close relation in space between the two parties, as in the case of the "willing game." In the first class belong all cases in which the projector touches the recipient, or at least is connected with him by a material object. In the second class belong those cases in which the recipient seeks to find an object which is being thought of by either a single projector, or by a number of persons in the same room. You will notice that both of these classes were omitted from the experiments of the Society for Psychical Research, because of the possibility of fraud or collusion. But, nevertheless, the student will do well to acquire proficiency in manifesting this form of telepathy, not alone for its own sake, but, also, because it naturally leads to higher development.

In the case of the first class of mind-reading namely, that in which actual physical contact is had between the projector and the recipient, there has been a disposition on the part of some authorities to explain the whole matter by the theory of unconscious muscular impulse of the projector; but those who have carefully studied this subject, and who have themselves performed the feats of this class of mind-reading, know that there is far more than this to it. Those familiar with the subject know that there is a decided transference of thought-waves from the projector to the recipient, and that the latter actually "feels" the same as they strike upon his mental receiving apparatus. The whole difference between this and the higher forms of telepathy is that in this the thought-currents generally run along the wires of the nervous system, instead of leaping across the space between the two persons.

It is known to all who have conducted this class of experiments, that at times there will be experienced a change or shifting in the transmission of the thought-currents. For a time, the thought-waves will be felt flowing in along the nerves of the hands and arms when, all of a sudden this will cease, and there will be experienced the passage of the current direct from brain to brain. It is impossible to describe this feeling in mere words, to those who have never experienced it. But those to whom it has once been manifested will recognize at once just what I mean by this statement. It is a different sensation from any other in the experience of a human being, and must actually be experienced to be understood. The nearest analogy I can offer is that feeling experienced by the person when a forgotten name for which he has vainly sought, suddenly flashes or leaps into his consciousness—it is felt to come from somewhere outside of the conscious field. Well, in the case of the thought-current the feeling is much the same, only there is a fuller sense of the "outsideness" of the source of the thought.

In order to make you understand the distinction between the two classes of mind-reading more clearly, I will say that you may think of one as akin to the ordinary telegraphy over wires; and of the other as akin to wireless telegraphy. It is the same force in both cases, the difference being simply one of the details of transmission. Fix this idea firmly in your mind, and you will have no trouble in always having the right conception of any kind of case of mind-reading, or telepathy. But, you must remember, there are cases in which there is a combination of both methods of transmission, either simultaneously, or else shifting and changing from one to the other.

I will here remind the student that he will learn more by a half-dozen actual experiments in mind-reading, than he will by reading a dozen books on the subject. It is very good to read the books in order to get the correct theory well fixed in mind, and also in order to learn the best methods as taught by those who have had a wide experience in the subject; but the real "how" of the matter is learned only through actual experience. So, I shall now give you advice and instructions concerning actual experimental work.

You, the student, should begin by making yourself a good recipient—that is a good "mind reader," allowing others to play the part of projector. Later on, you may play the part of projector, if you so desire, but the real "fine work" is done by the recipient, and, for that reason that is the part you should learn to play by frequent rehearsals.

I advise you to begin your experiments with friends who are in sympathy with you, and who are interested in the subject. Avoid particularly all early experiments with uncongenial or unsympathetic persons; and avoid as you would a pestilence all those who are antagonistic either to yourself or to the general subject of telepathy and kindred subjects. As you must make yourself especially "sensitive" in order to successfully conduct a mind-reading test, you will find yourself particularly susceptible to the mental attitude of those around you at such times, and therefore should surround yourself only with those who are congenial and sympathetic.

You will find that there is a great difference between the several persons whom you "try out" as projectors. Some will be more "en rapport" with you than are others who may be equally good friends. "En rapport," you know, means "in vibrational harmony." When two persons are en rapport with each other, they are like two wireless telegraphic instruments perfectly attuned to each other. In such cases there are obtained the very best results. You will soon learn to distinguish the degree of en rapport conditions between yourself and different persons—you soon learn to "feel" this condition. In the beginning, it will be well for you to try several persons, one after the other, in your mind-reading experiments, in order to pick out the best one, and also to learn the "feel" of the different degrees of en rapport condition.

Even in cases of persons in whom the en rapport conditions are good, it is well to establish a rhythmic unison between you. This is done by both you and the person breathing in rhythmic unison a few moments. Begin by counting "one-two-three-four," like the slow ticking of a large clock. Have the other person join with you in so counting, until your minds both work in the same rhythmic time. Then you should have him breathe in unison with you, making a mental count with you at the same time, so that you will "breathe together." Count (mentally) "one-two-three-four," as you inhale; the "one-two," holding the breath; and, then "one-two-three-four," exhaling or breathing-out. Try this several times, and, you will find that you have established a rhythmic unison between yourself and the other person. In the progress of an experiment, if you should find that the conditions are not as good as might be desired, you will do well to pause for a few moments and re-establish the proper rhythmic harmony by this method of harmonious rhythmic breathing.

