Community > Posts By > cuddlebunny00
Topic:
Cougars....
|
|
I have been dating younger for years now..anywhere from 8 to 20 yrs younger..it never bothered me before but this last one was 20 yrs younger..hes sweeet, good looking..sex is good but...for some reason..this time, i feel like a mom to him. He wants a relationship annd more but how do i get over this feeling?..Btw hes half my age plus 7 yrs exactly lol Send him to your room without dinner, take away his gaming system, and tell him if he can't make you feel equally balanced, he's gonna be getting a spankin... |
|
|
|
Topic:
The Womens room
|
|
lol yes true
Oh well, I think the "cougars room" is alot more funner anyways |
|
|
|
Topic:
Cougars....
|
|
I have been dating younger for years now..anywhere from 8 to 20 yrs younger..it never bothered me before but this last one was 20 yrs younger..hes sweeet, good looking..sex is good but...for some reason..this time, i feel like a mom to him. He wants a relationship annd more but how do i get over this feeling?..Btw hes half my age plus 7 yrs exactly lol
|
|
|
|
Topic:
The Womens room
|
|
I thought this would be a great place for us women to chit chat about anything
|
|
|
|
Topic:
god may be satan
|
|
May I say something...nice?
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
|
|
I did not say that I had the answers. I am looking for opinions and thoughts. Well, I gave you mine, and you responded by belittling my intelligence. LOL |
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
|
|
I did not say that I had the answers. I am looking for opinions and thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
Edited by
cuddlebunny00
on
Wed 03/20/13 07:46 PM
|
|
OMG!! do we really have to get THAT technical? Shall I say "moving back from evolution" to suit you?
Biology is just ONE meaning |
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
|
|
You don't call yourself Dodo for nothing I see
So much for intelligence from outter or inner space Moving forward "in Evolution" what are your thoughts people? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
|
|
Do you believe that mankind is moving backwards in evolution rather than forward? Are we not suppose to be moving towards being more loving, kinder, compassionate human beings? I feel as though people have become more agressive, selfish and immoral. What are your thoughts? You have a misunderstanding about the meaning of evolution. The word is just a fancy synonym for change. The in itself does not imply "forward" or "backward" movement. Also, when you use the word immoral, you are using a religious term. So, if you want people to be more loving, kinder and compassionate, what do you think it will take for people to become that? The Definition of Morality First published Wed Apr 17, 2002; substantive revision Mon Mar 14, 2011 The term “morality” can be used either descriptively to refer to some codes of conduct put forward by a society or, some other group, such as a religion, or accepted by an individual for her own behavior or normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons. What “morality” is taken to refer to plays a crucial, although often unacknowledged, role in formulating ethical theories. To take “morality” to refer to an actually existing code of conduct put forward by a society results in a denial that there is a universal morality, one that applies to all human beings. This descriptive use of “morality”is the one used by anthropologists when they report on the morality of the societies that they study. Recently, some comparative and evolutionary psychologists (Haidt, Hauser, De Waal) have taken morality, or a close anticipation of it, to be present among groups of non-human animals, primarily other primates but not limited to them. “Morality” has also been taken to refer to any code of conduct that a person or group takes as most important. Among those who use “morality” normatively, all hold that “morality” refers to a code of conduct that applies to all who can understand it and can govern their behavior by it. In the normative sense, morality should never be overridden, that is, no one should ever violate a moral prohibition or requirement for non-moral considerations. All of those who use “morality” normatively also hold that, under plausible specified conditions, all rational persons would endorse that code. Moral theories differ in their accounts of the essential characteristics of rational persons and in their specifications of the conditions under which all rational persons would endorse a code of conduct as a moral code. These differences result in different kinds of moral theories. Related to these differences, moral theories differ with regard to those to whom morality applies, that is, those whose behavior is subject to moral judgment. Some hold that morality applies only to those rational beings that have those features of human beings that make it rational for all of them to endorse morality, viz., fallibility and vulnerability. Other moral theories claim to put forward an account of morality that provides a guide to all rational beings, even if these beings do not have these human characteristics, e.g., God. Dictionary definitions of referring terms are usually just descriptions of the important features of the referents of those terms. Insofar as the referents of a term share the features that account for why that term refers to those referents, the term is not regarded as ambiguous. Referring terms are ambiguous when the referents of the term differ from each other in sufficiently important ways. The original descriptive definition of “morality” refers to the most important code of conduct put forward by a society and