| Topic: obama appointee gun question | |
|---|---|
|
President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team is asking potential appointees detailed questions about gun ownership,
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081120/pl_politico/15835 ------------------------------- well is he gonna try to take them did he not say he would not hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
|
|
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team is asking potential appointees detailed questions about gun ownership, http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081120/pl_politico/15835 ------------------------------- well is he gonna try to take them did he not say he would not hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Rush used to say...in regards to Clinton... ..." don't listen to what he says...watch what he does "...just apply this to Obama... |
|
|
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
bush was for stopping terrorist attacks in the united states so yer saying you are for terrorist attacks in the united states ----- interesting very interesting |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Fri 11/21/08 11:30 AM
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
bush was for stopping terrorist attacks in the united states so yer saying you are for terrorist attacks in the united states ----- interesting very interesting He didnt stop 9/11 He ran and hid. Just like he ran and hid from his National Guard duty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Fri 11/21/08 11:29 AM
|
|
Im not sure how asking an appointee if they owned a gun relates to gun rights.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
bush was for stopping terrorist attacks in the united states so yer saying you are for terrorist attacks in the united states ----- interesting very interesting when is he gonna stop the war thats BEEN over for a long time now? |
|
|
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
bush was for stopping terrorist attacks in the united states so yer saying you are for terrorist attacks in the united states ----- interesting very interesting He didnt stop 9/11
no he did not and you think that all the planning and training to pull that of was completed in 9 months (that was a clinton miss as well) besides that is not the issue at hand whether he stopped it does not change his (Whatever Bush was for) stance and you said (Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite) so according to that statement then you are for terrorism not rocket science to read that statement i doubt you really are for terrorism --but you said it not me |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Fri 11/21/08 11:40 AM
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
bush was for stopping terrorist attacks in the united states so yer saying you are for terrorist attacks in the united states ----- interesting very interesting He didnt stop 9/11
no he did not and you think that all the planning and training to pull that of was completed in 9 months (that was a clinton miss as well) besides that is not the issue at hand whether he stopped it does not change his (Whatever Bush was for) stance and you said (Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite) so according to that statement then you are for terrorism not rocket science to read that statement i doubt you really are for terrorism --but you said it not me I think Bush was for terrorism. It got him a lot of power. It got him reelected. It got his party a lot of power. They used it for all it was worth. Im not sure they kept anybody safe from anything. I have not seen any evidence of any of their policies doing anything but give the terrorists what they want. Taking away my rights is not what I consider "keeping me safe". Im not sure how giving the terrorists what they want is "keeping us safe". And terrorist is a subjective term. Who determines what a terrorist is? Every country calls their enemies terrorists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the one that should keep you safe is yourself first
so in comes the second amendment if obama fills the executive branch with anti gun people (more chance you are anti-gun if you do not own one) he would have more power to fight arms ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
the one that should keep you safe is yourself first so in comes the second amendment if obama fills the executive branch with anti gun people (more chance you are anti-gun if you do not own one) he would have more power to fight arms ownership Yeah yeah. I lived thru this stuff in the Clinton years and I still have all the same guns that I had then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the one that should keep you safe is yourself first so in comes the second amendment if obama fills the executive branch with anti gun people (more chance you are anti-gun if you do not own one) he would have more power to fight arms ownership Yeah yeah. I lived thru this stuff in the Clinton years and I still have all the same guns that I had then.
probably because you lived through this stuff then and all i did was ask i did not say he was or was not just because one points out the obvious circumstance does not a supporter nor a non-supporter make |
|
|
|
|
|
the one that should keep you safe is yourself first so in comes the second amendment if obama fills the executive branch with anti gun people (more chance you are anti-gun if you do not own one) he would have more power to fight arms ownership Yeah yeah. I lived thru this stuff in the Clinton years and I still have all the same guns that I had then.
probably because you lived through this stuff then and all i did was ask i did not say he was or was not just because one points out the obvious circumstance does not a supporter nor a non-supporter make Although some of our rhetoric in these political threads get a little sarcastic, I want to say that I respect and value your opinions DJ. I just wanted to let you know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
thank you mirror
and i know you like to tease and be sarcastic he11 thats what makes it fun i enjoy your post most of the time
|
|
|
|
|
|
President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team is asking potential appointees detailed questions about gun ownership, http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081120/pl_politico/15835 ------------------------------- well is he gonna try to take them did he not say he would not hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I am completely against just about any form of gun control. At this time we need them more than ever. Do not let them take our firearms away, at any cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
I think its a non-issue. I'll believe it when I see it
I'm not one to get all hysterical over something that "might" happen |
|
|
|
|
|
President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team is asking potential appointees detailed questions about gun ownership, http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081120/pl_politico/15835 ------------------------------- well is he gonna try to take them did he not say he would not hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Rush used to say...in regards to Clinton... ..." don't listen to what he says...watch what he does "...just apply this to Obama... What did he say in regards to Bush?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
cutelildevilsmom
on
Sun 11/23/08 07:00 AM
|
|
|
On the gun issue I still feel people should have to go through a gun handling and safety course unless military or law enforcement.They have required hunter safety courses,why not this?To many kids bringing weapons to school,guns unlocked,untrained people buying guns.What good is a gun if you don't know how to use it or store it properly?This would give added income to the states and I would breath better for sure.
Obama can't take your guns,the Supreme court ruled on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
gun safety classes should start in kindergarten
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Robin but they are so into non violence at school that they don't teach reality which is guns are out there .
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever Bush was for, I'm for the opposite.
He didnt stop 9/11
Im not sure how asking an appointee if they owned a gun relates to gun rights.
I think Bush was for terrorism.
Im not sure how giving the terrorists what they want is "keeping us safe".
Yeah yeah.
Although some of our rhetoric in these political threads get a little sarcastic, I want to say that I respect and value your opinions DJ.