Begin by having the projector select some prominent object in the room, a chair, or table for instance. Then have him take your left hand in his right hand. Raise your left hand, held in his right hand, to your forehead; then close your eyes and remain passive a few moments. Have him concentrate his mind intently on the selected object—and will that you should move toward it. Have him think of nothing else except that object, and to will you to move toward it, with all his power. Close your eyes, and quiet your mind, opening your consciousness to every mental impression that he may send you. Instruct him to think not merely "chair," for instance, but rather "there—go there." The main thought in his mind must be that of direction. He must will that you move toward that chair.

After a moment or two, you will begin to feel a vague, general impulse to move your feet. Obey the impulse. Take a few slow steps in any direction that seems easy to you. Sometimes this will take you in an opposite direction from that of the chair, but it will "get you going," and you will soon begin to feel that the direction is "all wrong," and will begin to be mentally pulled in the right direction. You will have to actually experience this feeling, before you will fully understand just what I mean.

After some little practice, you will begin to feel quite distinctly the mental direction, or will-force, of the projector, which will seem to tell you to "come this way—now stop—now turn a little to the right—now a little to the left—now stop where you are, and put out your right hand—lower your hand—move your hand a little to the right—that's it, now you have got it all right." You will soon learn to distinguish between the "no, that's wrong" thought, and the "that's right" one; and between the "go on," and the "come on" one. By making yourself completely passive, and receptive and obedient to the thought and will-impulses of the projector, you will soon act like a ship under the influence of the rudder in the hand of the projector.

After you have attained proficiency in receiving the mental impressions and directions, you will find yourself attracted or drawn, like a piece of steel to the magnet, toward the object selected. It will sometimes seem as if you were being moved to it even against your own will—and as if someone else were actually moving your feet for you. Sometimes the impulse will come so strong that you will actually rush ahead of the projector, dragging him along with you, instead of having him a little in advance, or by your side. It is all a matter of practice.

You will soon discover the great difference between different projectors. Some of them will be in perfect en rapport condition with you, while others will fail to get into tune with you. Some projectors do not seem to know what is required of them, and usually forget to "will" you to the object. It helps sometimes to tell them that the whole thing depends upon their will power, and that the stronger their will is, the easier it is for you to find the thing. This puts them on their mettle, and makes them use their will more vigorously.

You will soon learn to recognize that peculiar feeling of "all right," that comes when you finally stand in front of the desired object. Then you begin to move your right hand up and down and around, until you get the right "feel" about that also, when you should place your hand on the place which seems to attract you most. You will find that the hand is just as responsive to the mental force, as are the feet. You will soon learn to distinguish between the mental signals: "up," "down," "to the right," "to the left," "stop now, you're right," etc. I cannot tell you just the difference—you must learn to "feel" them, and you will soon become expert in this. It is like learning to skate, run an automobile, operate a typewriter or anything else—all a matter of exercise and practice. But it is astonishing how rapidly one may learn; and how, at times, one seems to progress by great leaps and bounds. Now I shall give you the different stages or steps, which you will do well to follow in your exercises, progressing from the more simple to the more complex—but be sure to thoroughly master the simple ones, before you pass on to the more complex one. Be honest and strict with yourself—make yourself "pass the examination" before promotion, in each and every step.

1. LOCATIONS. Begin by finding particular locations in a room; corners, alcoves, doors, etc.

2. LARGE OBJECTS. Then begin to find large objects, such as tables, chairs, book-cases, etc.

3. SMALL OBJECTS. Then proceed to find small objects, such as books on a table, sofa-cushions, ornaments, paper-knives, etc. Gradually work down to very small objects, such as scarf-pins, articles of jewelry, pocket-knives, etc.

4. CONCEALED OBJECTS. Then proceed to find small objects that have been concealed under other objects, such as a pocket-book beneath a sofa-cushion, etc.; or a key in a book; or a key under a rug, etc.

5. MINUTE OBJECTS. Then proceed to discover very small objects, either concealed or else placed in an inconspicuous place, such as a pin stuck in the wall, etc.; or a small bean under a vase, etc.

The public performers of mind reading vary the above by sensational combinations, but you will readily see that these are but ingenious arrangements of the above general experiments, and that no new principle is involved. As these lessons are designed for serious study and experiment, and not for sensational public performances, I shall not enter into this phase of the subject in these pages. The student who understands the general principles, and is able to perform the above experiments successfully, will have no difficulty in reproducing the genuine feats of the public mind readers, by simply using his ingenuity in arranging the stage-effects, etc. Among other things, he will find that he will be able to obtain results by interposing a third person between the projector and himself; or by using a short piece of wire to connect himself and the projector. Drawing pictures on a blackboard, or writing out names on a slate, by means of thought direction, are simply the result of a fine development of the power of finding the small article—the impulse to move the hand in a certain direction comes in precisely the same way. The public driving feats of the professional mind-reader are but a more complicated form of the same general principle—the impression of "direction" once obtained, the rest is a mere matter of detail. The opening of the combination of a safe, though requiring wonderful proficiency on the part of the operator, is simply an elaboration of the "direction" movement.

