Previous 1 3 4
Topic: Would younger women date me?
Diligent's photo
Wed 09/09/09 09:50 AM
I have an account at "true.com". Supposedly, I am getting hits from women as young as 18-22 years of age wanting to date me. Many of these women are "sweet young things". I am kind of skeptical since I am not seeking out younger women in my profile. I think it is a trick by "true.com" to get me to buy a membership. Here, the site is free. So, if younger females respond in the "affirmative", the "true.com" messages might be for real. Give me your honest opinion.

lilith401's photo
Wed 09/09/09 09:53 AM
You are seeking out women who are 24-55. You are 45. That is 21 years your junior.... I am confused. How is that not seeking out younger women?? Is it just me?

lcjw's photo
Wed 09/09/09 09:54 AM
you have in your profile that you are looking for women 18-59 Why are you surprised?

MelodyGirl's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:11 AM

"I am kind of skeptical since I am not seeking out younger women in my profile."


As the other two ladies pointed out as well, you say you ARE NOT seeking out younger women in this post; however, your profile states "My ideal woman would be fit, smart, confident, loyal, and be between the ages of 24-55" and your email filters are set for 18-59.

You need a little continuity between your actual desires and your profile. winking

Diligent's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:13 AM
I altered my profile here to reflect the "responses" in "true.com". In reality, I would desire a woman more my age, 35-49. But, I do not want to categorically exlude a group of women who wish to speak to me.

Diligent's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:16 AM
Again, I altered my parameters here to reflect the "responses" I received in "true.com". This was only after receiving hits from younger women on that web site. Women 18 years of age are not my first choice. But, I would certainly talk to them.

lilith401's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:18 AM
Oh yes, 18 year old women have a **** ton in common with a 45 year old man who is suddenly warming up to the idea of a family. And heavens to betsy you offend these 18 year old GIRLS who are young enough to be your daughter...

Come on. If you prefer a woman your age, that's 40-50.

no photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:19 AM
huh
very misunderstood.
whoa spock

innwfl58's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:21 AM
:smile: check them out, they are spam, girls get you another site to pay for porn. good luck. so much junk on here.what

MelodyGirl's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:24 AM

Oh yes, 18 year old women have a **** ton in common with a 45 year old man who is suddenly warming up to the idea of a family. And heavens to betsy you offend these 18 year old GIRLS who are young enough to be your daughter...

Come on. If you prefer a woman your age, that's 40-50.


:laughing:

no photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:25 AM

Again, I altered my parameters here to reflect the "responses" I received in "true.com". This was only after receiving hits from younger women on that web site. Women 18 years of age are not my first choice. But, I would certainly talk to them.


Your profile still says you're looking for someone as young as 24. That's quite a bit younger than you.

lcjw's photo
Wed 09/09/09 10:29 AM

I altered my profile here to reflect the "responses" in "true.com". In reality, I would desire a woman more my age, 35-49. But, I do not want to categorically exlude a group of women who wish to speak to me.


Then, why are you even asking??????huh frown

WellHiThen's photo
Wed 09/09/09 12:35 PM
Diligent,

As far as I can tell, the site you mentioned is all or mostly BS. I started to fill out a profile but my machine crashed halfway through and I never finished. Despite the empty profile, I was immediately inundated with "replies" from "single women" raving about my profile!

It's a shame you can't ask a simple question in a forum like this without being psychoanalyzed. Is there some sort of taboo I should know about that says we can only associate with people of a certain age? Whatever happened to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"?


lilith401's photo
Wed 09/09/09 12:37 PM
Psychoanalyzed?

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

MelodyGirl's photo
Wed 09/09/09 03:21 PM

Diligent,

As far as I can tell, the site you mentioned is all or mostly BS. I started to fill out a profile but my machine crashed halfway through and I never finished. Despite the empty profile, I was immediately inundated with "replies" from "single women" raving about my profile!

It's a shame you can't ask a simple question in a forum like this without being psychoanalyzed. Is there some sort of taboo I should know about that says we can only associate with people of a certain age? Whatever happened to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"?


Anytime a member asks for feedback on their profile, they open themselves up for opinions.

His profile is conflicting. He asked about one issue but contradicted himself in his profile and then wondered “What went wrong”.

No psychoanalyzed him or banished him from socializing with anyone with whom he wishes. He burned his hand on the stove and asked why it happened. We pointed out the obvious.

lcjw's photo
Wed 09/09/09 04:15 PM


Diligent,

As far as I can tell, the site you mentioned is all or mostly BS. I started to fill out a profile but my machine crashed halfway through and I never finished. Despite the empty profile, I was immediately inundated with "replies" from "single women" raving about my profile!

