Maybe it would be possible for you "enough is enough" people to just ignore this thread and let the people who still want to discuss this story do so in peace?

I don't remember writing that "pot heads are violent..in general".

Have you ever felt "fear, anxiety, panic or paranoia"?

Oh, since you've smoked marijuana for 35 years, I guess we can ignore all research done on the subject.

Who started it does NOT matter in any legal sense. What matters is how it went from a fist fight and became a life and death struggle. Just because you start a fight, that doesn't mean you don't have the right to defend yourself against murder.

We have had two witnesses come forward and state that they saw Trayvon straddling George and punching him repeatedly in the face "MMA style". One witness is a minor and his mother won't allow him to testify, because she's concerned for his safety. That leaves us with one adult witness who corroborates George's story. And the forensic evidence that Trayvon had wounds to his hands. And the fact that Trayvon was high (remember George saying "He looks like he's on drugs or something"?). And the fact that George admitted that he had lost Trayvon minutes before the confrontation. Trayvon was faster and more athletic than George. Also, the unaltered 911 tape shows that George wasn't sure of Trayvon's race, so it couldn't have been profiling. It sounds more and more like George was doing a public service by following Trayvon and Trayvon decided to confront George, rather than run home or call 911 like any thinking person would have.

The pertinent section.

Trayvon had THC (marijuana) in his blood.

Breaking: Autopsy Reveals Trayvon Martin Had Drugs in System

From what little I've read, violations of registration are punished more harshly than the original crime.

All of my gay male friends have loved boobs. It's inherit to being a man, it's a genetic indicator that a woman is a desirable mate. In other words, this is what you call a red flag.

What you fail to understand is that he wasn't immediately arrested by the police. He had plenty of time to destroy evidence of any new crimes he committed. In other words, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Let's see...

* Convicted twice for aggravated sexual assault of a minor.
* Convicted once for having tens of thousands of child pornography pictures.
* Gets out of prison and immediately starts creating a series of false identities and social media profiles.

On what grounds should we give him the benefit of the doubt?

As for paying his debt to society, that's just not possible. His evil will linger as long as those girls he molested (including any he might have molested without being caught) are in this world. Possibly longer, as the neuroses they developed as a result of their victimization might be passed down to their children in one way or another. Pedophilia is also a crime that reproduces sexually, the act itself can produce more pedophiles. The victim can become the victimizer. If "Lex" produced more child predators, how can his debt to society ever be paid? It's simply not possible by any stretch of the imagination.

Don't be that guy.

If you are really worried about a person not supplying their real picture, ask for a picture of them holding up a sign that says "Mingle".

What law did Zimmerman break?

It's perfectly legal for a private citizen to profile.

It's perfectly legal for a private citizen to follow another private citizen on public property.

Even if Zimmerman DID attack Trayvon, he still retains his rights to self defense if he was in fear of his life.

I can only find one lawsuit against Blackwater, can you point me to this plethora of lawsuits? There are more lawsuits filed against the police here in Toledo in a year and the TPD aren't in a war zone.



So? Who cares what they charge, nobody is forced to hire them. That is the beauty of the free enterprise system, nobody can force you to purchase a good or service.

He says Trayvon approached him. What makes you think it was the other way around.

How many thousands of posts did Lex make? He was breaking the law the whole time he was here.

Have you checked his apartment? His car? His computer? How do you know that a man who was convicted of sexual assault twice and possession of child porn once was "repenting or changing"? Why would you even conclude that, when he was clearly breaking the law just by being here?

That would be the victim's right to accept money to not sue.



The Government is always more corrupt than a company. But even if they were equally corrupt, we can pick a new company, we can't pick a new Government.

The city council would contract policing out to a company. These sorts of things wouldn't be tolerated by the company, because they could lose their contract. Besides that, there would no longer be the incestuous relationship between the people doing the policing and the courts. So when the police made a huge screw up, the court would be more likely to find for the plaintiff. Some rich neighborhoods already do this. According to Wikipedia, some poor neighborhoods do too.

EDIT: This would also eliminate "blue flu". If they did this, the people of the city would demand a new police company be hired.

For child molesters, the rate is 43%. You have to break it out, because you are including all sex crimes, not just pedophilia.

Do you know what a Mysoped is? It's a pedophile who hates children and only preys on strangers, rather than acquaintances.

You gave me two options:

a) he's looking for someone with kids because many women do have them that young
b) [he's looking for someone] they haven't had kids yet?

I will offer another option

c) He is a mysoped. (which would be supported by the torture / murder porn he had)

I'm sure there are other options.

d) CYA in case he ever went before a judge.
e) Smoke screen, so people didn't know his real desires (Me thinks he doth protest too much)