(((((Karma))))))) hiyas

((((TTO))))) done bein small now?

((((((Spay)))))) ya goof ball lol

(((Fanta))) yeah yeah you're still smacked

(((((((Z sis))))))) how ya feelin???


(((((WHisper gurl)))))) Welcome to the Harry club

Poet ... small AND Blue .. that sucked huge .. lmao ...

back to bein tall and goofy .. woo hoo ... let the weekend begin ..

The first Harry Potter book was published in the United Kingdom by
Bloomsbury in July 1997 and in the United States by Scholastic in
September of 1998, but not before Rowling had received a six-figure sum
for the American rights – an unprecedented amount for a children's book.

Ha!!!!

It does say something about adults who read the books, but you dont want
to hear that! LOL

They are still a good read Fanta. Does wherever you're looking mention
that more adults read them than children.

no the opposite, it says adults that , ah hell it dont matter!!

Fanta go to my room!!

personally myself .. I think they are a great read .. besides.. what
ever gets people reading is a good thing .. J.M.O.... for hopefully it
gets more KIDS reading ..

loll... you tell him Poet lol

heh I didn't say I was in my room I just sent him there LMAO

A. S. Byatt authored a New York Times editorial calling Rowling's
universe a “secondary world, made up of intelligently patchworked
derivative motifs from all sorts of children's literature [...] written
for people whose imaginative lives are confined to TV cartoons, and the
exaggerated (more exciting, not threatening) mirror-worlds of soaps,
reality TV and celebrity gossip". Byatt went on to analyse the series'
widespread appeal and concluded that this "derivative manipulation of
past motifs" is for adult readers driven by a desire to regress to their
"own childish desires and hopes" and for younger readers, "the powerful
working of the fantasy of escape and empowerment, combined with the fact
that the stories are comfortable, funny, just frightening enough". The
end result being the levelling "of cultural studies, which are as
interested in hype and popularity as they are in literary merit".[

It does sound like a few ppl I know LOL

End result is " CHILDRENS' BOOKS"

That makes for a whole lot of adults who want to regress then.
But the bit about tv cartoons, soaps etc. I have to wonder about. I
don't watch any of the stuff mentioned. I simply enjoy a good read.
Have you tried reading them or refused because they're 'childrens'
books.

I dont like fantasy, History, thats my deal

I dont care what ppl read, If they want to read childrens books great,
but a horse is a horse, Dont call it by any other name!



Childrens books!!!!!

HAHAHAH YOU SAID FANTA

I may read "childrens" books and fantasy but I do not limit myself to
just those genre's...I read everything except romance novels..I don't
read those because they are too unrealistic for me....that and they make
me wanna barf