its all good, i just thought it was less of an "oabam is a muslim!" than is was an oh this is why people might think that. meh. lol

well considering she copied and pasted only to say thats WHY people said it i would have to go ahead and exonerate her.

You are right, not but for the facts what people are saying and doing when someone brings up a subject that is ,,,,,what,,,, too touchy to talk about?? I think sometimes that is exactly the reaction the O camp is putting out, so then if something a bit touchy comes up, people are hesitant to talk about it.
That is exactly why I put it up. Because it seems, if they question anything, it gets slammed instead of being a matter of fact.
Nothing wrong with O wearing stuff, but the fact that first, they try to say it is photo shop, and then a blogger proved it was not, they then tried to shame the Hillary champaign because she introduced it. What is the big deal? Photos of McCain's daughter wearing stuff didn't get the fake, lie and shame treatments.

We are being deprived of our freedom of speech and others are being shamed for saying what is on people's mind, or what the truth is.
It's an election, we should question, and talk freely about everything. Yet, Obama did say 'get in their faces" and does lead by example about 'not going there' when there is where his
own agenda is hidden. Using the race card to make others 'hate' when none but him is mudding the waters like that.
No one should be calling people names, hurting feelings or slamming people. Period, BB

Thanks, (and no, it was not pertaining to another thread, as stated by another). Peace, BB

You are right, not but for the facts what people are saying and doing when someone brings up a subject that is ,,,,,what,,,, too touchy to talk about?? I think sometimes that is exactly the reaction the O camp is putting out, so then if something a bit touchy comes up, people are hesitant to talk about it.
That is exactly why I put it up. Because it seems, if they question anything, it gets slammed instead of being a matter of fact.
Nothing wrong with O wearing stuff, but the fact that first, they try to say it is photo shop, and then a blogger proved it was not, they then tried to shame the Hillary champaign because she introduced it. What is the big deal? Photos of McCain's daughter wearing stuff didn't get the fake, lie and shame treatments.

We are being deprived of our freedom of speech and others are being shamed for saying what is on people's mind, or what the truth is.
It's an election, we should question, and talk freely about everything. Yet, Obama did say 'get in their faces" and does lead by example about 'not going there' when there is where his
own agenda is hidden. Using the race card to make others 'hate' when none but him is mudding the waters like that.
No one should be calling people names, hurting feelings or slamming people. Period, BB

Yes, it was pertaining to another thread that you keep copying and pasting on. We would rather communicate with you.

Thanks, (and no, it was not pertaining to another thread, as stated by another). Peace, BB

Thanks, really, me too. But you are wrong. NO where else on this (or any other site) did I copy or post about the 15 ft pic a man had in his yard, and that is what I am talking, responding to /about - here.

Also, to 'MirrorMirror', see, you are doing exactly what WE mean! You are putting something negative,

>>Its about (silly)falsehoods being spread about a decent man.<<

words into another's mouth. Not about that at all. Just that - well, covered before, and U push this out instead. Regards, BB

.
It's an election, we should question, and talk freely about everything. Yet, Obama did say 'get in their faces" and does lead by example about 'not going there' when there is where his
own agenda is hidden. Using the race card to make others 'hate' when none but him is mudding the waters like that.
No one should be calling people names, hurting feelings or slamming people. Period, BB

You are right, not but for the facts what people are saying and doing when someone brings up a subject that is ,,,,,what,,,, too touchy to talk about?? I think sometimes that is exactly the reaction the O camp is putting out, so then if something a bit touchy comes up, people are hesitant to talk about it.
That is exactly why I put it up. Because it seems, if they question anything, it gets slammed instead of being a matter of fact.
Nothing wrong with O wearing stuff, but the fact that first, they try to say it is photo shop, and then a blogger proved it was not, they then tried to shame the Hillary champaign because she introduced it. What is the big deal? Photos of McCain's daughter wearing stuff didn't get the fake, lie and shame treatments.

We are being deprived of our freedom of speech and others are being shamed for saying what is on people's mind, or what the truth is.
It's an election, we should question, and talk freely about everything. Yet, Obama did say 'get in their faces" and does lead by example about 'not going there' when there is where his
own agenda is hidden. Using the race card to make others 'hate' when none but him is mudding the waters like that.
No one should be calling people names, hurting feelings or slamming people. Period, BB

I agree but people shouldnt be posting propaganda without proof..Thats mudding the waters..This election for the first time in along time, Issues mater, facts matter..All the mudd slinging dosnt.. People are getting informed on what matters to them..Just because they dont agree with you dosnt make them less informed..What might be a high priority for you might not be for me..We all know what we have lived...

I agree but people shouldnt be posting propaganda without proof..Thats mudding the waters..This election for the first time in along time, Issues mater, facts matter..All the mudd slinging dosnt.. People are getting informed on what matters to them..Just because they dont agree with you dosnt make them less informed..What might be a high priority for you might not be for me..We all know what we have lived...

You are right, not but for the facts what people are saying and doing when someone brings up a subject that is ,,,,,what,,,, too touchy to talk about?? I think sometimes that is exactly the reaction the O camp is putting out, so then if something a bit touchy comes up, people are hesitant to talk about it.
That is exactly why I put it up. Because it seems, if they question anything, it gets slammed instead of being a matter of fact.
Nothing wrong with O wearing stuff, but the fact that first, they try to say it is photo shop, and then a blogger proved it was not, they then tried to shame the Hillary champaign because she introduced it. What is the big deal? Photos of McCain's daughter wearing stuff didn't get the fake, lie and shame treatments.

We are being deprived of our freedom of speech and others are being shamed for saying what is on people's mind, or what the truth is.
It's an election, we should question, and talk freely about everything. Yet, Obama did say 'get in their faces" and does lead by example about 'not going there' when there is where his
own agenda is hidden. Using the race card to make others 'hate' when none but him is mudding the waters like that.
No one should be calling people names, hurting feelings or slamming people. Period, BB

We are being deprived of the truth..Yet you fail to prove your accusations..

Sure, I agree w/U 100% but tell me, please, point to where I posted propaganda - just a response about a 15 ft sign in a yard, with the pics of the two in their youth on it.

U too, accuse me of mudding the waters, did not. Just a pic, and topic of why things are okay to speak of. No one needs to agree w/me, or you, they form their own opinions, sure doesn't make me mad, does it you?
Peace, BB

We are being deprived of the truth..Yet you fail to prove your accusations..

We are being deprived of the truth..Yet you fail to prove your accusations..

Yeah, you are seeing me. Some of these pics on here are out of this world (smile)BB