Some recipients are, of course, far more proficient than are others; but each and every person—any person of average intelligence—will be able to secure more or less proficiency in these experiments, provided that patience and practice are employed. There is no such thing as an absolute failure possible to anyone who will proceed intelligently, and will practice sufficiently. Sometimes, after many discouraging attempts, the whole thing will flash into one's mind at once, and after that there will be little or no trouble. If you are able to witness the demonstrations of some good mind-reader, professional or amateurs it will help you to "catch the knack" at once.

You will find that these experiments will tend to greatly and rapidly develop your psychic receptivity in the direction of the higher phases of psychic phenomena. You will be surprised to find yourself catching flashes or glimpses of ^higher telepathy, or even clairvoyance. I would advise every person wishing to cultivate the higher psychic faculties, to begin by perfecting himself or herself in these simpler forms of mind-reading. Besides the benefits obtained, the practice proves very interesting, and opens many doors to pleasant social entertainment. But, never allow the desire for social praise or popularity, in these matters, to spoil you for serious investigation and experiment.

THE SECOND STEP OF DEVELOPMENT. The student, having perfected himself in the experiments along the lines of the first class of mind-reading, viz., where there is no actual physical contact between the projector and recipient, but where there is a close relation in space between the two.

Now, the thoughtful student will naturally wish to ask a question here, something like this: "You have told us that there is no real difference between telepathy at a great distance, and that in which there is only the slightest difference in the position of the projector and recipient, providing, always, that there is no actual physical contact. This being so, why your insistence upon the 'close relation in space' just mentioned?—what is the reason for this nearness?" Well, it is like this: While there is no distinction of space in true telepathy, still in experiments such as I shall now describe, the physical nearness of the projector enables him to concentrate more forcibly, and also gives confidence to the new beginner in receiving mind-currents. The benefit is solely that of the psychological effect upon the minds of the two persons, and has nothing to do with the actual power of the telepathic waves. It is much easier for a person to concentrate his thought and will upon a person in actual physical sight before him, than upon one out of sight. And, likewise, the recipient finds himself more confident and at ease when in the actual physical of the person sending the thoughts and will power. That is all there is to it. When the persons have acquired familiarity with projecting and receiving, then this obstacle is overcome, and long distances have no terror for them.

The best way for the student to start in on this class of mind-reading, is for him to experiment occasionally while performing his physical contact mind-reading experiments. For instance, while engaged in searching for an object let him disengage his hand from that of the projector for a moment or so, and then endeavor to receive the impressions without contact. (This should be done only in private experiments, not in public ones.) He will soon discover that he is receiving thought impulses in spite of the lack of physical contact—faint, perhaps, but still perceptible. A little practice of this kind will soon convince him that he is receiving the mental currents direct from brain to brain. This effect will be increased if he arranges to have several persons concentrate their thoughts and will power upon him during the experiment. From this stage, he will gradually develop into the stage of the Willing Game.

The Willing Game, quite popular in some circles, is played by one person (usually blind-folded) being brought into the room in which a number of persons have previously agreed upon some object to be found by him, they concentrating their thought firmly upon the object. The audience should be taught to not only to think but also to actively "will" the progress of the recipient from the start to the finish of the hunt. They should "will" him along each step of his journey, and then "will" his hand to the object itself wherever it be hidden.

An adept in the receiving end of the Willing Game will be able to perform all the experiments that I have just pointed out to you in the contact mind-reading class. In the Willing Game, you must remember that there is no taking hold of hands or any other form of physical contact between projector and recipient. The transmission of the mental currents must be direct, from brain to brain. Otherwise, the two classes of experiments are almost identical. There is the same "willing" toward the object on the part of the projectors, and the same passive obedience of the recipient. All the difference is that the current now passes over the ether of space, as in the case of the wireless message, instead of over the wires of the nervous system of the two persons.

The next step is that of "guessing" the name of things thought of by the party. I can give you no better directions than those followed by the investigators in the Creery children, as related in a preceding chapter of this book. When you become sufficiently proficient in this class of mind-reading, you should be able to reproduce every experiment there mentioned, with at least a fair degree of success. It is all a matter of patience, perseverance and practice.

After you have become very proficient in this class of experiments, you may begin to try experiments at "long distance," that is where the projector is out of your physical presence. It makes no difference whether the distance be merely that between two adjoining rooms, or else of miles of space. At first, however, nearness adds confidence in the majority of cases. Confidence once gained, the distance may be lengthened indefinitely, without impairing the success of the experiments. The long distance experiments may consist either of the receiving of single words, names, etc., or else distinct, clear messages or ideas. Some find it no more difficult to reproduce simile geometrical designs, such as circles, squares, triangles, etc., than to reproduce words or ideas.

In long distance experiments, it is well for the projector to write down the word or thought he wishes to transmit, and for the recipient to write down the impressions he receives. These memoranda will serve as a record of progress, and will, moreover, give a scientific value to the experiments.