accepted by the members of that society. When the examination of large diverse societies raised problems for this original descriptive definition, different descriptive definitions were offered in which “morality” refers to the most important code of conduct put forward and accepted by any group, or even by an individual. Apart from containing some prohibitions on harming some others, different moralities can differ from each other quite extensively. “Morality”when used in a descriptive sense has an essential feature that “morality” in the normative sense does not have, namely, that it refers to codes of conduct that are actually put forward and accepted by some society, group, or individual. If one is not a member of that society or group, and is not that individual, accepting a descriptive definition of “morality” has no implications for how one should behave. If one accepts a moral theory's account of rational persons and the specifications of the conditions under which all rational persons would endorse a code of conduct as a moral code, then one accepts that moral theory's normative definition of “morality. ” Accepting a normative definition of “morality” commits a person to regarding some behavior as immoral, perhaps even behavior that one is tempted to perform. Because accepting a normative definition of “morality” involves this commitment it is not surprising that philosophers seriously disagree about what normative definition to accept. Definition of EVOLUTION 1 : one of a set of prescribed movements 2 a : a process of change in a certain direction : unfolding b : the action or an instance of forming and giving something off : emission c (1) : a process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state : growth (2) : a process of gradual and relatively peaceful social, political, and economic advance d : something evolved 3 : the process of working out or developing 4 a : the historical development of a biological group (as a race or species) : phylogeny b : a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations; also : the process described by this theory 5 : the extraction of a mathematical root 6 : a process in which the whole universe is a progression of interrelated phenomena |
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
|
|
I agree that there is still alot of good people..otherwise this world would be in total chaos. The media definitely has an effect on how we view the world and sadly alot of it is misinformation and embellishment.
I suppose if we see this kind of news repeatedly day after day then eventually our mind is being programed to believe that there is nothing but chaos out there. But I still believe that we don't seem to be evolving in the way I think we should lol...but then again who gave me that decision. I heard this once from a teacher of "Law Of Attraction" she said that realistically, if the media reported all the GOOD in the world rather than the bad, in comparison..the bad news would be a bleep on the screen :) |
|
|
|
Topic:
old hippie type hermits.
Edited by
cuddlebunny00
on
Wed 03/20/13 04:50 PM
|
|
Well I get alot of younger men messaging me and nudging me with hugs n kisses...they are mostly from Asia and Africa. I am sure all the women here get those.
I am sure these women talking about marriage are from the same countries as I mentioned, even if they look caucasion, be cautious. We all want to have a better life |
|
|
|
Topic:
Defining Moment
|
|
A-Haaa but it can sure buy you alot of toys and fun
|
|
|
|
Topic:
THREAD KILLLER!!! - part 2
|
|
Oh!!
|
|
|
|
Topic:
money and love
|
|
Oh Lordy
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
|
|
Yes, but don't you think that we should be moving forward now from this kind of behavior?
|
|
|
|
Topic:
money and love
|
|
oh please. no woman is going to go out with the guy who has no money. sorry, that's just a fact. BS. I recently dated a poor man who had very little money. He had other things to offer, and I enjoyed my time with him. Money really isn't everything. then you're the exception, nt the rule. while money is not everything, it is one of the main things people look at. i admit i'm materialistic. wish it weren't so, but it's true. I was in a relationship with two men who had no money so yes there is At the same time? Haha! NO, I read what I wrote and it does look that way |
|
|
|
Topic:
Aside from Technology
Edited by
cuddlebunny00
on
Wed 03/20/13 04:17 PM
|
|
Do you believe that mankind is moving backwards in evolution rather than forward? Are we not suppose to be moving towards being more loving, kinder, compassionate human beings? I feel as though people have become more agressive, selfish and immoral.
What are your thoughts? |
|
|
|
Topic:
money and love
|
|
And sometimes a lack of money is only temporary..alot of celebrities and famous people were homeless at one time...
hmm just something to add lol |
|
|
|
Topic:
Is it wrong to cheat
|
|
Oh come on. I wasn't born yesterday. If you really, truly loved her, you'd be trying to work to solve this with her. If sex to you, is more important than the relationship, then I think you're better leaving. Talk about having your cake and eating it. This is probably another troll but I will put my two cents in anyways. I totally agree with this. One day OP you will be crying the blues when your wife leaves you over this. Its ALOT harder to find that person thats perfect for you than it is to get counceling for this issue. Just ask many singles in this chat? I am agreeing that if you really loved your wife then you would not even be thinking about having an affair, as much as sex is important to you. What did you really expect us to tell you? Puleeeeeeeeeese! |
|
|