"...You know the US government shouldn't give high security clearances
to Jewish people, because when we are asked for help we're willing to do
anything for the love of our country, Israel'--Comments of Jonathan Jay
Pollard, Intellgence Anaylst for the US Navy, convicted of spying for
Israel. In the 18 months that he worked as an Israeli spy, Pollard sold
some 800,000 highly classified documents to Israel who in turn sold them
to America's enemies, who at that time included the Soviets and the
Chinese. Officials who were involved with the investigation are all in
agreement that there has never been an individual who did more damage to
American's national security than Pollard, and now--if it can be
believed--there are those vying for Jewish support including none other
than presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani who are pressing for Pollard to
be released from prison. In a better time in America's history, Pollard
would have been executed for jeapordizing the lives of hundreds of
millions of Americans. Those who side with him and who are working for
his release should be seen in the same light as he occupies, which is as
a vile traitor and a threat to every person in America
---------------------------------------------------------
Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Very few Americans believe Iran represents
a danger for their country, according to a poll by New York Times and
CBS News. Only 10 per cent of respondents think Iran is a threat to the
United States that requires military action now, down 11 points since
mid-February.

Conversely, 65 per cent of respondents think Iran is a threat that can
be contained with diplomacy now, while 18 per cent say the country is
not a menace to the U.S. at this time.

After being branded as part of an "axis of evil" by United States
president George W. Bush in January 2002, Iran has contended that its
nuclear program aims to produce energy, not weapons. In June 2005,
former Tehran mayor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won Iran’s presidential election
in a run-off over Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani with 61.6 per cent of all
cast ballots.

In December 2006, the United Nations (UN) Security Council unanimously
voted to impose sanctions against Iran after it failed to stop uranium
enrichment. On Jan. 2, Ahmadinejad declared, "Let the world know that
from the Iranian nation’s point of view, this resolution has no
validity. I want (the United States) to know that the Iranian nation has
humiliated you many times, and it will humiliate you in future."

On Mar. 14, Ahmadinejad again dismissed the UN sanctions, saying,
"Issuing such torn pieces of paper will not have an impact on Iranian
nation’s will (to obtain nuclear technology). What is the aim of issuing
such resolutions? Today we are mastering the nuclear fuel cycle
completely."

Polling Data

Which comes closer to your opinion: Iran is a threat to the United
States that requires military action now, Iran is a threat that

Mar. 10
Feb. 27
Feb. 11

Threat requiring action now
10%
15%
21%

Threat that can be contained
65%
56%
57%

Not a threat at this time
18%
20%
14%

Not sure
7%
9%
8%



As you may know, members of the Bush administration have accused Iran of
supporting Iraqi insurgents by supplying them with weapons to use
against American forces. When members of the Bush administration talk
about Iran’s involvement in Iraq, do you think they are telling the
entire truth, mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they
mostly lying?

Telling entire truth
14%

Mostly telling truth
56%

Mostly lying
24%

Not sure
6%



Source: The New York Times / CBS News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,229 American adults, conducted
from Jan. 20 to Jan. 25, 2006. Margin of error is 3 per cent.

--------------------------------------------------------
Jewish leaders and groups are wary of Democratic presidential candidate
Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) recent rhetoric on the Middle East conflict,
according to an article in Monday's Politico.

Obama has sparked concern among Jewish leaders over phrases and remarks
not amenable to Israel's most aggressive supporters.

"His attack on cynicism, and another line about the 'cycle of violence'
struck hard-line supporters of Israel as suggesting that the Israeli and
Palestinian sides are equally to blame – something Obama himself has
rejected in other, prepared remarks," writes Politico columnist Ben
Smith. "Phrases like 'cycle of violence' and – worse still – pledges to
be 'even-handed' are freighted with meaning in that context, and a
second-hand report in January from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency in
January that Obama had once pledged to be 'even-handed' suggested to
some Jewish critics that he was taking the Palestinian side."

Obama has been regularly voted "worst for Israel" among all of the
American presidential candidates in the liberal Israeli newspaper
Haaretz.

"Obama 'fails to understand the totalitarian politics and sensibilities
of the folks over there, who are not well meaning,' said E.J. Kessler, a
New York Post editor who’s a longtime observer of American-Jewish
politics" writes Smith. "'His approach will appeal to a lot of lefty
Jews, but it won’t appeal to the serious players,' she said, referring
to the better-organized and better funded groups like the American
Israel Public Affairs Council, AIPAC, at whose conference Obama put in
an appearance earlier this month."

Obama has recruited Jewish Florida Congressman Rep. Robert Wexler
(D-FL), who has endorsed Obama's campaign, to allay concerns in the
jewish community. "What has always struck me about Senator Obama - and
this is one of the reasons that I have endorsed his candidacy for
president - is that a love for Israel and a desire to keep the Jewish
people secure is evident not just in his work, but also in his heart,"
wrote Wexler in an e-mail to Jewish leaders.

Obama's Iraq war position and its implications for dealing with Iran
further complicates his relationship with pro-Israel activists, writes
Smith.

"If you’re serious of confronting the regime of Iran and Ahmadinejad and
his plans for mass murder then you have to look at the map and say how
do we do this – what is the only way that we do this, what is the most
practical way to do this," Norpac leader Ben Chouake is quoted as
saying. Norpac recently circulated an email soliciting donations to any
six candidates form both parties, but excluded Obama from the list.

... I think your anti-semitic propaganda is a bit much, don't you? Their
are honest-to-truth problems with what the Israelies do and general
anti-jew propaganda peaces like this make everyone who points out
problems with Israel seem like a loon.

somewhere in the middle of the piece, you mention that Obama is not
favorable with the Israelites or Iran. Who cares? We should not worry
wether another country likes who we pick as our leader. That is our
responsibility, and it is our business. Wether ooglie booglie likes
presidential candidate oscar the grouch or not does not affect wether
they will be an effective president for what we, the people of the
United States want.

Oh Shadow Eagle, your Jewish conspiracy theory have as much weight as
the joint government-extra terrestrial conspiracy theory. And Keep It
Short and Simple!KISS!

dont forget your news source... Dan Blather, Tom Brokejaw, and the
Communist news network. (CNN)