Everybody understands the lefts view on justice. They are all for it unless it means charging a democrat.. The weaponization of justice is valued by the left because that is the only way they have a chance to win in “24. .. You keep ranting” nobody cares” and I’d argue that many people care and we are seeing it everyday with the blacks and Latinos and independents that are turning their back on the democrats and plan on supporting Trump and republicans. Maybe if Biden cared about Americans and our Allie’s in the world and cared about doing right for America instead of trying to change this country into the chithole he dreams of, than maybe he would have a Honest chance to be re-elected. But it’s not in his nature to do right. ..So I guess you are right in the long run, Trump supporters don’t care about Trump in court. They realize the democrats have corrupted the system to the point that people that don’t like Trump will vote for him just because they see that it’s lot a better alternative than what we have now.

The evidence against Hilary and Biden of illegal acts that compare or worse than any illegal acts that Trump was charged with are there but ignored because of the weaponization of the DOJ.. . Every legal scholar agrees Hilary destroyed government evidence and Biden had documents he shouldn’t have and lots of them in several different unsecured places. If you can’t see the unfairness in the way the feds handled the Trump case compaired to those other two cases , Means your Trump deraingement guides your decisions.

There are no legal scholars who can show that Hillary illegally destroyed evidence and the crime is not merely keeping classified documents, but knowingly keeping them. Prosecutors would have to show intent, and simply having documents in the boxes out in the garage is not enough. Hillary's email servers getting wiped after she left office is not destroying evidence, but just a good idea for old computer hardware.

And still, where's the weaponization? Where has Biden directed the DOJ to do anything? Sure, Trump will say so, but that's just because it's how Trump ran his DOJ. A.G. Sessions ran the DOJ and didn't run it exactly how Trump wanted, so he installed Barr, and all along, both told Trump they found nothing on Biden and Clinton, making Trump look like an idiot after he promised to jail Hillary. That would be weaponization. By all accounts, Biden has kept out of the Trump investigation.

Your insistence that Trump is innocent--despite literal piles of evidence, and that Biden "is the most corrupt president ever" is the real Trump derangement syndrome.

Baaaaah, baaaah, you are the most gullible person I have ever seen. Are you on the mailing list for the democrats weekly talking points . It’s hard to take someone seriously that refuses to see the obvious. The obvious being that joe Biden has divided this country’s citizens against each other more than anybody since Abe Lincoln. Joe is poison for this country. Hilary’s is about as innocent as the democrats that stole the 2020 election. Guilty? Hell yes, but swept under the rug like most crimes committed by democrats…

Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are so guilty that nobody can find the evidence? So guilty that years after finding the classified docs in Biden's home and office, or Hillary's email server, They can't even identify the laws broken, or find witnesses to the "crimes." Maybe I'm the sheep, but I can point to articles and government reports that support what I'm saying, and the silly Republicans just say "it's obvious." Is it possible that they think "obvious" means "I can't say how, but I feel it's true."

Yes, it took years to put together indictments for Trump, but at least we can now read about which laws he's charged with breaking, and even see and listen to some of the evidence collected. In court, they're lining up witnesses--some of them were even in on the crimes, pleading out and agreeing to testify. The other side: "Biden is so guilty! The most corrupt president ever. The worst president ever. And so guilty." (with the lowest unemployment, the highest stock market, zero indictments, zero family members appointed to government positions & no foreign payments taken)

Who's the gullible one?

You!!! You are the one that refuses to admit the people that investigated the destruction of evidence against Hilary said their was illegal activity destroying government property, but they refused to bring charges because it was a Clinton . Same with Biden , the evidence of illegality was their but they refused to bring charges because it was a Biden. Those are the facts . Because you democrats believe in and want a two tiered justice system doesn’t negate the facts that Joe and Hilary got special treatment from Biden’s D.O.J. I’m sure the trial of Gold Bar Bob will be a farce , and he will pay no penalty. That way of life ( thieving and lying) is par for the corse for most of these democrat politicians.

That's funny, because Hillary's email server was not a government asset. It was a private server she kept in her home, so even if she had taken an axe to the server, there would've been no destruction of government property. I suspect you got your information from some unhinged radical bloggers. And as for Clinton & Biden not getting charged because their position, I'd refer you to the fact that they were investigated by House Republicans and Trump's DOJ. No friends there. What's your excuse for that?

Lastly, I haven't seen anything to indicate that Senator Menendez or Rep Cuellar will get extra help from Democrats on their legal problems.

It was a hammer, not a ax… and the governmental property was the e-mails not the machine… The fact that Menendez is still holding a seat after a previous incident. That’s the support, when a republican rep. just a few months ago was forced out by other republicans for similar unethical behavior. Why isn’t other democrats asking for his ouster That’s the differance. .. Also…Clinton’s and Biden’s position had nothing to do with their crimes being swept under the rug, it was Who they are not what they were or still are. A Trump appointee isn’t bound by Trump. Unlike Obamas “ right hand man”..

Biden might have sold out to the oil companies but he’s still a far better choice than trump
Frankly I wish that the governor of California had run for the White House
He would have done more than Biden for the environment
The problems of global warming are incredibly much more serious than inflation or any of the other problems most people worry about.
There’s no inflation on a dead planet

Jim comeys investigation found that Hilary had about 100+ emails containing classified info. on several different unsecured servers. She treated those emails like a grocery list. She was supposed to treat them for what they are . Top secret, classified info. But Comey even said although others could and would be charged after such wrecklessness he thinks there should be no charges brought against mrs. clinton. So your theory is that kind of two tiered justice is fine.

A terrible economy is real and now, the damaging effects of global warming is speculative fear mongering in most peoples minds. If we can’t pay our bills is what folks worry about first.

If the economy is so terrible, then why is Trump trying to take credit for it?

https://thehill.com/homenews/4435862-trump-claims-credit-record-stock-market-biden/

But of course, you're going to get it wrong if you listen to what Trump says.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/14/politics/fact-check-trump-claims-about-biden-economy/index.html

To Bart…
What makes you say this:
the damaging effects of global warming is speculative fear
I don’t understand
Please explain how the effects of global warming is merely speculative fear

You can read Comey's report on Hillary's email investigation. A couple pages long and easy to read.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

There were no charges for Hillary or anybody else because the facts didn't support charges. And Comey never said that others could and would be charged. He left it to DOJ to make those decisions and they declined, too. Not two-tiered justice. At worst Comey said that things were discussed that should've been known to be inappropriate to discuss in an unsecured system. He didn't even say whether Clinton wrote the classified information, so she could have simply been replying to someone else's message that also included some classified topic. Either way, the relevant laws require intention or gross negligence resulting in exposing classified information. Didn't happen.

I did read it and it clearly said there were top secret classified info about 110 items with those markings and even the ones not marked , on 32 different unsecured servers . she should have known better and had responsibility securing that info. And Comey did say, … Don’t mistake that others couldn’t and wouldn’t because he could recommend charges being brought but he wouldn’t in this case. Intent doesn’t have to be there to be charged. Incompetence could be enough though..