Some experimenters have been quite successful in experiments along the lines of Automatic Writing from living persons, produced by means of long distance telepathy. In these cases the recipient sits passively at the hour agreed upon for the experiment, and the projector concentrates intently upon a sentence, or several sentences, one word at a time—at the same time "willing" the other person to write the word. The famous investigator of psychic phenomena, the late W.T. Stead, editor of a London newspaper, who went down on the "Titanic," was very successful in experiments of this kind. His written records of these are very interesting and instructive.

You will, of course, understand that in all cases of long distance telepathic experiments there should be an understanding between the two persons regarding the time and duration of the experiment, so as to obtain the best results. Personally, however, I have known of some very excellent results in which the receiving of the message occurred several hours after the sending—thus showing that telepathy is in a measure independent of time, as well as of space. But, as a rule, the best results are obtained when the two persons "sit" simultaneously.

Do not rest content with accepting the reports of others regarding these things. Try them for yourself. You will open up a wonderful world of new experiences for yourself. But, remember always, you must proceed step by step, perfecting yourself at each step before proceeding to the next.

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 09:20 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 12/09/08 09:28 AM


I tried it as an experiment with a person I was involved with. It was done without their consent. I wanted to plant some of my ideas into his brain. This was a subliminal suggestion (hypnotism) via telepathy.

He was asleep on my couch. I laid across his chest and with all the emotion I could muster, I sent my thoughts into him.

It worked in that his head was filled with my thoughts and my way of thinking, but as all hypnotism, it was only temporary.

The way I knew it worked is because about three days later I noticed him looking at me very suspiciously. He would shake his head as if he were trying to shake out my thoughts.

Then it was confirmed when he finally asked me, "What did you do?" I did not know what he was talking about and I told him so. (I did not know if it had worked.)

He then told me that he had been thinking "like me" for the past three days and he did not want to think like me. I asked him what he meant by that, and he said that all of my ideas about things were in his head and he was not comfortable with them. He did not agree with them. He was trying to shake them out of his head.

I was really amazed as I did not know it could work. It did not take long for him to shed this covert hypnotic brainwashing, but I then knew that I had transferred my ideas and thoughts to him.

I was young and foolish. I never tried anything like that again, as it is silly and only temporary.... but damn!

The thing that I think really helped drive (transfer) the thoughts was the emotion behind them.

jb




Very interesting Jeannie. I would say that what you did can only be explained on how you did it with yourself. I guess one has to have strong emotions to enter a mind, or maybe the ability to somehow extract waves into the mind to be able to transfer the thoughts somehow. You have a gift. It is to bad you didn't continue to practice this more often even when you was young. I don't know anyone who can do this at all, so that is amazing.



It is not a "gift." I believe we all do it all the time, we are just not aware of it. I had no idea if it would work or not. I was just trying it out.

I think strong emotions are very important in all things of this nature and important in magick and manifesting your reality too.

Thoughts are like radio waves, they can be sent through the air from a sender to a receiver, or picked up out of the air randomly.

If you are sending thoughts to a person who does not know it, it is best to catch them when they are asleep. I think that is one of the reasons my covert hypnotic suggestions worked on this occasion. laugh :tongue:

It is similar to the casting of a love spell. The spell caster just sends sensual visions to the sleeping person who wakes up and finds that for a few days he can't get you out of his mind. I have never done this, but it would tend to work the same way.

A man might fall prey to such a thing and he may take action towards this feeling before he stops to consider the consequences of his actions.

Of course this does not happen a lot. But the way to tell if you are smitten or if someone has cast a love spell on you is that you realize that under normal circumstances you would not have been attracted to this person or be thinking about them.

Another way is that your true self can't stand this person and you are seeing and thinking about them in sensual ways that are really unappealing to you. It is like these thoughts and visions are not yours at all.






no photo
Tue 12/09/08 05:14 PM
LESSON VI
CLAIRVOYANT PSYCHOMETRY

What Clairvoyance really is; and what it is not. The faculty of acquiring super-normal knowledge of facts and happening at a distance, or in past or future time, independent of the ordinary senses, and independent of telepathic reading of the minds of others. The different kinds of Clairvoyance described. What is Psychometry? Clairvoyant en rapport relations on the astral plane, with distant, past or future happenings and events; by means of a connecting material link. How to obtain the psychic affinity or astral relation to other things by means of a bit of stone, lock of hair, article of wearing apparel, etc. Interesting instances of clairvoyant psychometry. How to go about the work of psychometrizing. How to develop the power. How to secure the best conditions; and what to do when you have obtained them. Psychometry develops the occultist for still higher clairvoyant powers.

See Next post for this chapter...

no photo
Tue 12/09/08 05:15 PM
CLAIRVOYANT PSYCHOMETRY.



The word "clairvoyance" means "clear seeing." In its present usage it covers a wide field of psychic phenomena; and is used by different writers to designate phases of psychic phenomena differing widely from each other. The student is apt to become confused when he meets these apparently conflicting definitions and usages. In the glossary of the Society for Psychical Research, the term is defined as: "The faculty or act of perceiving, as though visually, with some coincidental truth, some distant scene; it is used sometimes, but hardly properly, for transcendental vision, or the perception of beings regarded as on another plane of existence."

