Topic: art....what do you think?
Single_Rob's photo
Sun 04/20/08 11:57 AM
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Artist-Leaves-Dog-To-Die-on-Exhibition-Display-82091.shtml

ChickyB's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:01 PM
Now I am depressed sad

no photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:02 PM
That is so inhumane.......grumble

braziliancutie's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:03 PM
:cry:

lilith401's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:04 PM
Not much.

bl4cks4bb4th's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:04 PM
Now that is messed up. I can understand what he was trying to convey, but that's the wrong way to go about it. Just a terrible thing to do.

no photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:05 PM
I used to say I love art in all forms..now Ill have to say MOST forms..sad

MirrorMirror's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:19 PM
ohwell

FaithfulOne78's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:24 PM
:cry: :cry: that is so cruel and sad..:cry:

yellowrose10's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:29 PM
art is successful if it invokes a response (negative or positive)

chickayoshi's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:33 PM
Someone else put up a petition about the cruel art work. She had a long article about it too. Yes! This is the cruelest thing to do to God's creation. And the art museum wants him to do it again? Sick! noway

Single_Rob's photo
Sun 04/20/08 12:33 PM

art is successful if it invokes a response (negative or positive)
but to intentionally inflict pain on a living being, whether you believe it has a sould or not speaks volumes about your character. I would never intentionally inflict suffereing on another creature to try to make a point

yellowrose10's photo
Sun 04/20/08 01:04 PM


art is successful if it invokes a response (negative or positive)
but to intentionally inflict pain on a living being, whether you believe it has a sould or not speaks volumes about your character. I would never intentionally inflict suffereing on another creature to try to make a point


I agree...it's sick and wrong and the artist needs therapy or something, but the artist is getting the reaction he was going for