100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Whoms better Beatles or U2 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Jeanc,
Comparing the Beatles and the Rolling Stones is a very hard comparison as the music is not really the same genre (if you will). I saw the Stones this past summer (2006) and believe me they STILL ROCK THE HOUSE DOWN! The Beatles music was different than anything the Stones produced. Both considered Rock and Roll but so different that comparasons don't work with those two iconic bands. Not for ME anyway, just my .02 cents worth. Have a great and glorious day! Verb 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yo Verb, the comparrison was Beatles / U-2
not the stones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEATLES!!! U2 kinda sucks cept for "The Saints Are Coming"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U-2 aint bad.. But to compare them to the BEATLES???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U2 is a terrible, pompous band. the beatles rock my world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry. I love U2 as well, but obviously the Beatles are better. I
mean come on...they are incredible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beatles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beatles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remember Yesterday... Help... etc., etc., etc.!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that was great music????????????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont especially care for the Beatles. I like U2 on just a few songs.
Still, I'd have to say, musically the Beatles are more talented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely the Beatles
1.She love You 2. I want to hold your hand 3.Yesterday 4. Yellow Submarine 5.Eleanor Rigby 6. The Long and winding road these were a few of the best of the beatles... U2 could never compare to these songs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you Shadow!!! 100%
|
|
|
|
|