Mrs. Henry Sidgwick, a distinguished writer on the subject of psychic phenomena, in one of her reports to the Society for Psychical Research, says: "The word clairvoyant is often used very loosely and with widely different meanings. I denote by it a faculty of acquiring supernormally, but not by reading the minds of persons present, a knowledge of facts such as we normally acquire by the use of our senses. I do not limit it to knowledge that would normally be acquired by the sense of sight, nor do I limit it to a knowledge of present facts. A similar knowledge of the past, and if necessary, of future facts may be included. On the other hand, I exclude the mere faculty of seeing apparitions or visions, which is sometimes called clairvoyance."

The above definitive explanation of the term clairvoyance agrees with the idea of the best authorities, and distinguishes between the phenomena of clairvoyance and that of telepathy, on the one hand; and between the former and that of seeing apparitions, on the other hand. I, personally, accept this distinction as both scientific in form, and as agreeing with the facts of the case. You will, of course, see that the acceptance of the existence of the astral senses throws light on many obscure points about which the psychic researchers are in doubt, and reconciles many apparently opposing facts.

All scientific authorities, as well as the best occultists, divide the phenomena of clairvoyance into several well-distinguished classes. The following classification is simple, and indicates clearly the principal forms of clairvoyant phenomena:

(1) Simple Clairvoyance, in which the clairvoyant person merely senses the auric emanations of other persons, such as the auric vibrations, colors, etc.; currents of thought-vibrations, etc.; but does not see events or scenes removed in space or time from the observer.

(2) Clairvoyance in Space, in which the clairvoyant person senses scenes and events removed in space from the observer; and, often also is able to sense such things even when they are concealed or obscured by intervening material objects.

(3) Clairvoyance in Time, in which the clairvoyant person senses scenes and events which have had their original place in past time; or scenes and events which will have their original place in the future.

I shall describe each of these three classes, with their many variations, as we reach them in their proper places in these lessons. Before doing so however, I wish to explain to you the several methods by which clairvoyant vision is usually induced. These methods may be designated as follows:

(1) Psychometry, or the method of getting en rapport with the astral plane by means of some physical object connected with the person, thing, or scene about which you desire to be informed.

(2) Crystal Gazing, etc., or the method of getting en rapport with the astral plane by means of gazing into a crystal, magic mirror, etc.

(3) Clairvoyant Reverie, or the method of getting en rapport with the astral plane by means of psychic states in which the sights, sounds and thoughts of the material and physical plane are shut out of consciousness.

I shall now proceed to give the details regarding each one of these three great classes of methods inducing clairvoyant vision, or en rapport conditions with the astral plane.

Psychometry. Psychometry is that form of clairvoyant phenomena in which the clairvoyant gets into en rapport relation with the astral plane by means of the connecting link of material objects, such as bit of stone, piece of hair, article of wearing apparel etc., which has had previous associations with the thing, person or scene regarding which clairvoyant vision is required.

Without going into technical occult explanations, I would say that the virtue of these articles consists entirely of their associative value. That is to say, they carry in them certain vibrations of past experience which serve as a connecting link, or associated filament, with the thing which is sought to be brought into the field of clairvoyant vision.

To reach clairvoyantly a thing, scene, or person in this way is akin to the unwinding of a ball of yarn, when you hold the loose end in your hand. Or, it is like giving a keen-scented dog a sniff at a handkerchief once carried by the person whom you wish him to nose out for you.

A well-known authority on the subject of psychic phenomena has said on this point: "The untrained clairvoyant usually cannot find any particular astral picture when it is wanted, without some special link to put him en rapport with the subject required. Psychometry is an instance in point. It seems as though there were a sort of magnetic attachment or affinity between any particle of matter and the record which contains its history—an affinity which enables it to act as a kind of conductor between that record and the faculties of anyone who can read it. For instance, I once brought from Stonehenge a tiny fragment of stone, not larger than a pin's head, and on putting this into an envelope and handing it to a psychometer who had no idea what it was, she at once began to describe that wonderful ruin and the desolate country surrounding it, and then went on to picture vividly what were evidently scenes from its early history, showing that the infinitessimal fragment had been sufficient to put her into communication with the records connected with the spot from which it came. The scenes through which we pass in the course of our life seem to act in the same way upon the cells of our brain as did the history of Stonehenge upon that particle of stone. They establish a connection with those cells by means of which our mind is put en rapport with that particular portion of the records, and so we 'remember' what we have seen."

One of the simplest and most common form of psychometry is that in which the psychometrist is able to tell the physical condition of a person by means of holding to the forehead, or even in the hand, some trinket or small article such as a handkerchief recently worn on the person of the individual regarding whom the information is sought. In the case of some very sensitive psychometrists, the psychic person "takes on" the condition of the other person whose former article of clothing, trinket, etc., she is holding. She will often actually experience the physical pain and distress of the person, and will be able to indicate from what ailment the person is suffering. Some persons attain great proficiency in this direction, and are a great assistance to wise physicians who avail themselves of their services. Some successful physicians themselves possess this faculty well developed, and use it to great advantage, though, as a rule they keep very quiet about it, from fear of creating unfavorable comment from their fellow-physicians and from the general public who "do not believe in such tom-foolery."

