Oh yea postions are being filled




HAPPY DANCE

Oh yea postions are being filled




HAPPY DANCE

Oh yea postions are being filled




HAPPY DANCE

Oh yea postions are being filled




HAPPY DANCE

Oh yea postions are being filled




HAPPY DANCE

Happy dance

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

grabs red and starts feeling the groove



OH YEA






I AM FEELING IT






HAPPY DANCE HAPPY DANCE

Attorney General Since pole dancer isn't an option) ,lol

Whoooooo hoooooooo


Pole dancer extraordinaire......and at the party



liz official pole dancer....gigglesnort.

Does that mean I cant be attorney general???

President Feralcatlady Debbie

Vice President Beachbum sam the man

Aide to the President Scott Kojack

Secretary of Defense Goofball Mitch

Department of the Treasury Shadow77 Kerry

Secretary of Labor bad_girl merle the pearl

Secretary of Health & Human Services adirtygirl Michell

Secretary of State Bry395

Department of Housing & Urban Development Tanya

Secretary of Education Singmesweet Emily

Attorney General/pole dancer ladyliz liz


Welcome Em and now our children have a fighting chance this position is soooooooo you........we want smart children.

Welcome Kojack aboard as the Presidential Aide....Welcome aboard Scott......

Welcome aboard Liz and thanks doll....party is going to rock.



Positions that need to be filled


Secretary of the Interior
Department of the Interior (1849):
Oversees national conservation efforts and is responsible for most of our nationally owned public lands, natural resources, and wildlife.

Secretary of Agriculture
Department of Agriculture (1862):
Ensures a safe, affordable, nutritious, and accessible food supply; cares for agriculture, forest, and range lands; supports the development of rural communities; and provides economic development for farmers and rural residents.

Secretary of Commerce
Department of Commerce (1903):
Promotes economic, business, and job opportunities for all Americans. It is responsible for all copyrights, patents, and trademarks. It also plays a major role in Federal government matters related to oceans, weather, and technology.

Secretary of Transportation
Department of Transportation (1966):
Ensures a fast, safe, efficient, accessible and convenient transportation system. This includes transportation of people and goods by car, plane, train, and ship. It is also responsible for maintaining the Federal highway system.

Secretary of Energy
Department of Energy (1977):
Researches and develops reliable energy systems that are friendly to the environment, but are not too expensive. It is also responsible for the Nation's nuclear energy and weapons technologies.


Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Department of Veterans Affairs (1988):
Acts as the principal advocate for veterans and their families ensuring that they receive medical care, benefits, social support, and lasting memorials recognizing their service.

Most would credit Lincoln with moral courage in his handling of the Civil War. More contentious cases could be made for Franklin Roosevelt's response to the Depression, for Reagan in his refusal to accept the inevitability of half the world living under Communism, and for Carter in his principled campaign for human rights in a political environment that normally only pays lip service to such things.

Whoever your personal political heroes, it is likely that you admire them in significant part because they risked doing the right thing instead of the safe thing.

Practical wisdom, as opposed to intelligence or knowledge, is necessary to respond helpfully to the many political problems that involve competing goods or "no good choices." The illegal immigration problem sets the reasonable need to control one's borders against the pragmatic fact of what to do about the millions of illegal immigrants already here. The response to terror in the world requires a balance between the goal (security, certainly, and perhaps the extension of democracy) and the means to reach that goal (wiretapping? torture?). The political system perhaps never "solves" these issues to everyone's satisfaction, but a leader needs the virtue of practical wisdom to move us forward.

No quality is more often invoked in contemporary political campaigns than justice—frequently under the umbrella of fairness. In fact we have trained citizens to present many of their demands in terms of what is fair and of injuries to fairness. The poor, the middle class, and the rich all contend that the tax system is not fair to them. Gays, women, and people of color each present themselves as victims of a society and political system that should, in the name of justice, offer them protection and redress.

It is self-evident that a President must care about justice, but what does that mean and what would it look like? We should assess the nature and intensity of candidates' commitment to justice and ask them to articulate both the foundations for their commitments and to give evidence that they have acted to make the world a fairer place.

Faith, Hope, Love—in a President?

Even those who acknowledge the relevance of the four classical virtues in evaluating presidential candidates might question the significance of the three biblical ones. And perhaps as virtues tied to a specific religious tradition they are potentially controversial. But to the extent that these too are universal qualities (as many social scientists and philosophers argue), they can be expressed in ways that both the religious and secular can affirm.

The ultimate expression of faith may be religious, but in nonsectarian terms it has to do with commitment to a larger story than one's individual life. Politically, faith is commitment to the story of America—its fundamental worth, its potential for good, its ability to heal its wounds. In this sense, both Martin Luther King—a prophetic critic—and Ronald Reagan—a vocal advocate—demonstrated great faith in America. The key issue in assessing this quality in a candidate is not whether they engage in happy talk about the country, but whether they are capable of calling people to have faith in its essential worth and to work to better realize that inherent possibility.

Ronald Reagan's famous slogan, "It's morning in America," expressed perhaps his greatest virtue—the ability to engender hope. Again, Martin Luther King ("we shall overcome") was doing the same thing. Both had to back up those words with actions in order to make such hope a reality.

Love has its ultimate expression in the things of God and the Spirit, but it is relevant to our political and social lives as well. If love is the greatest of the biblical virtues, it is possibly also the ultimate home for all the virtues. We are courageous in order to protect people and things we love. We fight for justice for those we love (even at a distance). We exercise the self-control of moderation and seek to bring wisdom into the world for the sake of what and whom we love. Our earnest love for a certain kind of world gives us faith and hope that such a world can be brought into being.

It is very difficult to assess the quality of love in political candidates. Perhaps one manifestation of it is passion. Passion comes from the Greek word for pain or suffering. To say we love or are passionate about something is a declaration that we are willing to suffer for it. What are candidates passionate about? That is, what are they willing to suffer for?



When we are choosing someone to lead us, we do best to look for a "good human being." Such a person is not likely to be moralistic or pious or politically correct. But needs to be virtuous. Because, over time, nations flourish only to the degree that their collective virtue sustains.

interesting...