100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: debate structure | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
What does everyone think of the debate's decidedly adversarial and argumentative approach this time through? The candidates are being allowed to directly address each others' comments.
Personally I love it, but I still think that they should be required to cite their references for any claims of "fact" that they make. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
duckiegiggles
on
Fri 09/26/08 07:14 PM
|
|
What does everyone think of the debate's decidedly adversarial and argumentative approach this time through? The candidates are being allowed to directly address each others' comments. Personally I love it, but I still think that they should be required to cite their references for any claims of "fact" that they make. i hated it didnt want to watch it but thought it was the only thing on so i missed smackdown damn it  i dont think either one of them came out with any direct answers for the questions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, the fact that they respond directly (and sometimes even interrupt each other) allows them to clarify their direct points way more than their stump speeches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the format...they were able to answer eachother. It really cut out the media's bias in these debates.
McCain was not going to let OBAMA's lies stand...that's for sure. |
|
|
|
|