A step further is the power of some psychometrists to correctly describe the personal characteristics, and even the past history of persons with whom they come in contact, or whose "associated article" they have in their hands. Some very remarkable instances of this phase of psychometry are related in the books containing the history of clairvoyance. An interesting case is that related by Zschokke, the eminent German writer, who relates in his autobiography his wonderful experience in this direction. Listen to the story in his own words: "It has happened to me occasionally at the first meeting with a total stranger, when I have been listening in silence to his conversation, that his past life up to the present moment, with many minute circumstances belonging to one or other particular scene in it, has come across me like a dream, but distinctly, entirely involuntarily and unsought, occupying in duration a few minutes. For a long time I was disposed to consider these fleeting visions as a trick of the fancy—the more so as my dream-vision displayed to me the dress and movements of the actors, the appearance of the room, the furniture, and other accidents of the scene; till on one occasion, in a gamesome mood, I narrated to my family the secret history of a seamstress who had just quitted the room. I had never seen the person before. Nevertheless, the hearers were astonished, and laughed and would not be persuaded but that I had a previous acquaintance with the former life of the person, inasmuch as what I had stated was perfectly true.

"I was not less astonished to find that my dream vision agreed with reality. I then gave more attention to the subject, and as often as propriety allowed of it, I related to those whose lives had so passed before me the substance of my dream-vision, to obtain from them its contradiction or confirmation. On every occasion its confirmation followed, not without amazement on the part of those who gave it. On a certain fair-day I went into the town of Waldshut accompanied by two young foresters, who are still alive. It was evening, and, tired with our walk, we went into an inn called the 'Vine.' We took our supper with a numerous company at the public table, when it happened that they made themselves merry over the peculiarities of the Swiss in connection with the belief in mesmerism, Lavater's physiognomical system, and the like. One of my companions, whose national pride was touched by their raillery, begged me to make some reply, particularly in answer to a young man of superior appearance who sat opposite, and had indulged in unrestrained ridicule.

"It happened that the events of this person's life had just previously passed before my mind. I turned to him with the question whether he would reply to me with truth and candor, if I narrated to him the most secret passages of his history, he being as little known to me as I to him. That would, I suggested, go something beyond Lavater's physiognomical skill. He promised that if I told the truth he would admit it openly. Then I narrated the events with which my dream vision had furnished me, and the table learned the history of the young tradesman's life, of his school years, his peccadilloes, and finally, of a little act of roguery committed by him on the strongbox of his employer. I described the uninhabited room with its white walls, where to the right of the brown door there had stood upon the table the small money-chest, etc. The man, much struck, admitted the correctness of each circumstance—even, which I could not expect, of the last."

The above incident is typical of this class of psychometry, and many persons have had at least flashes of this phase of the power. The only remarkable thing about this particular case is its faithfulness regarding details—this shows a very fine development of the astral sense. The feature that makes it psychometric, instead of pure clairvoyance, is that the presence of the other person was necessary to produce the phenomenon—a bit of clothing would probably have answered as well. Zschokke does not seem to have been able to manifest time-clairvoyance independent of the presence of the person concerned—he needs the associated link, or loose end of the psychic ball of yarn.

Next in order in the list of the phenomena of psychometry is that in which the psychometrist is able to describe a distant scene by means of a bit of mineral, plant, or similar object, once located at that place. In such cases, the psychometrist gets en rapport with the distant scene by means of the connecting link mentioned. Having obtained this, he is able to relate the events that are happening on that scene at that particular moment. Some very interesting cases are mentioned in which the psychometrist has been able to "spy" in on a certain place, by means of some small article which has recently been located in that place. For instance I once gave a young psychometrist a penholder from the office of a lawyer, a friend of mine, located about eight hundred miles from the psychometrist. She gave a perfect picture of the interior of the office, the scene across the street visible from the office window, and certain events that were happening in the office at that moment, which were verified by careful inquiry as to persons and time. Every occultist, or investigator of psychic phenomena has experienced many cases of this kind.

Another phase of psychometry is that in which the psychometer is able to sense the conditions existing underground, by means of a piece of mineral or metal which originally was located there. Some wonderful instances of phychometric discernment of mines, etc., have been recorded. In this phase of psychometry, all that is needed is a piece of the coal, mineral or metal which has come from the mine. Following up this psychic "lead" the psychometrist is able to describe the veins or strata of the surrounding land, although they have not yet been uncovered or discovered.

Still another form of psychometric discernment is that in which the psychometrist gets en rapport with the past history of an object, or of its surroundings, by means of the object itself. In this way, the psychometrist holding in his hand, or pressing to his head, a bullet from a battle field, is able to picture the battle itself. Or, given a piece of ancient pottery or stone implement, the psychometrist is able to picture the time and peoples connected with the object in the past—sometimes after many centuries are past. I once handed a good psychometrist a bit of ornament taken from an Egyptian mummy over three thousand years old. Though the psychometrist did not know what the object was, or from whence it had come, she was able to picture not only the scenes in which the Egyptian had lived, but also the scenes connected with the manufacture of the ornament, some three hundred years before that time—for it turned out that the ornament itself was an antique when the Egyptian had acquired it. In another case, I had the psychometrist describe in detail the animal life, and the physical phenomena, of the age in which a fossil had existed when alive—many thousands of years ago. In the proper place in this book, I will explain just how it is possible to penetrate the secrets of the past by psychometric vision—that is to say, the psychic laws making the same possible.