It's a shame you can't ask a simple question in a forum like this without being psychoanalyzed. Is there some sort of taboo I should know about that says we can only associate with people of a certain age? Whatever happened to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"?


Anytime a member asks for feedback on their profile, they open themselves up for opinions.

His profile is conflicting. He asked about one issue but contradicted himself in his profile and then wondered “What went wrong”.

No psychoanalyzed him or banished him from socializing with anyone with whom he wishes. He burned his hand on the stove and asked why it happened. We pointed out the obvious.



Good girl Melody!drinker

no photo
Wed 09/09/09 04:29 PM
Um Dude.... Nevermind...... (HOWS THAT WORKING FOR YA?)

Diligent's photo
Wed 09/09/09 04:38 PM
I am on this site to meet "women". By my definition and the legal definition, a woman who is 18 or older is of legal age. I am not going through a "middle age crisis". But, "younger women" generally are more beautiful, less jaded, and more submissive than older women with failed marriages, emotional baggage, and droves of "daddy's babies".

Now, nothing is etched in stone. You can have age parameters or other qualifying factors including or eliminating groups of people. But, in my experience, it is silly to prevent individuals from even speaking to you because they are 1 year too old or too young, or live 10 miles outside of your area. What is important are mutual attractions, similar interests, common values, and common goals.

Now, what these garrulous females have overlooked by my seminal question are these issues; (1) My question was directed to YOUNG WOMEN, ages 18-22. I am asking them a rhetorical question; If they would date me, or someone my age with similar looks, etc., and (2), I openly questioned the validity of the e-mail messages I received on "true.com" from these hordes of younger women. I question them because I did not solicit them on my "true.com" profile. With the proper feedback from YOUNGER WOMEN on this blog, I can readily determine if those e-mails are legitimate.

MelodyGirl's photo
Wed 09/09/09 04:47 PM
Edited by MelodyGirl on Wed 09/09/09 04:49 PM

I am on this site to meet "women". By my definition and the legal definition, a woman who is 18 or older is of legal age. I am not going through a "middle age crisis". But, "younger women" generally are more beautiful, less jaded, and more submissive than older women with failed marriages, emotional baggage, and droves of "daddy's babies".

Now, nothing is etched in stone. You can have age parameters or other qualifying factors including or eliminating groups of people. But, in my experience, it is silly to prevent individuals from even speaking to you because they are 1 year too old or too young, or live 10 miles outside of your area. What is important are mutual attractions, similar interests, common values, and common goals.

Now, what these garrulous females have overlooked by my seminal question are these issues; (1) My question was directed to YOUNG WOMEN, ages 18-22. I am asking them a rhetorical question; If they would date me, or someone my age with similar looks, etc., and (2), I openly questioned the validity of the e-mail messages I received on "true.com" from these hordes of younger women. I question them because I did not solicit them on my "true.com" profile. With the proper feedback from YOUNGER WOMEN on this blog, I can readily determine if those e-mails are legitimate.


Had you posed your question like this:

(1) My question was directed to YOUNG WOMEN, ages 18-22. I am asking them a rhetorical question; If they would date me, or someone my age with similar looks, etc., and (2), I openly questioned the validity of the e-mail messages I received on "true.com" from these hordes of younger women. I question them because I did not solicit them on my "true.com" profile. With the proper feedback from YOUNGER WOMEN on this blog, I can readily determine if those e-mails are legitimate.

Or more succinctly:

"Are there any 18-22 year old who would date me out there?"

You may have gotten a reply from the 18-22 year olds. That is not how you presented the question though. Your original question is rather convoluted. whoa

MelodyGirl's photo
Wed 09/09/09 04:57 PM
Edited by MelodyGirl on Wed 09/09/09 05:29 PM

But, "younger women" generally are more beautiful, less jaded, and more submissive than older women with failed marriages, emotional baggage, and droves of "daddy's babies".


Wow! slaphead

I know of many older women on Mingle that are beautiful, who are now single through no fault of their own, they are devoid of emotional baggage or that do not have kids -- and if they do, they don't have multiple kids by multiple fathers. They probably are not, however, submissive.

From the tone of your other writings, my impression of you is that you prefer 'submissive' or basically a woman who is not strong emotionally so you can manipulate her. That might be why you are curious in meeting younger women -- so you can control them. spock

Unfortunately, a generalization of anyone is dangerous. Alas, there are older women who are not strong enough to thwart off controlling men; therefore, age is irrelevant.

Whatever you seek, good luck. So far, there don’t seem to be any 18-22 year olds on this site who are replying to your inquest so you may have gotten your answer. winking

Again, good luck in your search.

Previous 1 3 4