Some of the most remarkable of recorded instances of this form of psychometry known to the Western world are those related in the works of a geologist named Denton, who some fifty years ago conducted a series of investigations into the phenomena of psychometry. His recorded experiments fill several volumes. Being a geologist, he was able to select the best subjects for the experiments, and also to verify and decide upon the accuracy of the reports given by the psychometrists. His wife, herself, was a gifted psychometrist, and it has been said of her, by good authority, that "she is able, by putting a piece of matter (whatever be its nature) to her head, to see, either with her eyes closed or open, all that the piece of matter, figuratively speaking, ever saw, heard, or experienced." The following examples will give a good idea of the Denton experiments, which are typical of this class of psychometry.

Dr. Denton gave the psychometrist a small fragment broken from a large meteorite. She held it to her head, and reported: "This is curious. There is nothing at all to be seen. I feel as if I were in the air. No, not in the air either, but in nothing, no place. I am utterly unable to describe it; it seems high, however I feel as though I were rising, and my eyes are carried upwards; but I look around in vain; there is nothing to be seen. I see clouds, now, but nothing else. They are so close to me that I seem to be in them. My head, and neck and eyes are affected. My eyes are carried up, and I cannot roll them down. Now the clouds appear lighter and lighter, and look as though the sunlight would burst through them. As the clouds separate, I can see a star or two, and then the moon instead of the sun. The moon seems near, and looks coarse and rough, and paler and larger in size than I ever saw it before. What a strange feeling comes over me! It appears as if I were going right to the moon, and it looks as if the moon were coming to me. It affects me terribly."

Dr. Denton adds: "She was too much affected to continue the experiment longer. Had this aerolite at some period of its history, come within the sphere of the moon's attraction, and had its velocity so increased that its augmented centrifugal force had carried it off into space again, whence, drawn by the superior attractive force of the earth, it had fallen and ended its career forever?"

At another time, Dr. Denton tested the psychometrist with a whalebone walking cane. She supposed it to be wood, but when she began to report her psychic impressions, they came as follows: "I feel as though I were a monster. There is nothing of a tree about it, and it is useless for me to go further. I feel like vomiting. Now I want to plunge into the water. I believe that I am going to have a fit. My jaws are large enough to take down a house at a gulp. I now know what this is—it is whalebone. I see the inside of the whale's mouth. It has no teeth. It has a slimy look, but I only get a glimpse of it. Now, I see the whole animal. What an awful looking creature."

Another time, Dr. Denton gave the psychometrist a minute piece of the enamel of the tooth of a mastodon, which had been found thirty feet below the surface of the earth. The psychometrist had not the slightest knowledge of the character of the tiny flake of enamel handed her, but nevertheless reported: "My impression is that it is a part of some monstrous animal, probably part of a tooth. I feel like a perfect monster, with heavy legs, unwieldy head, and very large body. I go down to a shallow stream to drink. I can hardly speak, my jaws are so heavy. I feel like getting down on all fours. What a noise comes through the woods. I have an impulse to answer it. My ears are very large and leathery, and I can almost fancy they flap in my face as I move my head. There are some older ones than I. It seems so out of keeping to be talking with these heavy jaws. They are dark brown, as if they had been completely tanned. There is one old fellow, with large tusks, that looks very tough. I see several younger ones. In fact, there is a whole herd. My upper lip moves curiously; I can flap it up. It seems strange to me how it is done. There is a plant growing here, higher than my head. It is nearly as thick as my wrist, very juicy, sweet, and tender—something like green corn in taste, but sweeter. It is not the taste it would have to a human being—oh no! it is sickenish, and very unpleasant to the human taste." These instances might be multiplied indefinitely, but the principle is the same in each. In my own experience, I gave a small piece from the Great Pyramid of Egypt to a psychometrist who was uneducated and who knew nothing of ancient Egypt or its history. Notwithstanding this, she gave me such a detailed and complete account of the life of ancient Egypt, which was in such complete accordance with the opinions of the best authorities, that I would hesitate about publishing the report, for it certainly would be regarded as rank imposture by the average scientific authority. Some day, however, I may publish this.

There are no special directions to be given the student in psychometry. All that can be done is to suggest that each person should try the experiments for himself, in order to find out whether he has, or has not, the psychometric faculty. It may be developed by the methods that will be given to develop all psychic powers, in another part of this book. But much will depend upon actual practice and exercise. Take strange objects, and, sitting in a quiet room with the object held to your forehead, shut out all thoughts of the outside world, and forget all personal affairs. In a short time, if the conditions are all right, you will begin to have flashes of scenes connected with the history of the object. At first rather disconnected and more or less confused, there will soon come to you a clearing away of the scene, and the pictures will become quite plain. Practice will develop the power. Practice only when alone, or when in the presence of some sympathetic friend or friends. Always avoid discordant and inharmonious company when practicing psychic powers. The best psychometrists usually keep the physical eyes closed when practicing their power.

You have doubtless heard the sensing of sealed letters spoken of as clairvoyance. But this is merely one form of psychometry. The letter is a very good connecting medium in psychometric experiments. I advise you to begin your experiments with old letters. You will be surprised to discover how readily you will begin to receive psychic impressions from the letters, either from the person who wrote them, or from the place in which they were written, or from some one connected with the subsequent history. One of the most interesting experiments I ever witnessed in psychometry, was a case in which a letter that had been forwarded from place to place, until it had gone completely around the globe, was psychometrized by a young Hindu maiden. Although ignorant of the outside world, she was able to picture the people and scenery of every part of the globe in which the letter had traveled. Her report was really an interesting "travelogue" of a trip around the world, given in tabloid form. You may obtain some interesting results in psychometrizing old letters—but always be conscientious about it, and refrain from divulging the secrets that will become yours in the course of these experiments. Be honorable on the astral plane, as well as on the physical—more so, rather than less.

no photo
Wed 12/10/08 09:04 AM

LESSON V
MIND-READING, AND BEYOND


What "Mind-Reading" is. The two phases of Mind-Reading. Mind-Reading with physical contact; and without physical contact. Why the scientific investigators make the distinction. Why science has been over-cautious; and how it falls short of the full understanding of contact Mind-Reading. How the thought-waves flow along the nerves of the projector and recipient. Like telegraphy over wires, as compared with the wireless method. How to learn by actual experience, and not alone by reading books. How to experiment for yourself; and how to obtain the best results in Mind-Reading. The working principles of Mind-Reading stated. Full directions and instruction given for the successful performance of the interesting feats. This lesson is really a little manual of practical instruction in Mind-Reading, and the higher phases of Thought-Transference. The person carefully studying and applying the principles taught therein should become very proficient in both private and public manifestations.

Continuted in Next post.....


Now we are talking Jeannie! Mind Reading would be very interesting to learn if it is possible:smile:

no photo
Wed 12/10/08 09:09 AM
It says:

So, I shall now give you advice and instructions concerning actual experimental work.

You, the student, should begin by making yourself a good recipient—that is a good "mind reader," allowing others to play the part of projector. Later on, you may play the part of projector, if you so desire, but the real "fine work" is done by the recipient, and, for that reason that is the part you should learn to play by frequent rehearsals.

I advise you to begin your experiments with friends who are in sympathy with you, and who are interested in the subject. Avoid particularly all early experiments with uncongenial or unsympathetic persons; and avoid as you would a pestilence all those who are antagonistic either to yourself or to the general subject of telepathy and kindred subjects. As you must make yourself especially "sensitive" in order to successfully conduct a mind-reading test, you will find yourself particularly susceptible to the mental attitude of those around you at such times, and therefore should surround yourself only with those who are congenial and sympathetic.

-----------------------------

I will try this with my wife and see what happenslaugh

no photo
Wed 12/10/08 09:13 AM
It says:

An adept in the receiving end of the Willing Game will be able to perform all the experiments that I have just pointed out to you in the contact mind-reading class. In the Willing Game, you must remember that there is no taking hold of hands or any other form of physical contact between projector and recipient. The transmission of the mental currents must be direct, from brain to brain. Otherwise, the two classes of experiments are almost identical. There is the same "willing" toward the object on the part of the projectors, and the same passive obedience of the recipient. All the difference is that the current now passes over the ether of space, as in the case of the wireless message, instead of over the wires of the nervous system of the two persons.

The next step is that of "guessing" the name of things thought of by the party. I can give you no better directions than those followed by the investigators in the Creery children, as related in a preceding chapter of this book. When you become sufficiently proficient in this class of mind-reading, you should be able to reproduce every experiment there mentioned, with at least a fair degree of success. It is all a matter of patience, perseverance and practice.


------------------------------

How do you know you are using frequencies? Are we guessing for randomness? Is there a way to know you are transmitting a vibration so to say to receive a image of what the other person is thinking or holding that I can't see. Gosh I wish there was a better way of understanding this.

no photo
Wed 12/10/08 09:14 AM
It says:

I advise you to begin your experiments with friends who are in sympathy with you, and who are interested in the subject. Avoid particularly all early experiments with uncongenial or unsympathetic persons; and avoid as you would a pestilence all those who are antagonistic either to yourself or to the general subject of telepathy and kindred subjects. As you must make yourself especially "sensitive" in order to successfully conduct a mind-reading test, you will find yourself particularly susceptible to the mental attitude of those around you at such times, and therefore should surround yourself only with those who are congenial and sympathetic.

----------------------------------------------

okay sincerity is important that is true. If one takes it as a joke then nothing will happen. I agree with this. Also positive thinking and believing it can happen. Everyone has to agree with this in order to make this experiment work.